Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

Belfast International-2

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Belfast International-2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Aug 2018, 11:41
  #1421 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Londonderry
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A tail of two airports. Traveled through the international on Friday and was completely embarrassed by airport staff in front of other passengers. We travel with one of the SA lanyards and when we dared to ask for help to ensure there was no awkward situations we got hounded and treated dirt. Contrast to Manchester for the return journey and it was seamless.
buzz_hornet is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2018, 12:53
  #1422 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by buzz_hornet
A tail of two airports. Traveled through the international on Friday and was completely embarrassed by airport staff in front of other passengers. We travel with one of the SA lanyards and when we dared to ask for help to ensure there was no awkward situations we got hounded and treated dirt. Contrast to Manchester for the return journey and it was seamless.
that is understandable but that isnt really the airport, the handler is the party there thats embarrassing, the whole low cost avaition network is the reason for this, they batter airports and handling companies and everyone else involved down to the bare minimum so that people are just churned out onto the ramp/checkin with bare minimum traning now that it is now a safety hazard. I was talking to a dispatcher the other day and they didnt even know where to take passengers out of the lounges to the various assembly areas!!
29Alpha is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2018, 14:32
  #1423 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Londonderry
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 29Alpha
that is understandable but that isnt really the airport, the handler is the party there thats embarrassing, the whole low cost avaition network is the reason for this, they batter airports and handling companies and everyone else involved down to the bare minimum so that people are just churned out onto the ramp/checkin with bare minimum traning now that it is now a safety hazard. I was talking to a dispatcher the other day and they didnt even know where to take passengers out of the lounges to the various assembly areas!!
ironically thats pretty much what i said to the missus is that these folk are threw into the lions den with minimal training as they are essentially on there til the season ends. Maybe i could have worded it slightly better but having people staring and turning nose at you because you asked a simple question and someone flips out over it. I will highlight that last year the same person making a fuss couldn't have done anymore.
buzz_hornet is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2018, 17:49
  #1424 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Edinburgh
Age: 39
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 29Alpha
that is understandable but that isnt really the airport, the handler is the party there thats embarrassing, the whole low cost avaition network is the reason for this, they batter airports and handling companies and everyone else involved down to the bare minimum so that people are just churned out onto the ramp/checkin with bare minimum traning now that it is now a safety hazard. I was talking to a dispatcher the other day and they didnt even know where to take passengers out of the lounges to the various assembly areas!!
Another issue is that because wages are so low and workload so high, people who work for handling agents simply don't care. They see it as just another job. Very few with a real interest or knowledge of the aviation industry want to work on the ground due to the poor conditions, so you're left with folk who see it as no different to working in a supermarket. It's just a job to get money. This goes up quite far sadly. I have had duty managers in the past who didn't know the difference between, say, an A320 and a 737 or who didn't even know how to reissue a ticket, yet they had worked their way up simply because they stayed the longest.
edi_local is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2018, 19:01
  #1425 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by edi_local
Another issue is that because wages are so low and workload so high, people who work for handling agents simply don't care. They see it as just another job. Very few with a real interest or knowledge of the aviation industry want to work on the ground due to the poor conditions, so you're left with folk who see it as no different to working in a supermarket. It's just a job to get money. This goes up quite far sadly. I have had duty managers in the past who didn't know the difference between, say, an A320 and a 737 or who didn't even know how to reissue a ticket, yet they had worked their way up simply because they stayed the longest.
i had a manager once who told me the wheel chocks were just for show and the pilfering out of peoples bags was 'ok'
29Alpha is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2018, 23:21
  #1426 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ballymena
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have just been reading another story about a disabled person who alledges that the tools he needed to repair his wheelchair were taken off him by security at the weekend. He subsequently missed his flight, the airport has apologised and are making a payment to a local charity in lieu of compensation at his request.

What strikes me about this story and the posting from another passenger very recently is that in both cases, the security personnel were not prepared to listen to explanations, to think for a minute that these passengers might be telling the truth. Just listen for a few minutes. They just went straight to authority mode. Herein lies a problem because due to pay, terms and conditions, the wrong type of people might be recruited for these posts, people who are not able to use discretion or common sense. Although lack of common sense is a major problem now.

Another point strikes me. It is the airport that ends up with the very bad publicity, not ICTS. I understand fully why the airport has contracted out this work, but like many airports are now finding out, it is causing more problems that it solves. At a time or near full employment, these types of working contracts will attract no loyalty from employees and why should it. So the airport will just have more and more bad press as this situation escalates. At some point the airport might have to take security in house again and offer a better employment contract to attract and keep the quality staff. This is a problem for all airports and this might be the start of the death throws of out sourcing. However, we are all to blame. We don't want to pay that £1 to drop off or pick someone up. We want to fly to Spain for £20-30. If we want a better airport experience, then we will have to accept higher charges. However, if we are paying higher charges, then airports have to deliver, not put the extra revenue in their pockets. Lots of issues, what are the answers?
True Blue is online now  
Old 7th Aug 2018, 06:50
  #1427 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Belfast
Age: 40
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Meanwhile at City airport where the majority of my business travel has moved to, a new security search area is open, staff are pleasent and right in the middle of peak morning rush you can clear security in 5 mins.

Also worth noting that some airlines seem to be using this security mess to their commerical advantage. Naming no names but a number of weeks ago I purchased priorty security via an airline for my flight to Girona for just over £2.50. Next week I fly to Gdansk with the same airline who are now charging £6 for the same service 🤔 The entire operation is amatuerish. Somebody needs to get a grip and fix it.
EGAC is Better is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2018, 07:53
  #1428 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EGAC is Better
Meanwhile at City airport where the majority of my business travel has moved to, a new security search area is open, staff are pleasent and right in the middle of peak morning rush you can clear security in 5 mins.
There is no comparison that can be made between a business centric operation like the city and the mix of loco-business plus loco-holiday traveller at Aldergrove. I don't know about you guys' knowledge bases with regards to the specifics of requirement within the search area but I absolutely guarantee you that the happy shiny people in City would transform into stressed out grumpers in no time should they transfer up the road... Even with TB's example above, I would imagine there was more to that story with the wheelchair tools (like for example, why he had to have them in the cabin when his chair would have been in the hold, what nature were the tools in regards to the dimensions etc. for measurement against dangerous implements restrictions (Workmen aren't allowed their tools onboard either so they go in the hold) But as with most things, the media machine kicks into gear when there is any story that can jerk a reaction capable of generating the required number of clicks. I realise the airport has apologised so ofcourse everyone assumes guilt on their part (rather than a complicated scenario played out in a very short timescale where common sense on the part of even a security supervisor might have pleased this gentleman but still cost the supervisor their job for overstepping their increasingly tight (DFT set) restrictions)

I don't wish to try and explain away everything, it is quite clear the Security provision needs a wee shake up. Hopefully that will happen soon but please try and look a wee bit deeper than the surface of the matter.
SecondDog is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2018, 08:20
  #1429 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
City indeed is no security comparison, if you are present at both airports you will agree.
29Alpha is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2018, 09:31
  #1430 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Belfast
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is the link on the UK government website https://www.gov.uk/hand-luggage-restrictions/work-tools , spanners and wrenches not allowed in hand luggage.
Where this fell down is the customer service of perhaps helping the guy check-in his luggage. The security team had no choice, and they would be hammered
if they let it through as the CAA are continually monitoring airports with visits almost every week. Also believe that there is a full tender process underway for the
contract.
BFS watcher is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2018, 09:49
  #1431 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ballymena
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is how these issues are handled that are the problem. Too often, security person jumps straight into "you can't take that" rather than maybe passing the passenger onto some with more authority to help. So much depends on how these security teams are organised, do they work together etc. What is clear, it is not working well at the moment.
True Blue is online now  
Old 7th Aug 2018, 16:49
  #1432 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 29Alpha
City indeed is no security comparison, if you are present at both airports you will agree.
cannot be compared in realistic terms. If you are present at both, you should know this already. Different type of customer with different needs and states of preparedness (regular business folk compared with holiday once a yearers) and also a vast reduction in the amount of items screened at City as a result. Not to mention the different type of contents requiring fewer interventions from the searchers etc.

Can we put aside the competitive crap in our analysis and think about the facts.
SecondDog is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2018, 17:02
  #1433 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by True Blue
It is how these issues are handled that are the problem. Too often, security person jumps straight into "you can't take that" rather than maybe passing the passenger onto some with more authority to help. So much depends on how these security teams are organised, do they work together etc. What is clear, it is not working well at the moment.
TB, true. Send the guy back to the Airline to get the item checked in was what should happen but that is why I mention timescale. Not always possible considering how late in the process it is. There is no leeway for the Sec. Agents though, so jumping straight to 'can't take it' is their job. As for having someone with more authority to help him, that would also be a hinderance to the set up in the long run (when everyone started asking for the senior staffer), not to mention an uneccessary step given that the rules are in place and the onus is on the passenger to present themselves in line with the restrictions as given by their airline during the booking process.

I agree with Watcher above, the new Contractor will hopefully reinvigorate things a bit.
SecondDog is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2018, 20:24
  #1434 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Belfast
Age: 40
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SecondDog
cannot be compared in realistic terms. If you are present at both, you should know this already. Different type of customer with different needs and states of preparedness (regular business folk compared with holiday once a yearers) and also a vast reduction in the amount of items screened at City as a result. Not to mention the different type of contents requiring fewer interventions from the searchers etc.

Can we put aside the competitive crap in our analysis and think about the facts.
No competive crap in my statement SecondDog. Simple fact. My username was created in jest a number of years ago when bashing the other airport was rife on this forum.

I would contend that it is a very valid comparision. As a business, your clientelle have to served. To do so you have to learn how they operate and adjust appropriately. I regularly in the last number of weeks have passed through City at morning peak in around 5 mins. At Aldergrove, at a peak time, with priority security it had become normal to spend 15 minutes in a queue. I would argue the people in Aldergroves priority queue are primarily business orientated travellers.

The sooner it is accepted that security at Aldergrove is not up to scratch, the sooner it can be address. Head’s in the sand, hoping it’ll go away will not solve the problem.
EGAC is Better is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2018, 00:37
  #1435 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EGAC is Better


No competive crap in my statement SecondDog. Simple fact. My username was created in jest a number of years ago when bashing the other airport was rife on this forum.

I would contend that it is a very valid comparision. As a business, your clientelle have to served. To do so you have to learn how they operate and adjust appropriately. I regularly in the last number of weeks have passed through City at morning peak in around 5 mins. At Aldergrove, at a peak time, with priority security it had become normal to spend 15 minutes in a queue. I would argue the people in Aldergroves priority queue are primarily business orientated travellers.

The sooner it is accepted that security at Aldergrove is not up to scratch, the sooner it can be address. Head’s in the sand, hoping it’ll go away will not solve the problem.
The security at BFS is already being addressed. It just isn't a wave a wand type scenario (Any of you who know GK know that if he could have changed it immediately, he would have.)

Your contention about the makeup of the queue is not correct. All the airlines flog it like a dead horse online and in some cases lump it in with other products that increase search time.

No head in the sand here, mine has been in the search area plenty this year. Perhaps I just have a different perspective.
SecondDog is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2018, 00:41
  #1436 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I should note that my most recent trip I processed through the standard line for security in well under 5 minutes.
SecondDog is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2018, 20:57
  #1437 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Belfast
Age: 40
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SecondDog
The security at BFS is already being addressed. It just isn't a wave a wand type scenario (Any of you who know GK know that if he could have changed it immediately, he would have.)

Your contention about the makeup of the queue is not correct. All the airlines flog it like a dead horse online and in some cases lump it in with other products that increase search time.

No head in the sand here, mine has been in the search area plenty this year. Perhaps I just have a different perspective.
Not to labour the point because I guess we aren’t going to agree. However, at the times I travel through Aldergrove, I would estimate upwards of 80% of those in the priorty queue are suited or smart casual carrying laptops. It is safe to assume business travel for most of those.

I’m not bashing the people on the ground. On the face of it, the entire security hall in its current form is unfit for purpose. It cannot satisfactorily handle the volume in a reasonable time, consistently.

Like the MD or not, this is a failure and he ultimately carries the can. A well prepared and planned operation wouldn’t need to be wishing they could ‘wave a wand’ to fix this. Its hardly unexpected that the airport has this many travellers going through.
EGAC is Better is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2018, 22:30
  #1438 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EGAC is Better


Not to labour the point because I guess we aren’t going to agree. However, at the times I travel through Aldergrove, I would estimate upwards of 80% of those in the priorty queue are suited or smart casual carrying laptops. It is safe to assume business travel for most of those.

I’m not bashing the people on the ground. On the face of it, the entire security hall in its current form is unfit for purpose. It cannot satisfactorily handle the volume in a reasonable time, consistently.

Like the MD or not, this is a failure and he ultimately carries the can. A well prepared and planned operation wouldn’t need to be wishing they could ‘wave a wand’ to fix this. Its hardly unexpected that the airport has this many travellers going through.
point taken and fair enough, but the security hall and facade was built before the md arrived. The md cannot break a contract without good reason and with compensation also.
29Alpha is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2018, 10:07
  #1439 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: N.Ireland
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe security will improve!!!!!

https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/b...-37197755.html
GAZMO is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2018, 12:39
  #1440 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EGAC is Better


Not to labour the point because I guess we aren’t going to agree. However, at the times I travel through Aldergrove, I would estimate upwards of 80% of those in the priorty queue are suited or smart casual carrying laptops. It is safe to assume business travel for most of those.

I’m not bashing the people on the ground. On the face of it, the entire security hall in its current form is unfit for purpose. It cannot satisfactorily handle the volume in a reasonable time, consistently.

Like the MD or not, this is a failure and he ultimately carries the can. A well prepared and planned operation wouldn’t need to be wishing they could ‘wave a wand’ to fix this. Its hardly unexpected that the airport has this many travellers going through.
It isn't a case of not agreeing. It more a case of agreeing that what you see (or are presented with by the media) might not be as clear cut behind the scenes. (For example, I believe the hall would have been capable of processing the current forecast loads but other factors at play have both caused and highlighted the bad times and painted them as ever present when they are not)

You say that the MD carries the can but that is really just a PR carrying of the can for those who want to wail at someone. He has actually done (instigated) a lot behind the scenes to improve performance.

I cannot really talk about the details (which is frustrating) but it could have been much worse than it has been if not for the efforts of many Airport and ICTS staff going the extra mile to assist.

I, like some of the others below/above believe that life should improve under the new contractor come October.
SecondDog is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.