Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Monarch 4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 07:29
  #761 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hemel Hempstead
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Andrew Swaffield on BBC’s Today programme - confirmed that next year’s projected loss was over £100m. Decision was made on Saturday night.
toledoashley is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 07:47
  #762 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How gullible does he think people are?!
You don't knock up a website as thorough as the monarch CAA one in 24hrs or make extensive repatriation plans.
He just don't want to admit to spectacularly failing the staff & passengers.
What a little weasel Swaffield is.
Lassie is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 07:51
  #763 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mr Swaffield was pretty distraught on the Radio I thought. I am sure he did what he could in the situation in which he found himself. I echo those comments about managers - as one who has had to instigate and oversee redundancy etc. I can say that not all are hard hearted s*ds.

In my view Monarch were just victims of the race to the bottom. I don't want to fly every week and do so once or twice a year for "pleasure" "these days- I do want to be comfortable and be looked after. Even that is more often than when I was a young father and Cromer or Penzance once a year was the norm. But I know a young person who has been to New York with Norwegian, and Geneva and Mikonos with Easy within the last few weeks!. It is just a cheap bus that people like her require.
22/04 is online now  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 08:19
  #764 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: bishops stortford herts
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Conflating the terms & meanings of "management" I feel....When most posters on here refer to or are "blaming" management for the debacle it is understood it would be accepted that that means the v man referred to above Mr S & Greybull..That`s what is meant & it is a wee bit precious of an earlier poster (LGS6753) to assume we refer to managers who perhaps run the day to day office...& BTW we do not appreciate being referred to as idiots.. Thank you..
southside bobby is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 08:26
  #765 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think Lassie's comments are grossly unfair. I suspect that Monarch and the CAA put the plan together as a contingency - it had to some extent been rehearsed last year I imagine. But trust me you are trying to find a solution until the very last minute - last year they did cut a deal - this year unfortunately it couldn't be done. I wonder if Lassie has even been confronted with a balance sheet that isn't going to add up - then told to sort it. Sometimes you can, sometimes you can't but there are always painful decisions to be made that will often adversely affect somebody else. Of course one is well paid to do this- otherwise you wouldn't do it.
22/04 is online now  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 08:50
  #766 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, not confronted with a balance sheet but a level of human compassion that people in that particular level of management do not possess. I personally know people affected by the job losses and I find it deceitful that the people at the coal face have been manipulated into believing that the balance sheet was good & that any announcements were likely to be favourable.....not catastrophic. You are, of course, entitled to your opinion. As am I.
Lassie is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 09:02
  #767 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I do have a GCE at "A" level with a grade A pass (when GCE's were really hard at "O", and the "A" level course was two years long) in Economics. Even I struggle with complex economic situations that lead to this type of demise. Throw in "creative accounting" and other issues like fuel hedging, liquidity ratio etc and you have a mind-dumbing mine field to navigate.

I was selected for a Monarch job in the late 60's and my mate & I puzzled through the Monarch history at Companies House, in London, as we had job offers from everyone (no, no boast, just that we were exactly what everyone was looking for at the time ).

Easy to source Britannia, Fred at Laker, Courtline etc etc. All seemed above board and transparent but we just could not get to bottom line ; who owns Monarch ?

Pretty young assistant laughed off our puzzlement, told us that it would be better to invest long term career interest in someone else as Monarch looked a bit "dodgy". That was decades ago. My mate & I went separate ways with separate companies.

Monarch appears to have lurched along all this time with highly questionable management practices and ideas. Even with my "A" at grade A, I find bottom line practices very hard to fathom.

I too was in Air Europe on the last day. I too have read the book (very hard to get hold of) but the final chapters on the economic issues leave me scratching my head.

Pilots fly the plane and we hope Managers , er, manage. I think we, pilots, have a better career history.

Very sad loss.For pilots , my career and therefore focus. It is cheering to see stacks of jobs out there. Said before, by me too, guys & gals, forget what is painted on the side of a plane and be loyal to your Licence. As a "Commercial Pilot", be commercial. Get out there And make it work for you .

Very good luck to a very talented and professional pilot group.
Landflap is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 09:13
  #768 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Stralya
Posts: 71
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not sure 'ironic' is the correct word, but I was at Monarch when they organised the repatriation of some 90k XL passengers...
wondrousbitofrough is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 09:26
  #769 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting those protecting the managers. If pilots get it wrong they often loose their lives along with their passengers. They accept that the buck stops with them & take responsibility for their actions. Managers do not pay with their lives for their mistakes, but the buck still stops with them. Managers should accept that whatever the circumstances they got it wrong and it is their fault. CEO's get paid enough to take that responsibility.
IcePack is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 09:34
  #770 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: .
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BBC says repatriation will cost £60 mil for 110,000 pax. That's an average of £545 per pax. Good job the CAA are not running an airline. They would go under before Monarch!
t1grm is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 09:59
  #771 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Birmingham
Age: 60
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kungfu panda
I'm not arguing with that but the devalued pound and the uncertainty which Brexit causes preventing investors from putting fresh money into the industry doesn't help.
But but but.....Carney kept telling us the Pound was overvalued by 20% prior to 23rd June 2016
Diesel_10 is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 10:06
  #772 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: in the barrel
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BCAR Section L
Lots of high praise being thrown around here which didn't happen in the air berlin thread.
So to stop me getting confused can someone please identify what great innovative idea monarch brought to aviation that made them so good?
I guess the praise would be thrown around for any UK airline. Just a matter of more UK guys hanging out here than anyone else.
Plus, being soooo environmentalist, Germans appear to be almost happy about every airline that's going down...
Sarcastic? Maybe, but with a grain of salt.
AviatorDave is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 10:13
  #773 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Eas Anglia
Age: 64
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do we know what was based where in terms of the numbers ?
Navpi is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 11:02
  #774 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Age: 59
Posts: 2,712
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
That's an average of £545 per pax. Good job the CAA are not running an airline.
It does sound like a lot, but you would have to think that finding this amount of capacity at such short notice doesn't come cheap.

Presumably the operators providing this capacity will have also factored in empty leg/positioning costs to get the aircraft to and from where they're needed.

It seems that there has been some consolidation going on, for example, I understand that Wamos operated into MAN yesterday, with pax that originally departed from BHX and LBA being bussed to their original starting point.
Wycombe is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 11:03
  #775 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Severnside
Age: 36
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I’d say LGW 10, BHX 9, MAN 9, LTN 5, LBA 2. But stand to be corrected..?
Cozy F is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 11:21
  #776 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: cornwall, uk
Posts: 1,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jethros lists each aircraft with where it's parked
cornishsimon is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 11:21
  #777 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Managers should accept that whatever the circumstances they got it wrong and it is their fault
Generally speaking, the crew landing the aircraft were on board at wheels up, this is not the case here IMHO. Saying "this airline failed because of me" equates to "I am useless do not employ me." Management of any business is a team effort and with Monarch, there are more than a few people who made decisions which in hindsight got us here. Many are long since gone. That does not mean that Mr Swaffield should take the blame for administration. If any of us think we could have done this differently, time to take the GMAT and get that MBA to show the world.
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 11:23
  #778 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LGW
1x A320 = G-ZBAU
8x A321 = G-OZBF, G-OZBH, G-OZBI, G-OZBN, G-OZBO, G-OZBT, G-ZBAJ, G-ZBAL
BHX
2x A320 = G-ZBAH, G-ZBAT
8x A321 = G-OZBE, G-OZBL, G-OZBM, G-OZBU, G-ZBAD, G-ZBAG, G-ZBAI, G-ZBAM
1x B738 = G-ZBAV
MAN
2x A320 = G-OZBW, G-OZBY,
7x A321 = G-OZBG, G-OZBR, G-OZBZ, G-ZBAE, G-ZBAF, G-ZBAK, G-ZBAO
LTN =
2x A320 = G-OZBX, G-ZBAS
2x A321 = G-MARA, G-OJEG
LBA
2x A320 = G-ZBAP, G-ZBAR

Last edited by LBIA; 3rd Oct 2017 at 11:45.
LBIA is online now  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 11:45
  #779 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ainsdale
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
YL-LCP was also LGW Based at the time, however that has not been grounded and is operating repatriation flights.
MKY661 is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 11:46
  #780 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: solihull West Midlands
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 22/04
I think Lassie's comments are grossly unfair. I suspect that Monarch and the CAA put the plan together as a contingency - it had to some extent been rehearsed last year I imagine. But trust me you are trying to find a solution until the very last minute - last year they did cut a deal - this year unfortunately it couldn't be done. I wonder if Lassie has even been confronted with a balance sheet that isn't going to add up - then told to sort it. Sometimes you can, sometimes you can't but there are always painful decisions to be made that will often adversely affect somebody else. Of course one is well paid to do this- otherwise you wouldn't do it.
How could Monarch possibly find a solution.. admitted in their satatement theybare to loose £60 million this year and £100 million next..no one's going to take those continuing losses on !
nigel osborne is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.