Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

LHR given permission to build 3rd runway?

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

LHR given permission to build 3rd runway?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Oct 2016, 12:42
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Various at the moment
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post
Can't see our politicians out of work now can we so let the dragging on commence....
dc9-32 is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2016, 12:48
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,810
Received 199 Likes on 92 Posts
Originally Posted by jonnymac
Are the authorities aware that a new Airport is planned for the central belt in Scotland," closing and/or downgrading Glasgow and Edinburgh where expansion is impossible" with excellent road and rail links already in place, two of the longest runways in Europe, and backing from some of the largest airlines in the world, this will alter the whole economy of Scotland, and just maybe eliminate the need for any expansion in the South.
That's poppycock.

A Central Scotland Airport was "planned" more than 40 years ago. It didn't happen then and it's not going to now.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2016, 12:49
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why not somewhere like Upper Heyford ? Excellent transport links (M40 and a railway are very close), decent length of runway .... I expect to be shot down though :-)
Unixman is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2016, 12:57
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: southern spain
Posts: 1,986
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Please do not get too excited, it will not be built IMHO. I go back to the days of the Rosskill Commission in the late 1960s which recommended Cublington (near Tring in Hertfordshire). To many objections, cost etc. By all means go to the pub A30yoyo but please do not get too excited you hear now.
compton3bravo is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2016, 13:00
  #125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 542
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Quote from public press release by Government.

Expansion costs will be paid for by the private sector, not by the taxpayer. It will be for the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), as the independent industry regulator, to work with Heathrow Airport Ltd and airlines operating at the airport, on the detailed design and costs to ensure the scheme remains affordable. The government expects the industry to work together to drive down costs to benefit passengers. The aim should be to deliver a plan for expansion that keeps landing charges close to current levels.

So no cost to UK government - apart from the cost to move off the balance sheet to debt and no tax paid, keeping the dividend intact.
Trinity 09L is online now  
Old 25th Oct 2016, 13:03
  #126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: 2DME
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by eggc
I'm surprised people excited by this to be honest. The public consultation will be nasty, the eco-warriors will join in, politicians will not all support it, MAG threatening legal action, LGW will maybe follow suit...this is just the start of more decades of wrangling...no way will this runway be built by 2025, not a chance.
Public consultation will most probably consist of the Government publishing its proposal in the form of the NPS and then seeking written responses on it. The final version, taking account of responses will get published later next year and then parliament will debate it and vote on it. The majority of MPs in the House of Commons support the expansion of Heathrow so it will pass. It will then be in the hands of the Planning Inspector to decide whether the proposals are appropriate or not.

MAG would be foolish to sue and the Swampy's of this world will no doubt try and chain themselves to various trees. It did no good in the end trying to stop Manchester's second runway and will have little chance of greater success at Heathrow. Boris may even turn up to lie in front of a bulldozer too, but I suspect there would be a long line of people offering to drive the machinery...
AndrewH52 is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2016, 13:03
  #127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Clarty Waters, UK
Age: 58
Posts: 950
Received 53 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by Rivet Joint
By the way, I wouldn't be surprised to see EZY move all if not the majority of their LGW operation to LHR. You heard it here first.
No you didn't. Other's have speculated the same for several weeks. Although personally I'm not convinced.
Andy_S is online now  
Old 25th Oct 2016, 13:07
  #128 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
THIS CHANGES NOTHING!

At least a year of consultation, then a vote, then protests, then a post brexit Uk. Meanwhile the far east will have built half a dozen airports in that time.

If anyone thinks LHR will ever get a new runway they are living in cloud cuckoo land.
hampshireandy is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2016, 13:22
  #129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Oban, Scotland
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rivet Joint. I won't waste my time arguing BREXIT, but perhaps you could explain why we have any right to reclaim our position as the Hub of the world. Britain (not London) became the hub of the world on the basis of Naval Power, the slave trade and the creation of the industrial revolution. All a long way in the past. We have been living well beyond our means for at least a century and are now a heavily-indebted island, and hence dependent on the grace and favour of others.
inOban is online now  
Old 25th Oct 2016, 13:25
  #130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bolton ENGLAND
Age: 78
Posts: 1,103
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Hope it is never built. It is not needed............. Expansion for expansion sake..

Last edited by Planemike; 25th Oct 2016 at 14:48.
Planemike is online now  
Old 25th Oct 2016, 13:30
  #131 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Clarty Waters, UK
Age: 58
Posts: 950
Received 53 Likes on 29 Posts
So why do LHR slots change hands for so much money?
Andy_S is online now  
Old 25th Oct 2016, 13:30
  #132 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
River Joint you really are a nasty little man. I don't not care if I get suspended for saying so. In many threads across these boards you are so negative and vitriolic about your petty hates. LGW is far from a dump. You insult the 40 million people who use it every year.
vectisman is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2016, 13:35
  #133 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AndrewH52. You make it sound a straightforward process. Might there not be the little matter of legal challenges and court hearings given that 4 councils and probably others have promised action.
I'm not sure at what stage they could start but I suspect they will all add to the time and could even be successful.
MANFOD is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2016, 13:37
  #134 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the authorities aware that a new Airport is planned for the central belt in Scotland," closing and/or downgrading Glasgow and Edinburgh where expansion is impossible" w
Really? Glasgow and Edinburgh are not that highly utilised compared with Heathrow. And this grand scheme has been thought up and discarded before. The time to have acted would have been 30 or more years ago when both GLA and EDI were a lot smaller and in public hands (smaller in terms of terminals and pax numbers) and transatlantic traffic was forced to go from or via PIK.

I suspect that given the embarrassment of the possible future liability on the Scottish public purse at PIK that Holyrood would be more likely to find a reason to close GLA on some pretext and force its traffic down to PIK !
Dryce is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2016, 13:46
  #135 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,795
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
If construction of a third runway at Heathrow would mean the demolition of 750 homes and an enormously speculative and ruinously expensive 'M25 tunnel' (what a terrorist target that would be ), yet the alternative at Gatwick would not - then there can be no justification for choosing LHR.

A high speed rail link between the 2 airports is needed though.
BEagle is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2016, 13:47
  #136 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Middlesesx
Posts: 2,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On a positive note I look forward to BA moving the Beach Fleet from LGW to LHR. It will be so much easier for staff travel, however at my age I do need this to be completed by 2025.

On another point I do wish threaders would resort from childish insults and vitriolic comments, many of you live nowhere near LHR / LGW and probably merely fly when you go on holiday. Your professed knowledge of people living in the airport environment and the vast benefits they are in receipt of surprise me. I must assume you personally know residents, airport staff and crew.
HZ123 is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2016, 13:48
  #137 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let the gruesome legal battle over Heathrow commence | Coffee House

Good piece about how M'Learned Friends milk a system where politicians gave up their responsibilities.
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2016, 13:55
  #138 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A high speed link (= 20 mins) would be most helpful.
msjh is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2016, 13:56
  #139 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Think of the positive news from this decision - Zac Goldsmith is going to resign as an MP!

As an aside to this - with British Airways becoming more and more London centric (I live in the SE of the UK but very, very rarely use Heathrow and/or BA) could BA perhaps consider renaming themselves London Airways or South-East Airlines or something similarily appropriate?

PS Just being cheeky before someone kicks off and calls me anti-BA etc, etc.
Cuillin Hills is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2016, 13:59
  #140 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Qwerty
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What purpose would a rail link between Heathrow and Gatwick serve?

No way would I fly part way around the World to Heathrow to collect my baggage, get on a train, check in at Gatwick, go through security to get on another aircraft to fly to my final destination.
Council Van is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.