Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

Retro painted aircraft

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Retro painted aircraft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Jun 2016, 13:01
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: eastcoastoz
Age: 76
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice pic, PAXboy.
That's the scheme used when QF's 707s entered service - 1959, I think.
Stanwell is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2016, 15:11
  #22 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,150
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Thanks Stanwell. It's the first time I've used the new picture attachment and the size limitations got me but if you click on the thumbnail, it opens OK.

I had just arrived at BNE from CNS and was walking to a connection when I saw it and took a quick snap.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2016, 19:03
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: London,England
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The only decent one I have seen so far is the Lufty A321, looks lovely.
Max Angle is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2016, 01:37
  #24 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blighty
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Would it be possible to gently nudge the subject towards *why* an airline would choose to paint an aircraft in retro livery from a business perspective, rather than talking about what livery one particularly likes visually ?
davidjohnson6 is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2016, 04:39
  #25 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,150
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
I think Shamrock answered that in post #13. Publicity, nothing else. Amending old schemes to new shaped aircraft and making a one off is money. Nothing short of a big anniversary or the Olympics will prise the money out of the Board. Then the PR dept have to work very hard to prove that it did justify the cost.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2016, 06:34
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by davidjohnson6
Would it be possible to gently nudge the subject towards *why* an airline would choose to paint an aircraft in retro livery from a business perspective, rather than talking about what livery one particularly likes visually ?
Painting an aircraft in a retro scheme immediately differentiates your airline from upstart competitors who haven't been around long enough to have been through any changes of livery.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2016, 07:32
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: jersey
Age: 74
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
True, but that hasn't stopped the "stampede" to EZY,RYR & WZZ.
kcockayne is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2016, 10:43
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: u.k.
Age: 56
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Max Angle
The only decent one I have seen so far is the Lufty A321, looks lovely.

And you have not seen the 747-800 in the 1968 scheme of their first jumbo? It is a classic look , when airline livery included cheatlines...remember them?
getonittt is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2016, 08:54
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,659
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by PAXboy
If BA were to join the fashion for old paint jobs - none would predate the 1974 merger. Simple fact of life.
Not so
https://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgu...act=mrc&uact=8

In fact some are arguably still present today, for example if you board a BA flight numbered below BA300, you're flying what would have been a BOAC route, and if your flight number is odd then you're outbound from LHR. Conversely, you're on a route in BEA's empire if it's BA300 and upwards, and outbounds are even numbered.
Actually that's not quite the case; BA flights were renumbered into this series some time in the early 1980s. BOAC and initial BA longhaul flights had quite high flight numbers - transatlantics were numbered in the BA500 and upwards, while Australia was BA900 and up. I'm not sure if there was an effort to avoid duplication between BEA and BOAC.
WHBM is online now  
Old 17th Jun 2016, 10:01
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by WHBM
Actually that's not quite the case; BA flights were renumbered into this series some time in the early 1980s. BOAC and initial BA longhaul flights had quite high flight numbers - transatlantics were numbered in the BA500 and upwards, while Australia was BA900 and up. I'm not sure if there was an effort to avoid duplication between BEA and BOAC.
That's true, in fact I seem to recall that BA went through several iterations before settling on the current schema that puts shorthaul and longhaul routes in completely separate flight number ranges.

I should add, of course that the BA300+ demarcation only applies to Heathrow routes and not to Gatwick services, nor obviously to marketing flight numbers on codeshare flights.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2016, 13:05
  #31 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,150
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
WHBM, I take your point but I was referring to the grand merger that was made in 1974. Given that BA has a considerable preponderance of lh routes, it would be very confusing for the pax. As we saw with the multi-coloured 'ethnic livery' tails. I was one of the few who thought it brilliant.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2016, 20:29
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Quiet spot
Age: 74
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by davidjohnson6
Every now and again, a major airline will decide to paint one of its aircraft in a livery dating back maybe 50 years.
Clearly aircraft need to be repainted on a regular basis to keep up a polished image and avoid passengers linking peeling/fading paint with poor quality aircraft maintenance.

Yes the spotter side of me likes seeing the odd retro livery but there is presumably a higher cost for the paint shop to use a retro livery rather than the standard livery and there is a risk some passengers will think that a 50 year old aircraft is still being used. Most passengers don't spend much time spotting or looking at aircraft photos.

So why do airlines choose to paint aircraft in retro livery ? Some senior manager presumably has to authorise the cost and non-standard image. "Because it looks pretty" probably isn't a sufficiently good reason for the deviation from normal corporate process.
Interesting that commercial aviation is not alone in occasionally recognising significant 'heritage' moments whilst strengthening it's current brand image.
GBrf the rail freight company has finished its final Class 66 loco delivery in the Brunswick Green livery of steam loco Standard Class 9F 'Evening Star' a type that hauled heavy freight and was the final steam loco built in Britain.
The 9F now resides in the NRM York where it may be joined in forty years by the American built diesel loco, which according to press reports has already been gifted for future preservation.
I guess it will outlive most of today's airliners too.
Preon is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2016, 06:10
  #33 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,150
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
I saw reference to a new one-off paint scheme that KLM has done for Kings Day. This followed some PR research and you can search for their 777-306ER PH-BVA and it's orange makeover, rolled out a few days ago. I think it looks very good but you get an idea of the cost when the article said:
It took a team of 35 people four days to spray on the orange livery, with 335 litres of paint used.
Not to mention having the machine off the line for four days! Leave alone the design and planning cost.

Of course, nowadays there is the whole YouTube timelapse promotion and so on to gain extra value but the PR people have to be sure of their ground. (pun intended )
PAXboy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.