Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

MANCHESTER 1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th May 2016, 10:28
  #4921 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would Iran Air not count as a potential Middle Eastern carrier?
Quite possibly the return of Mahan? Weren't they doing quite well until forcibly withdrawn?
Betablockeruk is offline  
Old 16th May 2016, 10:34
  #4922 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,497
Received 162 Likes on 87 Posts
What's BOB?
TURIN is offline  
Old 16th May 2016, 10:39
  #4923 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: London
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Buy on Board"
fjencl is online now  
Old 16th May 2016, 20:32
  #4924 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dozens of MPs urge the Government to agree on a third runway for Heathrow by the end of July



Hope employees of Manchester Airport are reading.

#GrahamBrady

Nothing short of bizarre that a Mancunian MP is so evangelical about Heathrow. He was even main sponsor WHY ?


http://www.parliament.uk/edm/2015-16/1162

Last edited by Bagso; 17th May 2016 at 12:35.
Bagso is offline  
Old 17th May 2016, 07:06
  #4925 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Beyond the Blue Horizon
Age: 63
Posts: 1,257
Received 151 Likes on 94 Posts
Bagso
Good to see Oman Air coming to Manchester (it was a well kept secret as I have been working in Oman at the airport) and nobody said anything there !
Good carrier in my admittedly limited experience.
As for MP and 3rd runway I think they will see what happens post referendum, if we vote to leave will there be the demand long term ? Just a thought, and as for banning night flights what will happen to those early morning arrivals at around 5.00pm as you are already towed to the ramp rather than taxi under own power, or at least we were on my last visit which I agree was some years ago now.


Regards
Mr Mac
Mr Mac is offline  
Old 17th May 2016, 11:36
  #4926 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The detailed April stats are now on the MAN web site.

http://mag-umbraco-media-live.s3.ama...ffic-stats.pdf
MANFOD is offline  
Old 17th May 2016, 12:25
  #4927 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 377
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very encouraging figures. It doesn't seem all that long ago when "Charter" was easily the largest trqffic category every month, lead by names like Dan air, Laker, Britannia, British Airtours, Caledonian and so many more.
How times and the market have changed !
Logohu is offline  
Old 17th May 2016, 19:24
  #4928 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orlando
Age: 52
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just read this on another aviation website, so cannot confirm, but sound interesting:

Apparently Norwegian have put stand requests in for 4 based B737-800 and 2 B787-8 from March 2017.
european130 is offline  
Old 17th May 2016, 20:02
  #4929 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it possible Manchester could become slot constrained hence the gold rush for growth?

Clearly not after 10am and by 1400 it can be incredibly quiet. But Manchester is the type of airport where market forces determine an early morning operation.
Bagso is offline  
Old 17th May 2016, 21:17
  #4930 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Apparently Norwegian have put stand requests in for 4 based B737-800 and 2 B787-8 from March 2017.
I hope that MAG has contingency plans to provide an incremental apron extension with some urgency. Other carriers are believed to be interested in increasing based units too, and new services such as the Oman Air schedule must be accommodated also. The new stands being constructed to the NW of T2 are required for TP-generated overspill. There is a pressing need to provide more aircraft stands for underlying expansion of schedules in addition to these. The T3 capacity issue has already been raised on here. T1 is headed for a stand-availability crunch as well.
Shed-on-a-Pole is offline  
Old 17th May 2016, 21:20
  #4931 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Home away from home
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stand availability seems tight overnight. During the day there are throughs but I think more based aircraft at the moment would be hard unless carriers agree to do more bussing on a daily basis. Already there are issues with widebody stands, causing things like the Cathay being towed of to allow singapore on, or forcing widebodies onto remote because of lack of contact stands.

There are definitly times when there is capacity, but also times when there doesn't seem to be. The good bit is most of the time there seems to be runway capacity (although at times there might be capacity issues in or out, but rarely both at once) but then if you've got no stands available that doesn't help. Also eventually ground capacity will probably be the limiting factor.

Now all of the above is completely my own speculation and could be completely wrong.

Norwegian moving in would be an interesting move. However to fight what battle? Go head to head against Thomas Cook on long haul to the US? Fight ryanair, easyjet, thomson, monarch and jet2 to spain and the canaries? I'm sure there are places left to fill in the market, but I also fear a blood bath if too many carriers move in once the inevitable dip in the economy comes again.
Crazy Voyager is offline  
Old 17th May 2016, 22:05
  #4932 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Leeds
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shed-on-a-Pole
I hope that MAG has contingency plans to provide an incremental apron extension with some urgency. Other carriers are believed to be interested in increasing based units too, and new services such as the Oman Air schedule must be accommodated also. The new stands being constructed to the NW of T2 are required for TP-generated overspill. There is a pressing need to provide more aircraft stands for underlying expansion of schedules in addition to these. The T3 capacity issue has already been raised on here. T1 is headed for a stand-availability crunch as well.
Shed

Do you know which carriers? If it is the locos then it can probay be addressed by an extension to terminal 3 to the north? My feeling is that in 10 years we will see plans to demolish and redevelop this site as well so anything done here can be reasonably inexpensive.

An alternative to provide more contact stands would be to build the 4th finger pier of the extended T2 which is currently planned to be non contact stand (the area currently/recently used as a car park).

If runway capacity becomes an issue, surely things can be done to increase this (e.g. Air traffic controll procedures, landing aids, taxiways, crossing points)?
Dobbo_Dobbo is offline  
Old 18th May 2016, 10:37
  #4933 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice to see the area reclaimed from car parking at the end of T2 being used by aircraft again yesterday. Are there any more car parks in that area for the chop?

Last edited by doublesix; 18th May 2016 at 10:52. Reason: Missing letter
doublesix is offline  
Old 18th May 2016, 10:49
  #4934 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: manchester
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
between there and the M56
GavinC is offline  
Old 18th May 2016, 19:56
  #4935 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Middlesex (under the flightpath)
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There have been rumours of Oman Air but daily flights is a bit of a surprise.

What aircraft type will it likely be?
This very good news indeed. Just GF needed now to get the set.


I'm not surprised. I think Oman realize they are the "Johnny come lately" and if they are going to make any inroads at all into the well established turf of the MEB3, Turkish, PIA etc they need to at least have a daily offering. Get ready for some bargain prices to the subcontinent if you're into that sort of thing !
Yes, and it makes direct flights to India less likely. Also there's potential for leisure pax to BKK, or possibly a niche service of some sort with a different USP to the others.

Also the new MCT terminal should be open by now, else very soon, and this should be a more pleasant and less crowded experience than changing planes in DXB.


Dozens of MPs urge the Government to agree on a third runway for Heathrow by the end of July



Hope employees of Manchester Airport are reading.

#GrahamBrady

Nothing short of bizarre that a Mancunian MP is so evangelical about Heathrow. He was even main sponsor WHY ?


Early day motion 1162 - FINAL DECISION ON AIRPORT EXPANSION IN LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST - UK Parliament
Actually makes very good sense, and very overdue, but don't hold your breath.

If a decision was going to be made, it would have been done at the start of the new government (this time last year), once the "pesky Libdems" were out of the way.

Basically, they've wasted millions on the Davis Commission for no good reason.......


As for MP and 3rd runway I think they will see what happens post referendum, if we vote to leave will there be the demand long term ?
Of course there will, membership of the EU or not has no bearing on this.
Fairdealfrank is offline  
Old 18th May 2016, 20:16
  #4936 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Manchester
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, and it makes direct flights to India less likely.
In the same way that having a plethora of airlines providing links over their hubs to Hong Kong and China has stopped Cathay Pacific start non-stop to Hong Kong with Hainan Airlines to Beijing from June (and may be Xi'an next year) with a nod and a wink for Air China to Shanghai?
Ringwayman is offline  
Old 18th May 2016, 21:46
  #4937 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 377
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the same way that having a plethora of airlines providing links over their hubs to Hong Kong and China has stopped Cathay Pacific start non-stop to Hong Kong with Hainan Airlines to Beijing from June (and may be Xi'an next year) with a nod and a wink for Air China to Shanghai?
Agreed. The hub operators don't seem to have deterred direct services to Pakistan either with PIA and Shaheen now offering what, 11 flights a week between them ? It all comes down to market size and I'm sure a direct flight to India will follow one day. In the meantime we have Goa already, but only seasonal
Logohu is offline  
Old 19th May 2016, 19:18
  #4938 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Leeds
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ringwayman
In the same way that having a plethora of airlines providing links over their hubs to Hong Kong and China has stopped Cathay Pacific start non-stop to Hong Kong with Hainan Airlines to Beijing from June (and may be Xi'an next year) with a nod and a wink for Air China to Shanghai?
Agree. My view is that sucess breeds sucess.

A plethora of passengers going MAN-India (or wherever) via Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Doha, Onan serves to prove that underlying demand for the route is there.

In this instance I would hope to see that the Chinese carriers entering the market will stimulate Cathay Pacific and Singapore's proposed improvements. In time I hope it will stimulate the Japanese carriers, as well as some of the other far eastern carriers.
Dobbo_Dobbo is offline  
Old 20th May 2016, 15:26
  #4939 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VS New York possibly as early as October is the latest I've heard!!
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 20th May 2016, 15:35
  #4940 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Given you are usually spot on with your info Spanners, I'm going to say that sounds pretty certain.

Would this be at the expense of delta however, or an addition?

I believe Delta will be B767 but 5 weekly for some part of the winter, so, could VS be backfilling the capacity?

What I would also like VS to do is utilise the 2nd based A330 a bit more in the summer.

As it stands, it does 3 weekly LAS in the summer peak, and just sits at MAN for 4 days a week doing nothing. The A340-600 did exactly the same last summer. Surely there must be something they can use that A330 on? Even if it's a 2nd daily ATL, JFK or more MCO. People love the house of the mouse.
LAX_LHR is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.