MANCHESTER 1
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 2 DME
Age: 54
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Who's panicking? The point is that the new development won't add much in the way of apron capacity so in a scenario where stand availability is already an issue at times, it can only get worse in the short to medium term. I don't think some people have appreciated yet how disruptive the remodelling and reconfiguration process might be, especially airside.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Relocate the cargo centre to the other side of Altrincham road (cargo city, plenty of room left !!) only the bonded warehouse actually needs to be close to the apron. Then concrete the whole area doubling the size of the west apron. Then while you are at it carry on around sun bank lane relocate the RVP to south side and concrete that area as well. That should sort out the lack of stands, come to think of it you could fit a lot of cars on that space ! 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: manchester
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Transformation Master Plan / Planning App
I think it's worth bearing in mind that MAN need to play the planning 'game' at this point and are doing it well so far.
Firstly, they need to get cracking with the proposals but that needs permission. So why put the whole thing in in one go and have a drawn out planning process when you can apply for a nil net gain application to kick start the T2 main body works and put in other applications later? this is what they are doing.
Let's not forget that whilst a lot of people on these forums want to see big expansion, lobbying groups who don't like airports such as environmental groups will find it hard to object to a planning application that reduces floor space and provides one additional stand (ignoring the permission for the extension of the apron).
So MAN will hopefully get this application through in double quick time. How can they not do? And that will allow for spades in the ground as soon as they want. The applications for the additional piers and other works can follow as they become ready. Bear in mind that there has not been long to produce this work.
So let's be pleased that this first (of many) application has gone in and works are imminent. The proposal will give MAN a fit for purpose T2 main building on which they can add a series of new piers to accommodate growth.
And yes, there will undoubtedly will be a lot of bussing from T2 onto the new remote stands near the M56 for years to come but that's fine as we will get something special by the end of it.
Firstly, they need to get cracking with the proposals but that needs permission. So why put the whole thing in in one go and have a drawn out planning process when you can apply for a nil net gain application to kick start the T2 main body works and put in other applications later? this is what they are doing.
Let's not forget that whilst a lot of people on these forums want to see big expansion, lobbying groups who don't like airports such as environmental groups will find it hard to object to a planning application that reduces floor space and provides one additional stand (ignoring the permission for the extension of the apron).
So MAN will hopefully get this application through in double quick time. How can they not do? And that will allow for spades in the ground as soon as they want. The applications for the additional piers and other works can follow as they become ready. Bear in mind that there has not been long to produce this work.
So let's be pleased that this first (of many) application has gone in and works are imminent. The proposal will give MAN a fit for purpose T2 main building on which they can add a series of new piers to accommodate growth.
And yes, there will undoubtedly will be a lot of bussing from T2 onto the new remote stands near the M56 for years to come but that's fine as we will get something special by the end of it.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree that this is a very sensible approach. One query. The planning documents are inconsistent on when the apron extension (over Staff West etc) for which they already have planning consent will be done. I presume it will be part of the first works as implied on the plans but can anyone confirm
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well something of a handbrake turn as I recall EDI initially supporting Davies ? ( I think).
Amazing what the sniff of long haul does !
Good to see at least one airport responding to Heathrow decision in robust and unequivocal no compromising manner!
Call for Scotland to 'rethink' relationship with London airports - BBC News
Wakes Wakey MAG !
Amazing what the sniff of long haul does !
Good to see at least one airport responding to Heathrow decision in robust and unequivocal no compromising manner!
Call for Scotland to 'rethink' relationship with London airports - BBC News
Wakes Wakey MAG !
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gavin, let me get this right. The Terminal upgrade will be made by putting many applications in as they go along? Does this mean that planning permission will be sought for each pier etc?
Well something of a handbrake turn as I recall EDI initially supporting Davies ? ( I think).
Mr Dewar (formerly BAA) would be well advised to stop preaching about others and :
1) Sort out the calamitous lesson in how not to project manage anything they called their new security hall
2) Pour some concrete
Anyone have a link to the most up to date images of the MAN master plan? In terms of strategic planning, MAN are way ahead of EDI here.
Last edited by Skipness One Foxtrot; 14th Dec 2015 at 16:21.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: manchester
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BDLBOS,
I would expect quite a few applications but perhaps not one per pier. The plans show up to four piers but I suspect the one nearest the M56 will be last as that area will be used for bussing so I could see an application for two or three of them at once with the other(s) to follow.
I could also see a separate application for the T2-T1 link, for demolition of bits of T3 and quite a few for other, smaller changes.
Overall, perhaps we'll see another 3-4 big applications with many smaller ones including amendments.
I would expect quite a few applications but perhaps not one per pier. The plans show up to four piers but I suspect the one nearest the M56 will be last as that area will be used for bussing so I could see an application for two or three of them at once with the other(s) to follow.
I could also see a separate application for the T2-T1 link, for demolition of bits of T3 and quite a few for other, smaller changes.
Overall, perhaps we'll see another 3-4 big applications with many smaller ones including amendments.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: manchester
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I suspect there will be an application for the piers though as I believe the consent is outline for the extension of the originally proposed T2. The alignment is now completely different so I expect it to go in as a new application or material amendment.
It may also be that we see something go in up to the previously approved number of stands and a second application for additional.
What I think is clear given what they have just put in is that they will try and use nil detriment / already consented to get a lot through before they have to start to show how material increases are mitigated for etc....
It's exciting times in any case.
It may also be that we see something go in up to the previously approved number of stands and a second application for additional.
What I think is clear given what they have just put in is that they will try and use nil detriment / already consented to get a lot through before they have to start to show how material increases are mitigated for etc....
It's exciting times in any case.
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Easyjets only route there too, nice little route. Montenegro Airways were due to launch said route last year, so great to finally have an option.