Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

MANCHESTER 1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Jun 2016, 11:49
  #5121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: U.K
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MAG has tried to persuade carriers to relocate but they won't
BA, along with American have requested a move to T2, but the airport were unwilling to provide domestic arrival facilities for BA.
The96er is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 11:52
  #5122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks The96er, that's very interesting. It will be useful to note whether this can be facilitated as the TP starts to take shape. Once US PDC is established, MAG will want AAL at T2 anyway. Can the Shuttle be accommodated in some way also?
Shed-on-a-Pole is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 12:27
  #5123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Leeds
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It would be good if BA and AA moved to T2 - which I feel they are almost certain to do at some point.

The U.S. Pre clearance facility could be very busy with TCX, AA, UA and in particular VS/DL's plans for US routes from MAN.

Although not currently planned, I think there might be a need for that fourth finger pier.
Dobbo_Dobbo is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 12:34
  #5124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Warrington
Age: 74
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I I believe Pier 4 is in the plans but was just not included in the 'fly through' video.
Sholto Douglas is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 12:56
  #5125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As far as I'm aware, the new T2 is to have a domestic exit point, and the plan is that all barring Ryanair and flybe will be using T2 in the future.

T3 is going to be the same equivalent as CPH-go, the low cost terminal with an airside link for flybe/long haul carrier transfers.
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 12:57
  #5126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I will not use Manchester if my flight involves departing from Terminal 3. Too many bad experiences.

I would be back to using Manchester again if BA moved to Terminal 2.

On another note, a friend of mine missed his Jet2 flight to Barcelona from Terminal 1 this morning. He checked in on time and dropped his baggage off which was tagged and accepted. Then he went to security and it took so long to get through he missed his flight!
Ametyst1 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 13:37
  #5127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: stockport
Posts: 494
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have never ever had a problem at T3

Ian
chaps1954 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 13:55
  #5128 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: London, UK & Europe
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA, along with American have requested a move to T2, but the airport were unwilling to provide domestic arrival facilities for BA.
What sort of works would be required to give BA what they want and cost wise would it be big.
j636 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 14:19
  #5129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Code:
What sort of works would be required to give BA what they want and cost wise would it be big.
The terminal was devised in era when people actually put their luggage in the hold where its meant to be !

So no stupid mile deep security areas were ever envisaged !

The design was such as to reduce kerb/aircraft paths to a minimum, with customs/immigration on separate floor for ease of flow.

The idea of common airside for domestic/international was largely pie in sky (it exists today for commercial/shopping however does result in the so called need for uptime further security checks downline)

This terminal as is needs an extensive rethink to even come close to current security demands and it ain't simply in the floor space.

Adding further domestic channels and requisite sterile paths makes it even more difficult to meet Home Office/DFT standards.

Pretty much the same can be said in reverse for T3 a primarily domestic terminal forced into multi use for commercial reasons.

If people, airports and indeed so called security experts really was to tackle the queues and especially after the Brussels incident recently we need to force passengers to once again have their luggage (ALL apart for a hand bag/Laptop)
checked and screened and placed in the hold period.

This would return some sense of normality to the departing experience .
rutankrd is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 14:47
  #5130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: England
Age: 59
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ametyst1

Your a very unlucky dude - and so is your friend.

MM
mickyman is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 14:58
  #5131 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My friend isn't unlucky he is furious as it has cost him a further £262 to get to his final destination and he has been delayed 2 days.

I am not unlucky, I am a very frequent traveller who will only put up with a bad experience for so long. So, if more suitable alternatives come along then I will use them.

I don't mind arriving into Terminal 3, so I quite fly out of Liverpool, Birmingham or Heathrow and fly back into Manchester dependent on my business needs.

For instance, in July, I am flying out of Heathrow to Frankfurt (mainly because of ridiculously high Lufthansa fares from Manchester) and then back from Hamburg to Manchester.
Ametyst1 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 15:27
  #5132 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ametyst1 - it's very simple to miss a flight, even if you check in on time. If your friend checked-in 40 minutes before his flight, and then was stuck in security for 20 minutes (nothing unusual about that), then the chances are he'd miss the flight.

Nothing unique to Manchester about this.
rkenyon is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 15:28
  #5133 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North, UK
Age: 67
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a frequent traveller through Manchester I find it strange your friend missed his flight because of security. On several recent occasions when I have queued there has been people going down the lines calling out flights due to depart and moving people to the front of the queue to ensure they get through in time.

Also a 2 day delay for a destination with many departures, sounds strange.
pwalhx is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 15:53
  #5134 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: stockport
Posts: 494
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ametyst doesn`t like Manchester we know because every post is anti


Ian
chaps1954 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 16:20
  #5135 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kerry Eire
Age: 76
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rutankrd if you or anyone else thinks my £5000+ worth of camera gear which fits neatly into a backpack weighing 6.8 kilos and has travelled all over the world with me is going into any aircraft hold, you have another think coming. The hold IS the place for luggage but a combination of loaders who sling bags into containers, and in any order, and ever increasing hold luggage charges ensure that only my suitcase goes under the floor.

In case anyone thinks I'm attacking MAN, I have been a supporter of the airport for over 60 years and served on committees which helped promote the airport in the days of Gordon Sweetapple and Gil Thompson, both of whom I knew well and would likely be delighted, as I am, to see the airport prospering but would be wringing their hands at the chaos the lack of development coupled with the increase in security have visited on the operation for which they fought so hard.
philbky is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 16:41
  #5136 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rkenyon

It is quite simple he was in the security queue for 45 minutes, and he had a connecting onto South America not staying in Barcelona
Ametyst1 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 16:42
  #5137 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Age: 51
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is always a case for hold luggage, like your scenario, but think the point being made was it's far more wide spread now than it ever was due to extra charges for hold luggage, and ease and cost of short breaks...which has cabin luggage capacities at breaking point, all of which has to travel through terminal security.
eggc is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 16:49
  #5138 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Code:
rutankrd if you or anyone else thinks my £5000+ worth of camera gear which fits neatly into a backpack weighing 6.8 kilos and has travelled all over the world with me is going into any aircraft hold, you have another think coming. The hold IS the place for luggage but a combination of loaders who sling bags into containers, and in any order, and ever increasing hold luggage charges ensure that only my suitcase goes under the floor.
Actually i quite understand with your concern especially with specialist equipment such as camera/video/audio equipment.

As for charges well I think they should actually be reversed !

A set weight in hold included in ticket price by legislation however additional carryon (Your camera equipment for instance) charged and insured for after all thats has a real cost in time and processing and hand searching through security !

As for your comments re the elder statesmen that ensured Ringways success think we agree on that.

The last seven years or so haven't been the best for resilient development strategies , yet heavier and heavier government enforced must be seen to be doing something security requirements have seriously effected the structural operations of many airport buildings.

Such as multiple screening even of domestic and EU traffic , segregation of arriving and departing passengers.

IMO Those requirements and the necessary structural changes should have been paid for out of taxation (ADP) at the dedicated airports !

What do you think ?

Really hope that TP gets underway soon.
rutankrd is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 16:56
  #5139 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chaps

I do like Manchester. I don't like incompetence caused by under investment or bad management.

Manchester used to be a World Class Airport and it should be again. It is a shame we have to wait 10 years to see any substantial improvement.
Ametyst1 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 16:57
  #5140 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old adage, "leave time for the unexpected when about to fly"


It is quite simple he was in the security queue for 45 minutes, and he had a connecting onto South America not staying in Barcelona[/QUOTE]
wools is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.