Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

LUTON -8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Sep 2016, 19:40
  #4861 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: EGGW
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
runway08

To answer your Fedex question, it will be a No.
Mr @ Spotty M is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2016, 10:46
  #4862 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: London
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could the recent Jet2 announcement of a base at STN potentially deliver a benefit to LTN's long term growth?

By which I mean, once LTN's expansion works are largely complete, might EZY decide to leave Ryanair and Jet2 to fight it out at STN and consolidate operations at LTN?

It could allow some routes which EZY doesn't currently serve to commence and others to expand. Just a thought
wallp is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2016, 11:40
  #4863 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Norwich
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unlikely wallp, but maybe we could see EL Al going back to STN
nt639 is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2016, 11:45
  #4864 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: LTN
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To answer your Fedex question, it will be a No.
Thats a real shame, Are all the Fedex Airbus done also?
runway08 is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2016, 13:04
  #4865 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wallp
Could the recent Jet2 announcement of a base at STN potentially deliver a benefit to LTN's long term growth?

By which I mean, once LTN's expansion works are largely complete, might EZY decide to leave Ryanair and Jet2 to fight it out at STN and consolidate operations at LTN?

It could allow some routes which EZY doesn't currently serve to commence and others to expand. Just a thought
Totally agree with this even more so with the Jet.2 announcement, leave them to it and concentrate on Luton! easyJet will never be able complete unless it offers a wider range of route with decent frequencies which it won't as it had been scaling back Stansted operations for some time now.
AvGeek1 is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2016, 13:19
  #4866 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: London
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nt639
Unlikely wallp, but maybe we could see EL Al going back to STN
Why would they switch back to STN? LTN is far more convenient for their core market
wallp is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2016, 13:25
  #4867 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: London
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AvGeek1
Totally agree with this even more so with the Jet.2 announcement, leave them to it and concentrate on Luton! easyJet will never be able complete unless it offers a wider range of route with decent frequencies which it won't as it had been scaling back Stansted operations for some time now.
Agreed. Routes like Asturias, Bilbao and Prague which EZY don't currently have in their Luton schedule would fit in well and they could really take on Vueling by adding frequencies to Amsterdam and Barcelona and growing other routes like Glasgow, Munich etc.
wallp is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2016, 13:35
  #4868 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 35,000ft
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So IF easy up their game at LTN by moving routes from Stansted, doesn't LTN then risk the same, that is, pushing airlines such as Vueling or even Wizz away to say STN/LGW? Surely this 'theory' that Jet2 setting up shop at STN will push airlines away, would have the same effect at LTN if easy became more 'dominant'?
pamann is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2016, 14:00
  #4869 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wallp

Agreed. Routes like Asturias, Bilbao and Prague which EZY don't currently have in their Luton schedule would fit in well and they could really take on Vueling by adding frequencies to Amsterdam and Barcelona and growing other routes like Glasgow, Munich etc.
Why do you ask questions on here when you have your own answers and reasoning's already?

Pardon my ignorance but why would there be an appetite for EZY to move those routes you've suggested from STN over to LTN in light of today's Jet2 announcement?

I find it very unlikely Jet2 will be flying to Asturias, Bilbao etc. OK Prague possibly if they choose to add to the Jet2 Citybreak offering as well.

If anything I'd expect Malaga, Palma, Ibiza from EZY's STN network would get the chop. But equally, it could go the other way.

As we've discussed countless times now, if EZY felt they'd get more yield operating those routes from LTN then they would do so!

They are certainly not just going to shift routes over to please LTN fanboys on here who for some god forsaken reason would like to see EZY consolidated at LTN because like has also been discussed... there is little if any commercial gain in doing so.

I'm never one to rule anything out... but I really struggle to see any credible reasoning from your posts, just wishful thinking.
FRatSTN is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2016, 14:13
  #4870 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 35,000ft
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FRatSTN
Wallp



Why do you ask questions on here when you have your own answers and reasoning's already?

Pardon my ignorance but why would there be an appetite for EZY to move those routes you've suggested from STN over to LTN in light of today's Jet2 announcement?

I find it very unlikely Jet2 will be flying to Asturias, Bilbao etc. OK Prague possibly if they choose to add to the Jet2 Citybreak offering as well.

If anything I'd expect Malaga, Palma, Ibiza from EZY's STN network would get the chop. But equally, it could go the other way.

As we've discussed countless times now, if EZY felt they'd get more yield operating those routes from LTN then they would do so!

They are certainly not just going to shift routes over to please LTN fanboys on here who for some god forsaken reason would like to see EZY consolidated at LTN because like has also been discussed... there is little if any commercial gain in doing so.

I'm never one to rule anything out... but I really struggle to see any credible reasoning from your posts, just wishful thinking.
Couldn't agree more FRatSTN!

There's going to be a fair bit of 'sour grapes' and 'clutching at straws' over this announcement. If Jet2 had announced LTN as their new base, would anyone be suggesting that ZB or EZY might shut up shop and move their operation elsewhere?

This forum is so unbelievably predictable when it comes to certain threads and those who post.
pamann is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2016, 14:17
  #4871 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Putting easyJet's Stansted operations aside, at this current stage easyJet should be concentrating on adding more frequencies to specific routes either to keep up with competition, increase passengers numbers or to offer more convenient timings. Services like Zurich, Munich, Madrid, Ibiza, Hamburg, Dubrovnik & Porto could all do with this.

Obviously easyJet has a good operation at Stansted as stated by some on the Stansted thread but I still can't see it. The base will just keep shrinking for example as you said if Prague is added by Jet2 it will be a blow to easyJet and they'll end the route and shrink the base yet again.

Don't you see the pattern? easyJet have added routes like Naples, Munich, Split, Copenhagen & Dubrovnik to its Luton base that were all operated from Stansted before and the Stansted routes have suffered with Copenhagen gone and the other routes reduced in frequency.

Last edited by AvGeek1; 8th Sep 2016 at 14:49.
AvGeek1 is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2016, 14:24
  #4872 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 35,000ft
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is also worth noting is that with the down turn in demand for places like Egypt, Tunisia, Turkey etc... There is now an increase in demand for the more 'traditional' offerings of ALC, AGP, PMI, FAO, Greece etc...

Time will tell.
pamann is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2016, 14:32
  #4873 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AvGeek1

How do you know that they are performing better than at STN?

As you say... Munich, Naples, Split, Dubrovnik and Bodrum still operate from Stansted - in some cases at a higher frequency than they do from Luton. That says all you need to know really.

There is room for both airports in some cases. Of course LTN is the focus for EZY's growth and that's why you're seeing those routes introduced from LTN as well. As they do so, that is bound to have some impact on the size of their STN network.

In the case of CPH, that moved over to LTN completely and look how that one's turned out!!
FRatSTN is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2016, 14:43
  #4874 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: -
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You guys seem to have a short memory...

I don't understand why people think easyjet will shrink or close their Stansted operations. and will be of benefit to LTN, with Jet2 moving in up the road...

When Vueling came to Luton, easyjet have done exactly the opposite and increased frequencies to Amsterdam and Barcelona. Also this is what happened when Ryanair and eaasyJet competed on the Copenhagen route.

Whats to say easyJet won't do the same at Stansted with Jet2 on overlapping routes?!
gilesdavies is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2016, 14:47
  #4875 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 35,000ft
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think a lot of the above comments re EZY moving out of STN are just pure speculation based on a few fan club members wish lists.
pamann is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2016, 14:52
  #4876 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is the artist impression of the new landside terminal extension. OK it looks like a shopping centre but that's fine with me.

The impression is from just inside the main entrance for departing passengers looking across into the site of the former bus station. The security screening area is off to the right while arrivals can be seen through Starbucks on the extreme left.

Got to say I think it actually looks very good

LTNman is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2016, 14:55
  #4877 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pamann
I think a lot of the above comments re EZY moving out of STN are just pure speculation based on a few fan club members wish lists.
Lets just see what happens with easyJet's Stansted base in the future and call it a day. As I've said before I'm not a 'fanboy' just because I'm suggesting things that aren't in favour of Stansted. It is a case of speculation but isn't that what your doing suggesting that the easyJet base will stay? No one knows that's why it's speculation, we all have to just wait and see what happens only time will tell.
AvGeek1 is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2016, 14:57
  #4878 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LTNman
This is the artist impression of the new landside terminal extension. OK it looks like a shopping centre but that's fine with me.

The impression is from just inside the main entrance for departing passengers looking across into the site of the former bus station. The security screening area is off to the right while arrivals can be seen through Starbucks on the extreme left.

Got to say I think it actually looks very good

Maybe they are saving all that money for the interior LTNMan! It does look quite pleasant indeed, but we will have to see because as we know the final product doesn't necessarily look at all like the artist impression!
AvGeek1 is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2016, 16:01
  #4879 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: London
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pamann
I think a lot of the above comments re EZY moving out of STN are just pure speculation based on a few fan club members wish lists.
Much of what appears on these threads is speculation and there's nothing wrong with that. There should be room for debate and discussion in an open, friendly and polite way.

Actually, I think the Jet2 decision is a great one for Stansted and good luck to them.
wallp is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2016, 20:04
  #4880 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: EGGW
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
runway08

That will be a yes.
Mr @ Spotty M is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.