Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

BIRMINGHAM - 6

Old 18th Sep 2016, 17:32
  #4181 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I were monarch I absolutely wouldn't pay out either. As horrendous as it may have been airlines can't afford to dish out cash willy nilly and at the end of the day a computer failure in the terminal is not outlined in European legislation as payable. It could not at the end of the day be foreseen.....
Cloud1 is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2016, 18:27
  #4182 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: On the road
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Neither could a volcanic eruption but that ended up at the door of the airlines.....
TartinTon is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2016, 18:44
  #4183 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: southern spain
Posts: 1,986
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quite agree about the comments about KAB111, sounds like he is one of those people who expects everything to work perfectly all the time and nothing will ever go wrong, well son life is not like that, things go wrong, get a life, nobody got hurt and the passengers got to/from their destinations in one piece admittedly a little late.
compton3bravo is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2016, 20:28
  #4184 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Solihull
Age: 60
Posts: 3,324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flybe

exchanged_gorilla

Yes of course, the timings are only around an hour to an hour and a half later than the first East Mids flights and I doubt that there would be a knock effect to the aircraft as they were due to go back to EMA and the 2nd and 3rd rotations are not operating into BHX by the look of it. In fact the 4th EDI/GLA/BHD on Mondays into EMA do operate as it re-opens at 8pm

Sunday also appears to have an extra GLA, EDI & BHD rotation to BHX, which again also ties in with the EMA runway closure.

Wizz I am told is only a partial release and Bucharest might not be dropped just not finalised.

Pete
OltonPete is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2016, 10:00
  #4185 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: solihull West Midlands
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Coathanger.

Well Delta do JFK from a number of UK airports. Then you have Norwegian saying they are keen to put their MAX8s when they get them on thinner US east coast routes into Western Europe.

Add to that Jet Blue have said last week they may buy the A321NEO(LR) for UK and other European routes.

So there is potential that might work to BHX with planes 15-20% cheaper to run than 757s..time will tell.

In relation to HS2 one of the Govts transport committees said last week, its opening (Brum to London)in 2026 might be an optimistic time scale..so not something to worry about for some time then !

Govt supporting Birmingham expansion..well every little helps, but useless without proper incentives to airlines and APD going..If LHR gets a 3rd runway not even that will help us that much.

.
nigel osborne is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2016, 10:30
  #4186 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Solihull
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nigel

All those airlines do make sense of course, especially with the introduction of MAX8's and A321NEO's. I was just wondering if there was anything more than just guessing (albeit reasoned) as to which airline it might be.

With regards to HS2, it just seems that BHX are planning a large part of their future around HS2 - its been suggested that a new terminal and even a new runway could be built on the HS2 site. My concern is that with how little HS2 will probably benefit BHX, they should by all means include HS2 in their plans, but not centre them so much around it.

Speaking of which, I recall BHX saying they were working on updating their masterplan and that it would be going out to consultation soon. I've asked BHX directly about this on twitter but have yet to receive a response. Anyone got any new on that front?
coathanger16 is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2016, 14:21
  #4187 (permalink)  
Supercalifragilistic
expialidocious
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm hearing a rumor that police boarded a middle eastern airline at Birmingham to remove a passenger wanted in connection with a death. Anyone seen more on that?
Memetic is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2016, 14:27
  #4188 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Age: 51
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think your quite warm there Nigel, except for maybe DL.

JetBlue would certainly look at the regions IMO with 321NEO's.

Maybe NAX will come first though, with MAX's. I am hearing MAN-EWR is a go'er, maybe BHX is in the frame for similar.

With a lower cost base and more cost effective types it should give JBA / NAX a distinct advantage over the aging 757's the US3 tend to deploy to BHX etc.

Here's hoping...
eggc is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2016, 15:21
  #4189 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Solihull
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
eggc

With the introduction of these NEO's and MAX's transatlantic flights from the regions certainly seems a better deal than with the older aircraft AA/UA.

Both AA & UA have orders for NEO's & MAX's so maybe if JetBlue and NAX deploy them it may force the US3 to do the same?

With the aircraft the US3 use of the BHX-NYC routes is it any wonder people travel to MAN & LHR instead.
coathanger16 is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2016, 15:32
  #4190 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chatting to a mate with Norski's - BHX to get base ahead of MAN again - but both going to happen. But what we all know about NAS is that nothing is ever straight forward... So expect a new one in EDI first!
hobnobanyone is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2016, 15:43
  #4191 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: u.k.
Age: 56
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I disagree , If I had the choice of NAX/JBU or one of the legacy carriers it would be the latter every time even if it was on one of the aging 757's.

Yes , the lead in prices may be tempting but with the various add on's are you really getting a bargain? And also the pax going transatlantic is rarely point to point so the Alliance carriers have the advantage of hubbing whereas the others will have to organise a whole host of ticket interlining.

NAX maybe having some success from their current PTP routes but we are talking London and to much popular places like NYC/LAX/FLA , it will be much different from the regions.


I hope UA can hang in there but if not and some carrier like NAX is the only alternative then it's BHX via CDG or AMS westbound for me.
getonittt is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2016, 15:43
  #4192 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: South Wales
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...Or also at one at CWL in the coming years.
AirGuru is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2016, 16:46
  #4193 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: stockport
Posts: 492
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The airline that has really thrown the cat amongst the pigeons at Manchester is Thomas Cook
with their service level superior to most of the US legacy carriers and like wise with reliability

Ian
chaps1954 is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2016, 07:50
  #4194 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vueling

Malaga goes 3x weekly from next March with a Thursday flight added.
jfy1999 is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2016, 06:54
  #4195 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: London
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tubby linton
Another negative post about Monarch 111 KAB, would you really like to see them out of business? You won your Eu 261 claim but have continued in your vendetta against the airline ever since.
What a thoroughly unpleasant individual you are .
I don't see 111KAB stating anything other than fact in this discussion. I don't know what has been said in the past however.
I raised the 11/9 debacle not to pursue compensation (I am not entitled) but to highlight the failure of processes and hopefully the lessons that need to be learned. There is no point in Monarch or any other business looking to expand if they don't have access to appropriate infrastructure to support the proposed services.
Icerefugee is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2016, 11:19
  #4196 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ryanair

New route to Porto, 2x weekly from 26th March 2017
FRatSTN is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2016, 20:54
  #4197 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great news am very happy to see this destination back on the BHX departure boards. It's a lovely city and gateway to some amazing countryside and coast. Good job FR! I wonder if they're getting in before Monarch do?
GayFriendly is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2016, 20:49
  #4198 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Solihull
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone know how the Qatar flights are doing? They've been going for 6 months now - is it performing well?
coathanger16 is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2016, 13:03
  #4199 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Birmingham
Age: 63
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by coathanger16
Anyone know how the Qatar flights are doing? They've been going for 6 months now - is it performing well?
Yes Qatar doing well loads are constantly over 200
With 225 inbound this morning
788 has been the ideal aircraft to launch the route I can see s frequency increase in the near future
Emirates loads also holding up
BHX5DME is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2016, 16:16
  #4200 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Solihull
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BHX5DME - thanks for the update. Are you someone that's "in the know" on these things or is there anyway the average person can find out.

Would be good to see an increase in frequency - likely to be another 788, or a different aircraft?
coathanger16 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.