Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

The official end of the Boeing 747, say the airlines.

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

The official end of the Boeing 747, say the airlines.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Jul 2012, 18:10
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North, UK
Age: 67
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
-1 give me the A380 over the horrible 777 anytime
pwalhx is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2012, 18:24
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Southampton, U.K
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who needs calm when you've got character!! I'll stick to 747's where possible
adfly is online now  
Old 12th Jul 2012, 13:14
  #43 (permalink)  
Bear Behind
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Yerp
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
777 air conditioning noise is horrendous; the big engined variants (GE90-115B) vibrate in the cabin. As one who also is lucky enough to fly a lot in J-Class, the A380s peaceful interior and it's feeling of solidness in take-off, landing and turbulence (due to the active load alleviation?) wins it for me every step of the way.

And by the way - Lufthansa claims that the A380 has 6% lower fuel burn per seat than their 747-8i (published figure in Lufthansa Magazin). I humbly suggest that they are the only ones who today know this for certain, so I tend to believe them.

Last edited by panda-k-bear; 12th Jul 2012 at 13:16.
panda-k-bear is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2012, 13:37
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Southampton, U.K
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But you must also remember that the 748 has the same number of F and J seats as the A380 and as a result they take up a noticeably larger percentage of the overall seats which makes the fuel burn per seat seem worse than it would be if it had the same percentage of premium seats as the A380.
adfly is online now  
Old 19th Jul 2012, 14:49
  #45 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,143
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Some airlines might be saying that the 747 is history but that is probably PR for saying that they are buying new machines and want to make out that old = bad.

On the other hand, some carriers are trumpting the refurbishment of their 747s. VS have just emailed me with links to the refurbishment of 744 'Barbarella' (and what appears to be a D-check) and her return to service with the latest seating and in flight entertainment systems. (Rather than advertise for them, you can search for B's refit on a Tube that is near You.)

Long live the 747!
PAXboy is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2012, 15:01
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: west of the tamar
Age: 75
Posts: 860
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I shall be flying long haul with BA in a couple of weeks because it is the 747 - Club World. Could have flown VS or AC but will fly 747 every time if poss.

Recently flew VS because BA used the 777 on the route, sorry just do not like the 777, much rather fly A380 so another -1!
GROUNDHOG is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2012, 02:05
  #47 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,143
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Agreed GROUNDHOG. I travel much less than I used to but still favour the 747 over anything else. Time may prove other a/c the way it has proved this one.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2012, 05:14
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ank
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was quite looking forward to my A380 SQ Flights, so disappointed!, noisy, poor build quality old rattly unpleasant plane.

SQ 773 and A330 are so much better!!
Throat is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2012, 06:55
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,648
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
What is the actual cause of the continuous thunderous roar inside the 777, compared to the A330, or indeed even the 747 ? The racket is even more noticeable in the rear cabins. Is it the aircon, the way the engines are mounted, or what ? It is most noticeable, of course, if you take a flight on a carrier, eg Cathay, where you connect from one type to the other, so the difference is immediately apparent. It's a constant thing - Airbus used to refer to it some years ago in their advertising.
WHBM is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2013, 00:53
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd rather fly in a plane which is serviced by maintenance engineers who have some idea of what's going on inside the black boxes.

A380: Smoke and mirrors with aluminium wiring, ethernet and firewalls connecting them... oh, and on the ground, four external power leads to power them ...

Hold on a minute, sorry, 3 hours, the computers are rebooting....

A good aircraft is one which has had all the bugs ironed out.
NSEU is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2013, 07:41
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,992
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
A good aircraft is one which has had all the bugs ironed out.
Like Boeing's latest masterpiece - the Nightmareliner.
Groundloop is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2013, 11:06
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 14 days away 14 at home
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
End of an era coming up?

Boeing warns about unclaimed 747-8 production slots
No RYR for me is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2013, 16:11
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
might be a sudden rush if the 787 problems continue - you won't be able to get a 777 or a 330 for love nor money
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2013, 16:24
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 964
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Heathrow Harry, no way. The B748 and B787 series are aimed at totally different markets, routes and customers. B747-8 is aimed at the 450 seat long haul market up against the Airbus 380. B787 is aimed at the 300 seat long/medium hall market up against the Airbus A330.

The most likely winner of the Dreamliner fiasco is the Airbus A350.
Dannyboy39 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.