Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Monarch - 3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Oct 2016, 10:25
  #3661 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: BHX
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well if the rumours of lots of Chinese money are true then things could be looking up without doubt
Brigantee is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2016, 10:28
  #3662 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: The Deep South (Sussex)
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having lost the odd pilot job in the UK IT business (Laker, Air Europe etc) I am now retired and have flown with Monarch several times in recent years.

I now fly with them by choice .They have an excellent product with a great set of cabin staff and I am keeping my fingers crossed for them.

Looking forward to travelling with them to Lanzagrotty next year.
Lou Scannon is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2016, 10:33
  #3663 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re Government intervention. I too see no place for the government to intervene in the plight of Monarch. The reality of it is Monarch are of no strategic importance (agreed they do support a lot of high quality/skilled jobs) to the country. Should Monarch, or any airline operating in the leisure sector for that matter, cease trading the market has so many other players in it that the capacity would easily be absorbed. In fact an over supply of seats on most of Monarchs routes is looming. If I was a competitor I wouldn't be happy if they were to receive preferential treatment. Also where was the intervention with XL, Globespan, Baby
That said, delighted that Monarch live to fight another day. A great brand and a decent employer.
Perhaps the HNA deal will be tied in to the purchase of the 737s (in an asset management role), so they will not require a majority stake.
Fletch is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2016, 10:37
  #3664 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: BHX
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im sure the government have no intention whatsoever of getting involved in this issue
Brigantee is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2016, 10:42
  #3665 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Age: 43
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unless we are party to the negotiations, none of us here really know what's going on behind closed doors. There is little certainty in anything we say, it is merely conjecture and opinion, sometimes enlightened opinion!
KyleRB is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2016, 11:08
  #3666 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: gate 67 JFK
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think some people are trying to see things in this that don't exist, the UK Government won't get involved, they will be aware of course because potentially large scale redundancies require that they be aware, but beyond that no chance of interference in a private company.

The CAA have granted an extension because they are satisfied that the risk in two weeks is no greater than now and i would expect some form of bond will have been paid to allow this whilst work continues to find an investor.

Well I'm sure that having news about the 12 day extension on SKY news will do far more damage to future booking than all the tittle tattle on here, Facebook and Twitter.

Last edited by INKJET; 1st Oct 2016 at 12:18. Reason: SKY news item
INKJET is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2016, 11:33
  #3667 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: BHX
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
By all accounts a investor is on board and announcement due early next week
Brigantee is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2016, 11:52
  #3668 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suspect this is still more complex than many on here realise. Don't forget that Greybull only own 90% of Monarch.
Rushed Approach is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2016, 12:30
  #3669 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Age: 43
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what I do know I think you might be right Rushed Approach.
KyleRB is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2016, 12:46
  #3670 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: BHX
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They need to get things sorted ASAP regarding the ATOL renewal , As it stands they have been thrown a lifeline , If they let it go to wire as they did yesterday again consumer confidence already damaged will be lost completely
Brigantee is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2016, 12:49
  #3671 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Age: 43
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Brigantee

I think they are aware of this! I can't imagine they are deliberately dragging this out.

I have 2 good friends there so I have an interest plus if they do longhaul again, I would re-submit my application!
KyleRB is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2016, 15:12
  #3672 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: earth
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Uplinker
False rumours and malicious speculation. Monarch are good to go.

Watch this space.
Unfortunately for those at Monarch I think you might be mistaken, if there was "nothing to see here move along" then my personal belief is a new ATOL would have been issued, not a 12 day extension, which in reality is just a temporary lifeline. I guess the conversation went something along the lines of" we're in a good state", "we don't think you are", "we are", "prove it", "erm we cant right now, here's what we can prove", "ok that's enough to buy you 12 days, you have that time to come up with the rest".


For the jobs of all those involved I hope that all is good going forward, but to go to the 11th hour just for 12 days seems somewhat bizarre. I certainly hope it's not so the CAA can in 12 days turn around and say, we gave them a chance, so it's not our fault gov"


Good luck all involved.
xollob is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2016, 15:15
  #3673 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
probably The Money playing hard to get an trying to extort the best possible price

Monarch aren't out of the woods yet but they're sounding very bullish..............
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2016, 16:18
  #3674 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 594
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lou Scannon...all at Monarch salute you...

I think it's fair to say the Naysayers are going to end up with egg on their face.
RHINO is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2016, 16:27
  #3675 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 594
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I doubt the 10% stake the PPF has is relevant in any way.

This will not go down to the wire but be sorted shortly.

Why shouldn't the UK government get involved.

Thomas Cook was 'sorted' by the UK government
RHINO is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2016, 16:31
  #3676 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thomas Cook was nationalised???? Missed that one!
Why would a Chinese business be keen to lose money against FR/EZY/DY/LS taking white people to get a tan?
How are forward bookings looking? Unless new owner has VERY deep pockets they're about to have an existence threatening winter trading situation. Seriously, rose tinted memories of better days aside, who on Earth books with a company with this visibility in the news cycle? The only way back is to beat the other guys on PRICE and that won't get you through to the summer!
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2016, 16:34
  #3677 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 594
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Who said anything about 'Nationalised'
RHINO is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2016, 16:38
  #3678 (permalink)  
gtf
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Here today, elsewhere tomorrow
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pax britanica
So tell the Eu to get lost re Monarch but where does that leave Easyjet and Ryan both much much bigger who are very EU dependent?

And of course the Eu can always turn round and add conditions to 'foreign ' airlines operating largely inside the Eu so a quick fix on Monarch may not be so simple
Eu doesn't need to "add" conditions. EU airline exceeding 49% have no traffic rights to EU airports.
gtf is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2016, 17:02
  #3679 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: BHX
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dont know why a chinese company would be interested skipness but it appears they certainly were three months back so maybe still are ?

http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/articl...-monarch-stake

They recently bought a 80 per cent stake in SR Technics so perhaps monarchs engineering business which is by all accounts highly regarded is part of the attraction ?
Brigantee is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2016, 17:14
  #3680 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Please do not always believe what a Chinese person says in business and aviation.

Had first hand experience of their lies recently.
Pin Head is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.