Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Monarch - 3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Jul 2014, 20:44
  #2121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 39
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Come on people haven't got a clue about what planes they are flying on. It was only a few years ago Balkan would fly people on TU154s. If people knew anything about them and their chequered history I'm sure nobody would set foot in them. In days gone by when airlines used to sell themselves on the planes they flew they people maybe were a little more type aware (connie, trident, BAC111, l1011, DC10, Electras) but now when airlines are pretty common (especially down the back) and the planes are pretty generic looking people don't know or don't care.

Maybe people know a 787 is a bit different, but line one up against a group of other aircraft and I'd bet you not one of your average punters could distinguish it from the rest.

I don't think for one moment that MON will buy Boeing. EZY were in advanced talks with Boeing too very recently. They didn't go Boeing. Instead they played the manufacturers off of one another to get a better deal out of airbus. Same here.
fa2fi is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2014, 08:55
  #2122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
O`Leary used to get quotes from both Boeing and Airbus and fax them to each other to nail down the best price
paully is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2014, 09:54
  #2123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Polymer Records
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Monarch has discretely released its financial report.
I can see why the results were released discretely, they made for quite interesting reading. After loosing in excess of £50M for 2 years in a row, they have "only" lost £14M in 2013. Despite having been bailed out by over £100M in recent years, they are now down to £17M in net assets.

How exactly are they funding this order of new aircraft? Another present from Switzerland?
Artie Fufkin is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2014, 06:43
  #2124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Southbank
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was also wondering how they will fund the purchase of the new aircraft. Heard they are already having cashflow problems!!
crosswind11 is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2014, 16:29
  #2125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: uk
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Saxonbloke...............here here.................spot on




It was a strange 1st post....wasn't it!!!
New T2 Office is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2014, 11:06
  #2126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Yorks
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fleet Announcement

2014 News - Flights - THE MONARCH GROUP CONFIRMS BOEING AS THE PREFERRED BIDDER FOR NARROW-BODIED FLEET REPLACEMENT | Flights News - Monarch
greatoaks is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2014, 13:52
  #2127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hove
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Monarch has also announced the same day that it is about to leave Swissport at LGW and MAN due to the terrible performance of the handling agent this summer.
A new handling agent will take over early November.
on time all the time is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2014, 19:02
  #2128 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And all the folk laid off from Swissport will just transition across to the new handling agent. Seen it all before!
Blighty Pilot is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2014, 19:28
  #2129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: England
Posts: 1,077
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
And then the pain will be repeated, not due to the Swissport staff, but that's just the way it goes.
ZeBedie is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2014, 22:16
  #2130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: U.K
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Monarch has also announced the same day that it is about to leave Swissport at LGW and MAN due to the terrible performance of the handling agent this summer.
A new handling agent will take over early November.
Translation:- Another handling agent is prepared to do the job for less money !
Don't kid yourself, it's all about doing it for the lowest price - service is a very distant 2nd.
The96er is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2014, 00:11
  #2131 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not so many places currently
Age: 60
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fleet Announcement
How much of this order is about keeping the GoldCare for the Engineering arm?
pabely is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2014, 04:34
  #2132 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: EGGW
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
pabely

Not one little bit.
Its all down to operating costs.
Mr @ Spotty M is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2014, 08:19
  #2133 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: manchester
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who will be Monarch's new handling agent at man.
SCANDIC is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2014, 14:38
  #2134 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have already commented on the superior payload range of the Boeing offering vs. Airbus especially on the longer routes. Not surprised at all.

At the expense of a tiny bit of cabin width which customer service can easily overcome. The 737 MAX gets pretty close to the 757.

As an aside doesn't the aeroplane look great in Monarch colours- slightly more purposeful the 'BUS

Am amazed that airframe I fist saw as a 13 year old boy in 1968 will now see me out- hats to the boys at Being for squeezing the most out of an airframe
22/04 is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2014, 16:10
  #2135 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Newcastle NI
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
22/04

I Don't dispute your claim, but i was surprised Monarch made the jump to Boeing given their current fleet of Airbus aircraft, i can only think that Boeing was holding non refundable deposit money from the now cancelled 787 order and that when that went back into the pot the numbers added up.

If this is to be Monarch 'standard' aircraft going forward then 189 pax is a lot less than what the A321 can carry, although i did read that Boeing was looking at a 200 seat version of the 800 airframe without a stretch but an extra door aft of the wing.

What about long haul is there a further order to come? ditto talk of the C series?

A fleet of 320/321 Neo's plus 330 Neo's would have given greater route flexibility with a common type rating and the entry in to service date could have been earlier, Q2 2018 is a long time off.
Facelookbovvered is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2014, 16:38
  #2136 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 1,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I Don't dispute your claim, but i was surprised Monarch made the jump to Boeing given their current fleet of Airbus aircraft, i can only think that Boeing was holding non refundable deposit money from the now cancelled 787 order and that when that went back into the pot the numbers added up.
I think you have hit the nail smack bang on the head.
TSR2 is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2014, 19:01
  #2137 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Under the flight path
Posts: 2,625
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
According to Boeing, the Max 8's high-density seating capacity is 200. If Monarch also ordered Max 9s, that increases to 220.
LGS6753 is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2014, 07:51
  #2138 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 3,065
Received 256 Likes on 142 Posts
Facelookbovvered

I Don't dispute your claim, but i was surprised Monarch made the jump to Boeing given their current fleet of Airbus aircraft, i can only think that Boeing was holding non refundable deposit money from the now cancelled 787 order and that when that went back into the pot the numbers added up.
If you're going to spend USD3.1bn then surely the decision is going to come down to two things. First cost, and not just the up front price, but the operating costs. Second (but obviously not by much) the competing product's ability to perform the job required of them.

How it looks in your (the airlines) colour scheme is of no importance whatsoever - appreciate you haven't mentioned this flb.

As for your average bucket and spade passenger, these days they'd be hard pressed to know whether they were inside an Airbus or Boeing product. All they're interested in is price, price and then price of their ticket.
ATNotts is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2014, 12:37
  #2139 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone know the outcome of the Monarch diversion to Athens yesterday (around 1645 UTC)?They mentioned they had a problem dealing with a disruptive passenger who was turning violent.
Superpilot is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2014, 14:50
  #2140 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Comment circulating on the internet "Return flight Birmingham-Larnaca on 16/17/14.We had an emergency landing at Athens airport because a passenger was drunk.The crew made mistakes.First they underestimated the situation and then they overreacted when the situation was under control.We have pictures of him drinking beers on the plane whilst being drunk."


Don't know why they bothered to land ..... should have just opened the door and pushed.
111KAB is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.