Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

BIRMINGHAM - 5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Nov 2012, 23:06
  #1841 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: birmingham
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Northerncounties.

If you have an iphone (not sure if it is on android) download vouchercloud it has lots of offers on there for parking.

Hope this helps.
justplanecrazy84 is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2012, 06:31
  #1842 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 3,067
Received 275 Likes on 152 Posts
Planeaddict

Look back through this thread and see the passenger numbers and load factors posted by OltonPete on a monthly basis for your answer.

Of course Emirates could offer a third daily services, but what's in it for them? On the face of it, nothing other than dilution of the passengers they are currently carrying across 3 flights instead of 2.

Even Emirates are in it for profit!
ATNotts is online now  
Old 1st Dec 2012, 08:16
  #1843 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Stourbridge
Age: 46
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RE: PK

Here's a thought for the group:

Lately it seems that everytime we see PK on the news or making comments to the media, he always says about flights to the west coast of USA & China etc.

Could it be that maybe he knows something we dont?
Could it be that he has agreements in place with various operators, but for various reasons he cant announce it officially?

My opinion is that we are too close to Manchester & the London airports for any operator to operate the routes profitably. As somebody commented earlier about concreating most of Solihull, I doubt we will get the routes PK wants. Hopefully I am proven wrong!

Best Wishes

Adam
AdamG1 is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2012, 09:44
  #1844 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: solihull West Midlands
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Adam G1.

Re PK.

I don't think he has any agreements yet with airlines ,however they are constantly talking to airlines, and a number of the larger ones have expressed an interest in BHX.

If you don't have the runway length at BHX then you definately won't attract the long haul carriers talked of.

I know there are a number of doomers and gloomers who seem desperate for BHX runway extension to fail. Perhaps it won't deliver, but at least we have a chance now.

Nigel
nigel osborne is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2012, 11:03
  #1845 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: South of MAN, North of BHX, and well clear of Stoke ;-)
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know there are a number of doomers and gloomers who seem desperate for BHX runway extension to fail.
I don't think anyone is desperate for it to fail; afterall, whether one is crew, groundstaff, ATC, coach driver or spotter, almost everyone on PPRuNe has a vested interest in the success of aviation.

Where people sometimes get tarred with the doom and gloom brush is when they question the necessity of the project or ask how the cost is justified.

It could very easily be argued that, even with the current runway, BHX is failing to attract airlines on to routes which could be easily served by the existing runway length.

A very valid and up to date example would be Toronto and Canada generally. An A310 can operate to YYZ out of BHX with no payload restrictions. An A332 could operate to most of Canada out of BHX with no payload restrictions.

Yet Birmingham has just one weekly, seasonal Air Transat A310 to YYZ.

It cannot be blamed on the economic climate when Transat have just this week increased their MAN-YYZ schedule next summer from already a daily service to 8 flights per week with a combination of A310 and A332. Equally, Gatwick is served next summer 10 x weekly to YYZ alone.

You think a few extra metres of concrete is going to have Transat knocking on PK's door to go daily from summer '14? Of course not.

I'll say it again; you can concrete the whole of Solihull, but if airlines can cover the catchment area successfully with operations to the north and south of BHX, without the additional costs associated with another base at BHX, it's going to be a very uphill struggle to justify the extension, not least also with TK and EK becoming well established at BHX for all points east.

My tuppence worth
StoneyBridge Radar is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2012, 11:38
  #1846 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: birmingham
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm guessing it's all down to the passengers i know for sure say JUST FOR EXAMPLE if ANA started a flight to Japan say £700 rtn and TK done the same for £600 via Istanbul i would pay the extra £100 for the direct flight and same goes with Heathrow if they did the same flight £200 cheaper i would rather pay more to fly from BHX then travel all the way down to London by car or train and have all the hassel of getting to Heathrow from Euston or paying parking and dealing with all the queues at security.

And before anyone says "thats your opinion" yes i know but i'm sure i'm not the only who would do that.

(All prices and airlines were examples and not to be taken to heart lol)
justplanecrazy84 is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2012, 12:00
  #1847 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Manchester
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
don't see why EK couldn't start a third daily service with an A330, or even an A340 (seeing as Glasgow could manage it and it took them at least 7 years to get a second daily flight),
GLA is only 2 daily. However, a bigger concern may be that they introduced first class at the same time. Quite why BHX has not managed that is something that I'm slightly surprised with.

If this turns out to materialise, I can only presume it is because QR have seen EK's falling loads whilst TK has gone through the roof; is there room for the three of them at BHX which, in itself, continues to be squeezed by MAN and LHR, not forgetting that LHR will be QR's flagship 787 route for the forseeable...
Yet MAN has every day 3 x EK, 2 x TK and EY, with up to 2 x QR though there appears to be no real dilution of passenger numbers when frequencies are bumped which tends to suggest they are living with each other here. The broad catchment area for BHX is surely just as big as that for MAN but somehow they need to try to arrest the flow routing via LHR - I imagine that to be a far greater migration than towards MAN. What kind of marketing campaign does BHX have around the London area?
Ringwayman is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2012, 15:49
  #1848 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: uk
Age: 34
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What would happen if EK just went ahead and started a third daily flight based on the passenger numbers? Or maybe they'll go ahead with it once the Qatar service is confirmed?

Whenever I see these diversions over fog, snow etc, I always seem to imagine that the 80s stands are turned into a pier, and an airbridge connecting it to the terminal. If you see what I'm getting at, maybe make the concept 'come to life' (Google Sketchup would be a good one, someone who has much more knowledge of the airport and is a better sketcher than me )

I still think Shaheen Air or Airblue are a possiblity. I have contacted both via Facebook and the response from both was quite simple, "We'll keep you updated for any official announcements". I presume that both airlines are talking to BHX, but what they could provide is a non-stop service to Karachi or Lahore which we haven't had in, what, 10 years (when PIA used to use BHX for their transatlantic flights)? If a 772 can make it from Delhi, then an A332 should be a decent option (even without the need of a runway extension). If anyone hears anything let us know

Another thing I'd like to point out is the need for an indoor viewing area. I think many would definitely push for a replacement for the Aviation Experience (which was sadly closed just under 2 years ago), anyone heard anything?
Planeaddict is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2012, 17:21
  #1849 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Solihull
Age: 60
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EK/QR/Pakistan

Planeaddict

ATNotts explained it earlier based on regular load factors of 76-85% they would just spread the passengers out over three flights. The third flight would leave about 9-10am to connect with EK's third biggest departure bank at Dubai. This is mainly routes to Indian and Pakistan so there is a chance that they might pinch some of PIA pax and give that service a problem.

Also if priced right they might re-take some passengers from Turkish but that is hardly an ideal situation. If EK opened up Dubai - Amritsar then that would give the third service a boost but that is affected by UAE-Indo bilaterals I believe before you even consider whether an Amritsar service would be sustainable from Dubai. It is one of the few routes that is not rumoured much although I am sure eventually they will get round to looking at it.

As for Lahore, if my memory serves me right I don't think passenger figures anywhere other than Islamabad from BHX have set the world alight in the past.

Ringwayman - Did they have much choice with Glasgow? The one flight was packed out but doubling capacity would have been a risk so they put one their smallest aircraft in terms of seats on the second flight, although this is to be increased soon as they slowly withdraw the 343 from the fleet. Glasgow's load factors with the A343 have only been in the mid 70's so a 428 seat aircraft I would have thought would have been a disaster. Saying that I believe you can purchase first class on the Glasgow service, which was not an option on BHX when the three class 77W's operated on the evening service.

Are you sure about the dilution statement - I know in October the net figures from all those services were up (QR were the only ones down) but the load factors of the ME carriers were only mid to late 70's, surely yields have been diluted with all the empty seats or have they managed to maintain average fares?

Transat - major disappointment


AdamG1

West Coast of America - short-term no chance, medium-term - no chance, long-term - little chance. The only reason I say little is the EK factor, in order words things change and 15 years ago suggesting twice daily EK would have got you a visit from the men in white coats

Pete
OltonPete is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2012, 17:47
  #1850 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Birmingham, UK
Age: 66
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flew out this morning and the Transaero 743 and the EK 77W were still parked on the remotes.
BobBHX is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2012, 19:10
  #1851 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: solihull West Midlands
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stoneybridge radar,

Not sure BHX are building the extension to fly an extra holiday Air Transit flt to Toronto !

Nigel
nigel osborne is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2012, 19:28
  #1852 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tracey Island
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re PK.....I doubt he has anything lined up for over a year into the future. It'll just be more bull to add to his ever growing catalog....
call100 is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2012, 20:01
  #1853 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: South of MAN, North of BHX, and well clear of Stoke ;-)
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nigel osbourne, as usual, you miss the point.

Suggest you re-read.
StoneyBridge Radar is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2012, 21:25
  #1854 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The runway extension is not needed.
I suspect like a lot of businesses, it won't do any harm to add it AND it ticks the box of BEING SEEN to be DOING SOMETHING/ANYTHING in a difficult trading environment. The business case is tenuous, the number of likely flights who would ever need it seems remote.
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2012, 22:47
  #1855 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Diagree, the more runway you have the better off you are! Flexibility is the key. It should have been done 10 years ago.
Stopend is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2012, 00:01
  #1856 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
D0iagree, the more runway you have the better off you are! Flexibility is the key. It should have been done 10 years ago.
Name three likely routes and aircraft types that would actually *need* it and are currently mot serving the market having so much as mentioned runway length.

Let me start : Not QATAR, not Etihad.
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2012, 00:08
  #1857 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Middlesex (under the flightpath)
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote: I still think Shaheen Air or Airblue are a possiblity. I have contacted both via Facebook and the response from both was quite simple, "We'll keep you updated for any official announcements". I presume that both airlines are talking to BHX, but what they could provide is a non-stop service to Karachi or Lahore which we haven't had in, what, 10 years (when PIA used to use BHX for their transatlantic flights)? If a 772 can make it from Delhi, then an A332 should be a decent option (even without the need of a runway extension). If anyone hears anything let us know

Expect that these routes would be mostly VFR business looking for low fares, not many first and business class pax. Maybe in the present conditions these routes are not sustainable, especially as EKand TK could have much of this business sown up.
Fairdealfrank is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2012, 09:20
  #1858 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: uk
Age: 34
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Name three likely routes and aircraft types that would actually *need* it and are currently mot serving the market having so much as mentioned runway length.

Let me start : Not QATAR, not Etihad.
Air China, direct route from Beijing. American Airlines, direct from San Francisco.

That's all I could come up with.
Planeaddict is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2012, 09:52
  #1859 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: uk
Age: 34
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I definitely think they would need to expand the terminal a bit. A new pier would come into use when the runway extension is done so I'd reckon they start on it soon.

Since 'Airtrans Limited' ceased traiding over the Aviation Experience, is there any other company which could do so?
Planeaddict is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2012, 10:18
  #1860 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stafford
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Air China, direct route from Beijing. American Airlines, direct from San Francisco.
But AA don't offer any international service from SFO so why would they fly to BHX?
chinapattern is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.