Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

United Continental...merger

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

United Continental...merger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Apr 2010, 04:08
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: alameda
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
United Continental...merger

Recent articles are putting forth he merger again...Houston is even worried about losing CAL's HQ.

Now, I understand ALPA changed their merger policy to reflect Date of hire. U see...the UAL boys want it both ways.

thoughts?
protectthehornet is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2010, 14:58
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 349
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
PTH, In recent memory when did United managment EVER consider the pilots, or any other staff?. IMHO they have shafted them whenever possible.
fleigle is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2010, 18:11
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I understand ALPA changed their merger policy to reflect Date of hire
Is that a bad thing?

I am asuming you mean the seniority list would now merge on date of joining and, for instance, a captain who achieved an early command compared with one of the merging companies could end up back in the RHS?
Basil is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2010, 18:32
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: alameda
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fleigle: yes

basil: no/ yes
protectthehornet is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2010, 19:28
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: alameda
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
studi

you are right of course. the reason this doesn't happen is selfishness.

oh well

atb
protectthehornet is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2010, 19:34
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Merging lists is never easy nor really fair to all. Good examples even in germany are the merger of GWI into the KTV (eye to eye? more be happy you get in even if you do not want it), or the merger between AB and its subsidiaries which are now in the works for more than 3 years and still not solved.
Denti is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2010, 20:03
  #7 (permalink)  
742
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why always these problems with seniority mergers in the USA?
Back in the days of regulation mergers were done with consideration of the "career expectations" for the two employee groups. Northwest and Republic employees, to pick an example, had different "career expectations". In this day and age the idea leads to arguments about who is bringing more to the merger.

This is aggravated by many airlines having had hiring cycles that were out of sync, so even very similar airlines can get very messy when looking at straight date of hire integrations. America West and USAirways for example, where America West had Captains with later dates of hire than furloughed USAirways pilots.

All of which set the stage for greed to come front and center.
742 is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2010, 20:13
  #8 (permalink)  
Trash du Blanc
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: KBHM
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Easy, isn't it?
Astounding how nobody thought of it before....
Huck is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2010, 21:29
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: alameda
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
career expectations?

career expecations is the biggest scam foisted on the public since ''one hour martinizing''.
protectthehornet is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2010, 22:56
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Why always these problems with seniority mergers in the USA?
. . . .
No downgradings, everyone keeps its seat. Seat changes according to the new list.
. . . .
Easy, isn't it?
Not just the USA
. . . .
OK in a fast promotion time. If things are slow then it's 'redress training' based on DoJ (before the anti seniority Gods of the Sky mention it - subject to suitability)
. . . .
It's never easy.

Most people who have flown as captain will be disappointed to go back in the RHS but remember, you have been/are a captain - straight back, wear three bars with pride (unlike a colleague who used to skulk through the terminal in a scruffy fleece ) I've been in worse situations. The interesting bit about going back from captain to FO is that it confirms all the FO stuff about some captains being OK and others being a PITA (but nevertheless competent airmen)

OK, once again this week I'll bite.
WTF is ''one hour martinizing''

Last edited by Basil; 28th Apr 2010 at 23:11.
Basil is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2010, 00:05
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: sfo
Age: 70
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile Basil

"One Hour Martinizing" is an alleged dry cleaning process. Big sign on the outside of the establishment, but try getting your clothes back the next day, let alone an hour later.
sb_sfo is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2010, 01:34
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Most people who have flown as captain will be disappointed to go back in the RHS but remember, you have been/are a captain - straight back, wear three bars with pride (unlike a colleague who used to skulk through the terminal in a scruffy fleece )
I think all of the current US Air East pilots could have bid captain in years past, most did. Seems like US Air and FedEx have some deal where once you've been a captain you still wear four stripes as an FO (or FE at FedEx) but don't wear a captain's hat or wings. Sounds a little confusing to me.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2010, 02:36
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At AC in the 90's we sometimes, actually most times had three four-stripers on the YVR/KIX run. The left seater had the lid with scrambled eggs and the others not. For most it was a case of "Je ne give a **** pas."
OKFINE is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2010, 02:38
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: alameda
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One hour martinizing...this line was borrowed from KRAMER in a Seinfeld TV show episode...watch them all and when this one comes up, you will have a double laugh.

airbubba. ur correct about usair east...funny thing is after 911 and the shutdown of DCA for three weeks, things got hairy and many captains were demoted, other pilots furloughed.

of course America West hadn't yet hired some pilots during that time, yet those they hired LATER made captain.

So, the terrorists won again.

The reason a former captain could keep his four stripes was monetary. The company wouldn't pay for a new coat jacket with three stripes.



PS...the seinfeld episode is called: "The Suicide"...very funny

Last edited by protectthehornet; 29th Apr 2010 at 03:50.
protectthehornet is offline  
Old 2nd May 2010, 23:04
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC USA
Age: 64
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
United/Continental (armchair CEO version)

AP source: Continental and United to combine - Yahoo! News

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100502/ap_on_bi_ge/us_united_continental

C2j
Cubs2jets is offline  
Old 2nd May 2010, 23:13
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This should be exciting. The problem with being number one is that there is only one way to go as everyone wants to dethrone you . The benefit of being number one is enormous. I hope it`s a success.
6000PIC is offline  
Old 3rd May 2010, 01:18
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It appears that Continental has chosen to join the race to the bottom in customer service. To now they have distinguished themselves by remaining "a cut above," but that will soon be lost.

The "legacy" carriers have nothing more to offer today than a look at history...
Intruder is offline  
Old 3rd May 2010, 01:46
  #18 (permalink)  
Trash du Blanc
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: KBHM
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sadly, a leaky ship has taken on a load of bricks.

And dammit I enjoy flying on Continental.
Huck is offline  
Old 3rd May 2010, 10:03
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: EU
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is far from a done deal. But it was very predictable that this attempt was going to be made.

After Continental Airlines left the Skyteam alliance for Star (because of the Delta/NWA merger) there was only one way to go. The next step will be for American Airlines to try and get US Aiways merged into them (although the synergies are tougher in that case). This would leave three large groupings in the US and Europe, all tied together in the worldwide alliances anchored by the respective mega carriers. These three worldwide alliances will control upwards of 70% of all traffic. That will only leave room for a potential fourth grouping which would tie together the low-cost carriers. This is still a few years away, but is inevitable. Only some non-aligned niche carriers will be left fighting for any crumbs.
Otterman is offline  
Old 3rd May 2010, 14:44
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Will the wooly pully file an objection?
Basil is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.