NEWCASTLE - 8
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
June Provisional Stats
Heathrow: 42783 +5%
Stansted 4046
Aberdeen 1994 -26%
Belfast City 2976 +32%
Belfast Int N/A
Bristol N/A
Southampton 9461 +5% (Surprised about this given the schedule changes)
Brussels 2743 +21%
Copenhagen 2066 +8%
Paris CDG 13339 Flat
Dusseldorf 3325 +6%
Dublin 14608 +13%
Rome 2240 -9%
Amsterdam 30757 -2%
Barcelona 6388 -3%
Stavanger 1177 -35%
Geneva 4017
Prague 2391 +3%
Krakow 2487 +1%
Dubai 16460 +12% (average 274 per flight - 64% loads)
Newark 4099 (average 93 pax per flight - 55% loads).
Sanford 2302 +1%
Cancun 2299 +15%
Stansted 4046
Aberdeen 1994 -26%
Belfast City 2976 +32%
Belfast Int N/A
Bristol N/A
Southampton 9461 +5% (Surprised about this given the schedule changes)
Brussels 2743 +21%
Copenhagen 2066 +8%
Paris CDG 13339 Flat
Dusseldorf 3325 +6%
Dublin 14608 +13%
Rome 2240 -9%
Amsterdam 30757 -2%
Barcelona 6388 -3%
Stavanger 1177 -35%
Geneva 4017
Prague 2391 +3%
Krakow 2487 +1%
Dubai 16460 +12% (average 274 per flight - 64% loads)
Newark 4099 (average 93 pax per flight - 55% loads).
Sanford 2302 +1%
Cancun 2299 +15%
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Durham
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
UA 159 to Newark Cancelled this morning
I see although inbound aircraft landed as UA160 this morning at 0708, the return leg was initially showing as delayed, but has since been cancelled. Can anyone advise has this aircraft gone tech after landing at NCL.
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Durham
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
UA159 EWR
The aircraft [N48127] for this cancelled flight this morning is now planned to operate UA71 AMS to EWR tomorrow (although incoming to AMS (UA70) is still planned leaving EWR tonight at 17.55 EDT on N13113. N13113 is not showing rtn leg to EWR but next schedule is EWR to MCO (Orlando) at 12.45 Tomorrow Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) which it would be positioned for after return from AMS.
Is it therefore likely to be a) cancelled off EWR-AMS, b) Return as duplicate with overflow AMS - EWR passengers or c) Return to EWR empty.
source of flights/ aircraft: Flightradar24
Is it therefore likely to be a) cancelled off EWR-AMS, b) Return as duplicate with overflow AMS - EWR passengers or c) Return to EWR empty.
source of flights/ aircraft: Flightradar24
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
United
The aircraft on ground in NCL (tech) will operate tomorrow's scheduled 09.10 to EWR
Tomorrow mornings arrival aircraft will operate today's EWR flight at 10.00 but has been delayed until 18.00 for crewing reasons.
Tomorrow mornings arrival aircraft will operate today's EWR flight at 10.00 but has been delayed until 18.00 for crewing reasons.
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Durham
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is FR24 incorrect then (Check aircraft reg. and then flight plan for next couple of days) N48127 (this morning's a/c which has gone tech) has only recently been switched to show departure out of AMS tomorrow as UA71.
Just enter N48127 in search box on FR24 and info will appear. As with other searhes.
What is your source that indicates it leaving NCL and tomorrows Inbound delayed?
Just enter N48127 in search box on FR24 and info will appear. As with other searhes.
What is your source that indicates it leaving NCL and tomorrows Inbound delayed?
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
United website contains all the correct details, as for checking FR24 they most likely relay all information form United website which probably took ops time to confirm exact details.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: newcastle
Age: 44
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What Jamie said is correct. N48127 went tech in NCL this morning. It is now serviceable and will operate the UA159 in the morning. The A/C that arrives on UA160 (which is operating on time as far as I'm aware) will hang around until 1800 when it will depart as UA2099 with the crew and the remainder of the passengers from today's UA159.
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Durham
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
UA 2099 Update
N48127 went tech in NCL this morning. It is now serviceable and will operate the UA159 in the morning. The A/C that arrives on UA160 (which is operating on time as far as I'm aware) will hang around until 1800 when it will depart as UA2099 with the crew and the remainder of the passengers from today's UA159.
Are United's 757 fleet very unreliable?
Edit: At 19:11 N29124 is approaching Shannon with Flight No. UA26 showing (Normally, this is the flight no. for BHX-EWR)
Edit 2 : Showing as departure on Shannon's Departure board as UA2099 to EWR departure time 20:00 - Dparted at 20:20
Last edited by VentureGo; 19th Jul 2015 at 19:24.
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The middle east market is sewn up by Emirates , no way would Qatar come here now.
Mind you , The full page about the city of Newcastle and their picture header of the bridges across the Tyne on the Qatar website is a good touch
Mind you , The full page about the city of Newcastle and their picture header of the bridges across the Tyne on the Qatar website is a good touch
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The United fleet of 757's are the old Continental a/c and are getting a bit long in the tooth and seem to have become very unreliable recently. It is time they were replaced with newer metal.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Careful what you wish for, if they stay with more B788s then regional UK flying will be downsized, the B737MAX is also not ideal. The reason there's been an upsurge in B757s to the US is they're fully depreciated assets working hard at the end of their lives. Not sure BFS/NCL would see much ROI on a new capital intensive fleet of shiny Boeings.
Given Qatar and Etihad are killing each other over scraps in EDI while Emirates remains with the spoils at GLA, I think this might be er.....wrong.
Given Qatar and Etihad are killing each other over scraps in EDI while Emirates remains with the spoils at GLA, I think this might be er.....wrong.
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Manchester
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There have always been rumours of another Eastern carrier to NCL, given my opinion though, I think a bit more Eastern wouldn't hurt the Northern market - By that I mean Air India and no I'm not joking.
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: UK
Age: 53
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Air India? This is just getting daft. The only East bound I could see in the future might be TK. Look at other long hauls ex NCL thus far, UA not off to a great start and EK the lowest carrying UK route to DXB with patchy load factors year round. AI are basket cases but surely theyre not that loopey.
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Hartlepool
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Agree completely with what VickersVicount says. Thought the dreamers/'unrealists' had gone but it seems not.
AI aren't even at MAN and from what I hear, aren't doing amazing at BHX so why they would even consider NCL is beyond me
Think people need to face up to the fact that NCL is no MAN/BHX/GLA. We're a decent size airport with a relatively good range of carriers offering lots of connections but I can't ever see the need for QR, EY, AI etc. TK maybe but anything else would just be overkill.
And going West, well hopefully UA will keep EWR next summer but in today's market, airlines don't have the money/aircraft/time to just give routes another chance.
AI aren't even at MAN and from what I hear, aren't doing amazing at BHX so why they would even consider NCL is beyond me
Think people need to face up to the fact that NCL is no MAN/BHX/GLA. We're a decent size airport with a relatively good range of carriers offering lots of connections but I can't ever see the need for QR, EY, AI etc. TK maybe but anything else would just be overkill.
And going West, well hopefully UA will keep EWR next summer but in today's market, airlines don't have the money/aircraft/time to just give routes another chance.