FlyBe - 6
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: southern spain
Posts: 1,986
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That is the problem - we don´t. Some of the destinations being suggested sound to me like 10 to 20 pax max. How many people from the Essex and surrounding areas would want to go to Groningen - lovely city and oil related while Essex is not. Be very afraid I am sorry to say plus the lead-in time is not ideal - not much time for publicity, advertising etc. Sorry to be so negative but that is how I see it.
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That is the problem - we don´t. Some of the destinations being suggested sound to me like 10 to 20 pax max. How many people from the Essex and surrounding areas would want to go to Groningen - lovely city and oil related while Essex is not. Be very afraid I am sorry to say plus the lead-in time is not ideal - not much time for publicity, advertising etc. Sorry to be so negative but that is how I see it.
Some other destinations may have a higher proportion of UK-originating traffic but in general I see the marketing task as telling people in a few distinct and relatively small continental European markets that they now have the option of a direct flight to London.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: london
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stobart don't need to make a profit on the flights just approach break even. Each passenger through Southend generates £20 for Stobart. so 200000 passengers will generate around £4million
A company that manages only breakeven on a regular basis is ignoring the cost of capital. Running an airline is a capital intensive business and failure to make profits can only end in tears.
The conglomerates of the 1980s are no longer fashionable for a reason...
The conglomerates of the 1980s are no longer fashionable for a reason...
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To take Groningen as an example, I wouldn't expect many passengers from Essex - but that's not really the target market IMHO: I'd expect the traffic to be maybe 80%+ Dutch. The attraction is not Essex (or Groningen), the attraction is that this is a convenient direct flight to London for a market that doesn't have such a service.
Each passenger through Southend generates £20 for Stobart. so 200000 passengers will generate around £4million
I can only think of Manston that had its own airline to generate passengers and we all know how that ended.
I hope it all works out but I think it will be tough going.
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I doubt that Southend will charge anything for handling their own aircraft
Where on earth did the £20 figure comf from ? Totally arbitrary and pie in the sky, as other contributors have said few retail outlets, not all passengers parking and if easyJet are paying more than £1 - £2 per passenger I'd be surprised.
Serko, what is your source of this £20 figure?
Join Date: May 2002
Location: london
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From the stobart interim results presentation in fact the precise figure is £10.66 per passenger. Those tourists who don't pay for parking will probably get the train at the stobart operated station. Or hire a car. All of which are revenue generating. Stobart also run the airport retail themselves.
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can think offhand of several airports who offer new-route discounts, available only to the first carrier to start a route and not to any subsequent competitor entering that route. Are they doing something wrong?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hopefully it will be two new ATR72's that will be used and not the two oldest ATR72's (EI-REH & EI-REI). Personally I think BE willadd the following destinations from SEN
Maastricht (MST) - - Could be launched to replace FR's STN service that is due to end at the end of this week.
Münster-Osnabrück (FMO) - Could be launched to replace WX's LCY service that is due to end at the end of this week.
Nuremburg (NUE) - Could be launched to replace WX's LCY service that is due to end at the end of this week.
Rennes (RNS) - Destination already served by BE.
Maastricht (MST) - - Could be launched to replace FR's STN service that is due to end at the end of this week.
Münster-Osnabrück (FMO) - Could be launched to replace WX's LCY service that is due to end at the end of this week.
Nuremburg (NUE) - Could be launched to replace WX's LCY service that is due to end at the end of this week.
Rennes (RNS) - Destination already served by BE.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From the stobart interim results presentation in fact the precise figure is £10.66 per passenger. Those tourists who don't pay for parking will probably get the train at the stobart operated station. Or hire a car. All of which are revenue generating. Stobart also run the airport retail themselves.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can only think of Manston that had its own airline to generate passengers and we all know how that ended.
Sutton Harbour Holdings. They would have got away with, too, if it weren't for French&Rutter...
Sutton Harbour Holdings. They would have got away with, too, if it weren't for French&Rutter...
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
@BAladdy The six destination are set to be in Benelux and Northern Europe. Munster-Osnabruck may be considered as Northern Europe in the widest sense. Nuremberg and Rennes probably not (also given the FR service STN-NUE I doubt NUE would be a good idea at all from SEN with a Turboprop). EDIT: according to independent.ie "six routes for Flybe from the UK to destinations in the Benelux, France and Germany. Details of the exact routes won't be unveiled until next week." As such may Rennes be a possibility after all, and I guess FMO a given.
Last edited by insuindi; 26th Mar 2014 at 09:46.
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: England, UK
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I suspect MAN will appear as a route feeding the Flybe domestic hub. I also think CDG will be a route feeding an international hub. AMS is already served by Easyjet. Just my thoughts.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Oslo, Norway
Age: 63
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The joint flybe/Stobart Air press release states "six new routes to Northern Europe and Benelux countries". Now it all depends of what flybe/Stobart Air consider Northern Europe to be, but if we look at what United Nations and the European Union defines as Northern Europe; Germany isn't a part of Northern Europe. Northern Europe is the Nordic countries (minus Greenland) and the three Baltic countries. UN and EU don't agree about the status of the British Isles - EU include the British Isles in Western Europe while UN will have the British Isles to be a part of Northern Europe.
If we consider flybe/Stobart Air know what Northern Europe is, then we may be talking about a very few airports: airports in Denmark (EBJ and AAL are the only with no flights to STN), airports on the south west coast of Norway (SVG and BGO) and one airport on the west coast of Sweden (GOT). All these airports mentioned are less than 600 nautical miles from SEN, which I think a maximum leg length should be for the ATR.
If we consider flybe/Stobart Air know what Northern Europe is, then we may be talking about a very few airports: airports in Denmark (EBJ and AAL are the only with no flights to STN), airports on the south west coast of Norway (SVG and BGO) and one airport on the west coast of Sweden (GOT). All these airports mentioned are less than 600 nautical miles from SEN, which I think a maximum leg length should be for the ATR.