Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

Heathrow Plans (Merged)

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Heathrow Plans (Merged)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Sep 2008, 15:10
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: not a million miles from old BKK
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Curious Pax

Thanks for your response. The idea of moving the maintenance areas to Northolt would not work. The runway is only 5,500 ft long and as such could not accommodate A330/B777 or larger.
Northolt's primary importance would be to move all smaller aircraft movements from Heathrow in order to create more landing and take-off slots for larger aircraft there.
All B737, A319/320, MD80, Dash 8, ATR etc etc movements could be shifted to Northolt.
A taxyway between the two airports isn't really practical. Much better to move the passengers (themselves) quickly via a dedicated underground link.
But overall I am happy that someone read my post and thought about it. Thank you.
Xeque is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2008, 16:39
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes we should move all those pesky DHC8s and ATR42s to Northolt.
Xeque you make a few good points but your certainty is undermined by your obvious unfamiliarity with the subject matter....

Last time I tried it, getting from T4 to either T1,2 or 3 took something like 30 minutes - bus or underground. How long does it take to get to any other terminal from T5?
On this point on T5, it shouldn't happen a lot, if you are on a codeshare you go through Flight Connections not the Heathrow Express or the Piccadilly Line.
I appreciate that a lot of you guys outside the capital quite sensibly use AMS / CDG / FRA. As a London resident however, I all too aware that even if LHR lost the entire connectivity to the rest of the UK it still needs a third runwy and a lot of TLC even just serving London ! Cameron will see sense when he takes up the real responsibility of office I hope.

Last edited by Skipness One Echo; 23rd Sep 2008 at 22:10.
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2008, 21:24
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tees Valley
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What's the betting Boris's feasibility study decides that the idea of relocating is impractical, therefore giving the green light to the third runway. Just another political stunt.

I have taken to using the train rather than going through LHR recently, it's quicker and easier....

For long haul I always use Schipol anyway.
aeroDellboy is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2008, 22:34
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Live at LGW & Work in LHR .... Doh!
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I say that Boris better be kidding about all of this nonsense, considering the money and efforts we're currently expending to shuffle 52 out of 80 airlines around the CTA and T4 at Heathrow.

We're 10 months into the Central Terminal Area rebuild and there's a long way to go yet, the T2 demolition has been put back a year and HET is yet to even break ground.

The services gantry erected outside of T2 and the QB (Queens Building) has already cost as much as Boris' election campaign. That's going to carry allthe power, fluids and data around the demolition when it starts.

This is all without the cost of the gate reworking as well.

... and then he's gonna move it down the river eh . . . methinks not !!

AD
ArtfulDodger is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2008, 23:09
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2nd runway from Gastwick can operate from 2019, planned opening date of runway 3 at LHR is 2019/2020 - more or less the same
Sources for both please? I don't know the details of the LGW agreement but I really don't believe it would allow BAA/potential new owner to be busy building a runway and extra infrastructure for several years at LGW while the agreement was still in place prohiting just such expansion. And if it did - why are they not busy campaigning for a second runway at LGW now, instead of pursuing one at STN and making no mention of anything at LGW?

Also not convinced a new runway at LHR would take 12 years to build.

The fact remains it's much more more straightforward to expand LHR from a legality point of view. And also more sensible. LGW is not, at present, quite as congested as LHR, it has a backup runway to move onto when things go pear-shaped, and all signs are that many of its higher yielding airlines would be much happier moving their services up the road to LHR - such as CO recently pulling out of LGW altogether and buying more LHR slots.

For long haul I always use Schipol anyway.
Give T5 a shot, IMO a better airport experience than AMS, and indeed any other major European airport with the possible exception of MAD.

Maybe a better solution would be a taxiway between the 2
Sorry, but this whole Northolt idea, and in particular this suggestion, is just utterly ridiculous! The amount of housing, motorways,etc that you'd tear up to and general disruption caused to create some 5-mile long taxiway between the 2 airports would make LHR's 3rd runway look like nothing! Northolt is an important military airfield with a very short runway and heavily constrained movements due to nearby LHR anyway.

Think about the aircraft taxiing time (and associated waste of fuel) that's going to be involved by adding a third runway to the north of the existing ones.
You're shooting yourself in the foot. One of the key benefits of LHR's 3rd runway would be an enormous reduction in airborne and ground holding time, the benefits of which would far outweight any additional fuel penalties from increased taxiing time - not that I think there would be any. A 3rd runway would probably be accompanied by a 6th terminal to the north of the existing site as well, to serve it.
LHR27C is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2008, 00:52
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We're 10 months into the Central Terminal Area rebuild and there's a long way to go yet, the T2 demolition has been put back a year and HET is yet to even break ground.

The services gantry erected outside of T2 and the QB (Queens Building) has already cost as much as Boris' election campaign. That's going to carry allthe power, fluids and data around the demolition when it starts.
I wondered what that gantry thingy was for. Do we have a final closure date for Terninal 2 yet? Was through on Sat going to CDG and got a bit nostalgic.....though not a patch on T5 it is a piece of history that has been used into the ground alas.

Can anyone advise what the WIP is between the Europier and Pier 3? Is the structure going up part of Heathrow East and so Apron L PWFU?
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2008, 09:15
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well the Times article that claimed Ruth Kelly would shortly announce the go-ahead for Runway 3 was clearly rubbish.
manintheback is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2008, 10:33
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: FL 350
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post Third runway at Heathrow ‘is a done deal’ - even though public consultation goes on

Ministers are pressing ahead with plans for a highly controversial third runway at Heathrow and intend to approve the expansion before Christmas, The Times has learnt. Although the Government is still sifting through tens of thousands of public submissions on the airport’s proposed expansion, it is understood that senior figures have already decided to sanction it.
Third runway at Heathrow ‘is a done deal’ - even though public consultation goes on - Times Online
heli_port is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2008, 10:53
  #69 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good heavens! It's only taken them about 20 years to do the right thing then. Allow another 10 years for planning enquiries, and we might even double the T5 gestation period.

Meanwhile, traffic will be moving to the vastly better non-BAA airports across the channel. Too little, too late.
Rainboe is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2008, 10:58
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
During a major construction project, it is easy for mistakes to be made. Could we have a volunteer in the engineering company to turn the plans upside down, and bulldoze Stanwell to build the new runway to the South instead?
That way, when they spot the error, we can then go back to the original Northside position, and have 4 runways.
CarltonBrowne the FO is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2008, 10:58
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the article:

However The Times understands that Ruth Kelly, the Transport Secretary, strongly supports the proposal and is likely to make the announcement in its favour as early as November.
No, she's not!
northeast canuck is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2008, 11:35
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sandhurst, Berkshire
Age: 57
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why waste all that money on a new runway when the airport is gonna be closed and moved anyway?
scudpilot is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2008, 11:44
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: LHR
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's rumoured that Boris was shown the Blondie album cover "Parallel Lines" and thought it was a jolly good airport plan.
BikerMark is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2008, 11:58
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boris (not the spider)

Na - He was listening to REM's "You can't Get there fom here" Track at the time. Its the one after "Its the End of the World as we know it." - "and I feel fine "

CAT III (Automatic for the PPRUNE.)
Guest 112233 is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2008, 12:12
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Thailand
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A 3rd runway at LHR will not happen in our lifetimes.
Where will the money come from?
BAA/Ferrovial......I think not; The bankrupt Labour government, never...
Save your breath and discuss reality, not fantasies.
rubik101 is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2008, 12:16
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sandhurst, Berkshire
Age: 57
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
theres a bunch of irish lads doing a driveway just round the corner from me...looks like they have nearly finished and and will be looking for work soon... I am sure they could do a really cheap deal....
scudpilot is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2008, 12:18
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and bulldoze Stanwell to build the new runway
The Bulldozer would get stolen ! Have you ever been to stanwell ?
Will Hung is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2008, 12:21
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Glorious West Sussex
Age: 76
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Harry and Paul could build it in an afternoon....
A far better idea is to have four runways at Stansted, sell off LHR for squillions, and have peace and quiet in the skies over London.
TyroPicard is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2008, 12:43
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Live at LGW & Work in LHR .... Doh!
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do we have a final closure date for Terninal 2 yet?


Skipness One Echo, we're currently working to a closure of LHR T2 this time next year, but we think that's gonna move again.

AD
ArtfulDodger is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2008, 13:32
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A 3rd runway at LHR will not happen in our lifetimes.
Where will the money come from?
BAA/Ferrovial......I think not; The bankrupt Labour government, never...
Save your breath and discuss reality, not fantasies.
Do you really think BAA would be campaigning so hard, and the government investing so much time in a public consultation for a 3rd runway at LHR if, as soon as it was given the go-ahead, they turned round and said sorry we can't afford it?
LHR27C is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.