Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

The Lufthansa / BMI Thing (merged)

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

The Lufthansa / BMI Thing (merged)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Jun 2009, 11:43
  #261 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: London,England
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There is much surgery to come at LHR but the unions having blocked much of the change for now but that wont last.
Utter tripe, the only thing that has ever held back change at LHR is short sighted, small minded and incompetent "management" at all levels of the operation and it's them who will feel the pain of the surgery which is sure to come.

Last edited by Max Angle; 29th Jun 2009 at 13:48.
Max Angle is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2009, 13:16
  #262 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: He was here a moment ago
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looking further ahead, will BD, LH, Star etc have a major hand in the design and specification of Heathrow East? As I understand it that will be an (almost?) Star exclusive terminal with LHBD as the host airline.
ara01jbb is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2009, 13:52
  #263 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: gate 67 JFK
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Max Angle

Agreed and they must be cacking themselfs, but LHR is over crewed, too many Captains, out dated scope clause, much change to accross the group me thinks
INKJET is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2009, 15:40
  #264 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: London,England
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The scope clause (which for those outside of bmi attempts, largely unsuccessfully, to limit the number of non-mainline aircraft that operate at LHR) is irrelevant, any route that can only support an EMB145 will be stopped and the slot either sold or used for something more useful. The very fact that such small aircraft are operating for us at LHR is a classic example of the failure of the company to attract passengers and compete on routes where we have quality competition and the "slot husbandry" that has characterised the last 5-6 years at bmi.
Max Angle is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2009, 17:20
  #265 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: UK - Hants
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Am I right in thinking that bmi, along with other airlines, have negotiated their way out of the use-it-or-lose-it slot rules for this current summer season (and are currently trying to get the same agreement for this coming Winter season)?

Changes in the short-term may therefore become possible if true.
11K-AVML is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2009, 22:24
  #266 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Spin City
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6, my good fellow, you say:

"As the biggest player in the Star Alliance it would make perfect sense to utilise bmi as their conduit for expanding the Star presence at LHR. Building the operation around the global needs of Star carriers that use LHR as a hub. Quite simply, forget how bmi have approached the airlines business in the past.

Possible expansion by bmi operating Long haul routes that are prohibitive to the larger Star airlines at present to less well known destinations that may be of benefit to Star as a whole. Opening up access of bmi slots to benefit other larger Star carriers."


I admire your apparent celebration of the union that is the 'Star' but nonetheless it is only an alliance. Any individual airline, whilst appeasing the shareholders, with only self satisfy. Perhaps the utopian global network exists elsewhere in the ether, but the reality is somewhat different.

The Dr.
Dr. Spin is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2009, 23:42
  #267 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dr, a very valid point, but we are no longer merely in an alliance with Lufthansa. As a wholly-owned subsidiary (for the last 40 minutes anyway) we now have the potential to contribute to their bottom line.
According to Lufthansa's presentation to investors issued yesterday, we are another unit in the group, given similar same status as Swiss and SN Brussels.
Perhaps the utopian global network is on the way?
CarltonBrowne the FO is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2009, 07:45
  #268 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: essex
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Carlton B

we are another unit in the group, given similar same status as Swiss and SN Brussels.
Perhaps the utopian global network is on the way?



Maybe. But I would sound a note of caution. There are references to the short-term where there is some rationalizartion and reconfiguration. Direct reference to the Emb re slots and paying the same landing fee as a 747.

Could be a very good sign. But could also entail short-term reconstruction.
sweetie76 is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2009, 08:07
  #269 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: BHX LXR ASW
Posts: 2,272
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Welcome to Lufthansa - UK everyone. I hope all goes well for you and you start a new life working for Managers that can run an airline efficiently.

Good luck to you all
crewmeal is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2009, 14:50
  #270 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How many A330 does bmi have and which destination (with frequencies) are served by the A330? Any chance to see the A330 between London and NY?
Seljuk22 is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2009, 15:14
  #271 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Wherever my current employers wish to send me !!
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Only if someone pinches it !!!
Little Blue is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2009, 21:48
  #272 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Spin City
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"According to Lufthansa's presentation to investors issued yesterday, we are another unit in the group, given similar same status as Swiss and SN Brussels.
Perhaps the utopian global network is on the way?
"

Thanks Carlton, but I was referring to the bmi position within the 'global' Star Alliance and not just within the LH group. bmi would of course expect to merge seamlessly into the LH family without hostility to other LH group carriers.
Dr. Spin is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2009, 22:02
  #273 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Spin City
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now that it's official, I was hoping to receive a little more than a memo from Nigel on the changes at board level which is essentially meaningless to staff at the operational level.

What we need is for the new Chairman to outline his aspirations and direction for the company, within the group and the marketplace, to quash any fears and stimulate enthusiasm.

A little public morale boosting is long overdue since the outgoing chairman was distinctly lacking in that department.

This deal was a long time in the making and it's imperative that the new chairman starts off on the right foot.
Dr. Spin is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2009, 09:52
  #274 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bmi have three currently employed to Cairo,Tel Aviv and Saudi Arabia.

Bmi would be very foolish to try LHR-JFK as there is little *A feed beyond the New York terminal.
United couldn't even even make it work and they would be the *A feeder!

Further this route absolutely doesn't need ANY further capacity what so ever.
rutankrd is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2009, 17:45
  #275 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK - Near LHR
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There may be no feed from JFK but bmi are missing out on the revenue that could be earnt from all to passengers that transit onto the TLV / AMM / BEY / CAI from JFK.
LHRKLBD is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2009, 21:45
  #276 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well in the case of Cairo *A partner Egyptair fly DIRECT and as i keep pointing out if transit is necessary then *A partner LH will route you through FRA with NO ADP, or Transit Visas necessary.

Amman and Beirut well they continue to get quite a bit of traffic from the BA codeshare.

Any actual USA-Mid East connecting traffic is sufficiently routed via Washington/Chicago and LAX and of cause the Largest long haul *A operator at LHR Air Canada.

New York -LHR just DOES NOT figure in *A fact.
rutankrd is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2009, 09:58
  #277 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rutankrd, although LHR-New York is not currently a Star Alliance route, and even after Continental join will still be a small factor, the fact remains that it is one of the busiest longhaul routes in the world.
Although it is in cutthroat competition at the moment, it has in happier times supplied something like 65% of BA's profits. I would be greatly surprised if LH do not have a plan for the route- whether that plan involves bmi, however, I have no idea.
CarltonBrowne the FO is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2009, 18:02
  #278 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the answers.
I think LH have other problems (take over OS, SN and bmi) right now then opening NYLON but in the future when the economy is growing again (summer 2010) I could imagine something to come.
With CO joining STAR there will be STAR on NYLON.

London - New York market still evolving as Virgin Atlantic celebrates 25th anniversary on the route | anna.aero
Seljuk22 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.