Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

MD80 plane crash in Phuket, Sep. 07

Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

MD80 plane crash in Phuket, Sep. 07

Old 16th Sep 2007, 19:28
  #41 (permalink)  
PJ2
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: BC
Age: 72
Posts: 2,436
Or am I just talking rubbish
I don't think so. The deep drainage ditch is also on the north side. The accident site seems in-line with the edge of the forest and the terminal ramp area in the background, as you say. From the photo inserted, (of the whole airfield), that line would be approximately half way, perhaps a bit further, down the north side of the runway.

Very sad day for world aviation.

Last edited by PJ2; 16th Sep 2007 at 19:31. Reason: update with reference to new photos
PJ2 is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2007, 19:36
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: washington,dc
Posts: 486
while the METAR doesn't reflect it, does anyone know if:

lightning had been seen in the area?

or

if the low level windshear alert system had issued a warning?
bomarc is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2007, 20:05
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kent
Posts: 56
Eyewitness account from Canadian survivor.

"We started to go for the landing and he just about hit the runway, but couldn't make it, so he lifted back up. We started to circle. I thought he was going to circle back around and try again, and then we took a sharp right and we started going for the ground."

Passenger says she adopted brace position at this point.

"We bounced once and then went straight into an embankment with trees and bushes.

"It was raining really hard. We saw a couple of people who were on fire."
nippysweetie is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2007, 20:09
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Switzerland, Singapore
Posts: 1,306
It's most certainly on 09. The accident site is nearly at the end of the runway, which would have been the beginning of 27, so hardly possible.

The tail lays this way because the aircraft bounced into the wall and started to turn.

Dani
Dani is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2007, 20:29
  #45 (permalink)  
Fly Conventional Gear
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Winchester
Posts: 1,602
It's most certainly on 09. The accident site is nearly at the end of the runway, which would have been the beginning of 27, so hardly possible.
It looks like 27 to me, you can see planes in the background in one of the pictures which suggests that the picture was taken facing south, which puts the wreckage half about half to two thirds down 27.
Contacttower is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2007, 20:38
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: washington,dc
Posts: 486
I think it is 27

I think it is 27 because the slope of the runway seen in the background appears to be downhill...elevation of 27 is 82 feet sloping down to 19 feet on the other end.

does this make sense?
bomarc is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2007, 20:54
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Europe
Age: 69
Posts: 206
Dani, how do you account for the wreckage trail, clearly visible on one of the photos, if the a/c had turned around. The FACTS will emerge soon enough, but to me it looks pretty sure that it was 27. [note the survivor report re the right turns too).
Sobelena is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2007, 21:07
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Trumpton
Posts: 54
It was raining very hard today in south Phuket and with a lot of sudden, but short-lived, gusts of wind. It's raining again now.
One poster on Thaivisa.com stated that he lives near the runway and the wind was very strong just at the time the plane was landing.
LordLucan is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2007, 21:26
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: France
Age: 76
Posts: 136
Just watched BBC News ar 10 (Sunday night). According to the fragrant Emily Maitlis, the a/c came in "fast and hard" Fast? what was Vref? What was the additive for prevailing wind/gusr? What was the actual approach speed? And therefore was it "fast"? Why don't journos (of which my daughter is one) consult one of us before publishing?

What is meant by hard?

Oh dear.
Finbarr is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2007, 21:33
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: washington,dc
Posts: 486
microburst/windshear?

this reminds me so much of a crash in the US about 13 years ago...go around and then hit by microburst.

right now that is what I have to think in this scenario.

long ago, I decided that if a go around and windshear were mixed...might be better to put it on the runway and take your chances there.
bomarc is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2007, 21:48
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: England
Posts: 473
Deepest sympathy to all affected by this tragedy.

I have been through Phuket once, and on the morning of departure it received extremely heavy rainfall. I suspected that the standing water was deep enough to constitute a contaminant. Initially I could get no information from the airport authority and a request to inspect the runway surface was met with resistance - so I refused to depart. By the time that I persuaded them to take me out to the runway, the rain had been stopped for a while and the surface was drying. During this time other aircraft continued to use the runway. My aircraft docs class a 3mm depth of water as contaminated and the landing distance and crosswind limit are then heavily factored.

Let's hope some old lessons have not just been re-learned.
Brain Potter is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2007, 21:57
  #52 (permalink)  
PJ2
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: BC
Age: 72
Posts: 2,436
Dani;

Re 27 vice 09, the following image may assist:

(removed)

The "geometry" of your suggested position doesn't work. The X's mark areas where I believe you are suggesting the site is, but there isn't any other place on the airfield where the view that is being widely broadcast, can look like the inset. The arrow marks an approximate line of sight, give or take...

The tail didn't "swing around" as there are no tell-tale gouges in the ground.

As mentioned, comments from passengers indicate a right turn.

Last edited by PJ2; 17th Sep 2007 at 14:33.
PJ2 is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2007, 22:14
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Closer than you think
Posts: 90
Why don't journos...consult one of us before publishing?
You'd be amazed at the nonsensical "facts" I've been fed by the "one of us" brigade - usually when they're basing their "expertise" entirely on shaky crash footage from (ironically) Sky News.
TwoOneFour is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2007, 22:56
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: wales (new south)
Posts: 80
The wind direction implies that it should have been 27, I agree that the red dot seems the most resting spot from the view of planes in the background

Either way as it looks like it came to rest halfway up the runway there must have been a lot of energy left to disipate
RogerTangoFoxtrotIndigo is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2007, 22:58
  #55 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
PJ2- good bit of research. However I believe you can recognise the gap in the tree line by the coast, and lining that up with the trees at the corner where the taxiway meets the apron, it would appear that the site is halfway between your X and the red circle?
Rainboe is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2007, 23:58
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,376
Runway 27 ILS doesn't quite line up with the runway and while it wil help you find it, it's not an approach I would like to fly right to the minima with those hills either side.

Usual journalistic rubbish coming out "Pilot was given permission to abort his landing." I didn't think I had to ask if I needed to go around.
Metro man is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2007, 01:39
  #57 (permalink)  
PJ2
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: BC
Age: 72
Posts: 2,436
Rainboe;

TwoOneFour's notion got me looking more closely. I'm still looking at the various photos/video-stills. I see what you mean in re the trees/gap etc. I think it could perhaps be a bit closer to the X (north side) but not much. In GoogleEarth for example there is a road from the north which comes up to the perimeter of the field and then T's east and west. I'm thinking that it came to rest near that road, slightly before or after. Any location well before that point begins to place the 737 on the ramp "out of position", (not enough out in the open). Here's another view:



The whole exercise will be academic shortly - we'll all know quite quickly where the actual scene was with continued photo coverage.

I often wish the news media would do this kind of elementary homework. A lot of basic questions can be answered with a general layout of the accident scene but the media just never get it or even think to ask these kinds of questions.

The BBC video purporting to be "right after" the accident doesn't verify "strong" winds but there appears a 10 to 15kt wind blowing - nothing dramatic, and while there is rain, it's not the kind described by many including the media - one expected the kind of weather that Singapore 006 encountered for example, which was far more "severe" (that is the term used by eyewitnesses), than the weather both video'd and reported in the METARs at the time of the accident. An interview with another gentlemen from Flight International mentions windshear but such phenomena almost always come from thunderstorms and there were none reported in the METARS - the METAR is entirely unremarkable, so we'll have to wait to see what went unreported, unobserved, if anything.

Are we getting the impression from passenger accounts that this occurred on the first go-around? It will be interesting too, to learn what the words "then we took a sharp right and we started going for the ground" and the report that the a/c "bounced" before colliding with the embankment/drainage ditch. Several scenarios present themselves.

PJ

Last edited by PJ2; 17th Sep 2007 at 01:53.
PJ2 is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2007, 03:18
  #58 (permalink)  
Lee
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 168
Indonesian pilot killed in the crash

Read the headlines in today's The Jakarta Post that an Indonesain pilot was killed in the crash.

Does anyone know if he was flying the aeroplane or was he just a passenger?

Thanks.
Lee is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2007, 03:22
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: CNX/AGP
Posts: 72
According to local Thai TV news, both captain and first officer survived.
TG345 is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2007, 04:09
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 332
Monday morning and the armchair quarter backs are in full swing!

(1) PJ2, you say, the whole thing will be academic shortly - we'll know where the actual scene was, etc. Mate - the people who need to know already know where the crash site is, which rwy they were using, etc. All this analysis with colour pics, lines, etc, sits up there with people who slow down in their cars passing a car accident. Frankly, it's pointless speculating - what we do know is that the aircraft crashed, people are dead. Drawing lines on photos is pretty "academic".

(2) Trying to analyse METARs, ATIS's etc is similarly pointless. Anyone who has flown into Thailand knows that actual conditions and reported METARs or ATIS's can be like chalk and cheese. I too thought the METARs looked pretty benign - but then I remembered the location... the country. Armchair analysis from afar achieves nothing. The FDR and the airspeed/ground speed parameters, plus any recorded weather parameters from ATC are what's needed. Can't analyse that via PPRuNe.

My broad point is: once again there is way too much Monday morning analysis going on about yet another LoCo accident. I'm actually GLAD the media doesn't do this sort of analysis - can you imagine the waffle that would fill the rags then? And as professional pilots we really should be refraining from speculating.

Let's pray for the souls and leave it to the experts on the scene to figure out.
Ron & Edna Johns is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.