Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Ryanair - 5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Apr 2007, 11:41
  #141 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wrong again!

Ryanair didn't revolutionise air travel, it was SouthWest Airlines boss Herb Kelleher who did that. And he at least did it with grace and good humour by all accounts. His passengers and staff are happy with the service and treatment they get.

Your problem is you actually believe your own propoganda!

What O'Leary did was to filch the SouthWest LoCo model and turn it into a pointlessly nasty and relentlessly exploitative get rich quick scam.

However for now, shall we get back to the old rumours and news?
What you really mean to say is 'I only want to read good news and positive spin about FR please'.
maxalt is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2007, 11:47
  #142 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: STN
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well BA soon dropped GO airlines, The worst thing they ever did
and I would rather get back to the main thread as Ryanair have
just announced another Three routes, by the way how many new
routes has BA announced in 2007 ????
DONTTELLTHEPAX is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2007, 12:15
  #143 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hitchin
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dropped three routes at the same time.
Powerjet1 is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2007, 12:41
  #144 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Err...money?
Food?
Shelter?
hmmmmm, in some other threads you or your friends claimed that they get no money or not enough money. In this thread you claim that FR fly unsafe and you need the money (that you do not get, referring to the other thread).
What now?
janus627 is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2007, 12:46
  #145 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1997
Location: 5530N
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
where's leo these days? I miss his rants.
Bearcat is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2007, 13:20
  #146 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chester
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, I am not wrong. I said Ryanair has revolutionised our travel patterns, meaning this side of the atlantic. As all my recent comparisons have been against BA, this was surely obvious- Southwest offers a slightly different model and operates only in North America- you can clearly see I am not from the US (neither are most people in this discussion), hence it is FR and NOT Southwest who have revolutionised OUR travel patterns.

And please stop it with the conspiracy theory, propaganda idea. Lower fares for me, the consumer, in return for less assistance when a flight is cancelled and a lower standard of in-flight service is a good trade-off. This is hardly propaganda, this is what customers want. The option of the full-service carriers is still there and people still have the choice to fly such carriers, however people like myself have voted with our feet (excuse the horrid cliche). You simply can't argue with recent passenger growth! This can only indicate that FR are providing SOMETHING consumers want in the industry.

Are you currently seeking another job at another carrier then, Maxalt?
Euroboy39 is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2007, 15:22
  #147 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: norway
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ryanair-5

Wrong again, Maxalt. It was neither Ryanair nor Skywest who revolutionised air travel.
It was Freddy Laker.
pineridge is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2007, 15:43
  #148 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Euroland
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All wrong it was the Wright brothers
Shanwickman is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2007, 16:05
  #149 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: STN
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So how many new routes have BA announced so far
in 2007? I must have mist your reply
DONTTELLTHEPAX is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2007, 16:28
  #150 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: On the Camel's back
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So how many new routes have BA announced so far
in 2007?
"British Airways is to start new routes from London Gatwick to Port of Spain in Trinidad and Tobago, Dresden in Germany and Sarajevo in Bosnia and Herzegovina from March 2007."
Plus several from London City.

Please, can we just move on from this pointless debate?
Ah, so safety is "pointless" now. Please explain why this is so?

If you dislike FR so much, move jobs, fly BA.
This old chestnut yet again. If I move, I merely postpone the day that ryr's low standards come to get me, as others are forced to adapt to compete. So now's the time to stay and fight for an improvement which will benefit all. Do you always run away yourself when the going gets a bit tough?

the naiive ignorant ones
Touche.

Agree to disagree?
What exactly do we disagree on? Do you disagree that ryr is less safe than other carriers? If so, do you disagree that safety breaches occur with monotonous regularity? Do you disagree that the IAA are unable to regulate with the robustness required? Or perhaps you simply disagree as you don't like what you're reading?
The only thing I'm agreeing is that your head is in the sand. If you want to continue to support a poorer safety culture and a poorer record than most other western carriers, that's your decision. However, don't try to imply that those who know and care are wrong.

Janus,
Ryr don't pay enough money, but I need what they do pay. Running away won't solve the problem as everyone else will be undercut in time. The attitude of ryr management produces both problems: excessive greed which precludes proper pay and promotes corner cutting.
CamelhAir is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2007, 16:31
  #151 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK Mr donttellthepax, it's spelled "missed" and for those numpties comparing Ryanair and BA in this excuse for a willy waving contest, they should know they are comparing apples and oranges.
If you need THAT analogy explained to you then God help us all........
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2007, 16:52
  #152 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Luton
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can tell who the spotters are on this tread

I find all this more than interesting, keep it going
hatters united is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2007, 17:57
  #153 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How can BA and FR be compared?

BA operates from the busiest interational airport in the world...FR have airports PAY them to serve there! (Derry)

BA offer complimentary in-flight meals with drinks, while FR charge rediculous prices for food and drink.

BA operate out of Heathrow and Gatwick, and therefore cannot start routes 'willy nilly' as the airports are slot constrained. FR fly to airports where they may be the only scheduled carrier, and can therefore pick times that suit their schedule.

Comparing a National Carrier and a foreign LC airline really isn't worth it.

Try FR v EZY
MUFC_fan is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2007, 18:42
  #154 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ryanair and Wizzair

Last week, Ryanair announced that they are binning HHN-Krakow, which competes to a large extent with Wizzair's HHN-KTW.

Today, Ryanair announced that NYO - Gdansk will be dropped. Wizzair have been operating the route since the end of 2005.

As far as I can remember, Ryanair are not in the habit of dropping routes with direct competition (as Easyjet, Aer Lingus, bmiBaby, TFly and many others will testify). So what is going on here?

Have Ryanair finally found a rival who can compete on price? (Although I imagine that Wizzair's labour costs may well be lower, surely the current cost of leasing and Ryanair's greater economies of scale must tip the balance in their favour)

Or, is there something more sinister afoot?
anna_list is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2007, 18:53
  #155 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wouldn't that be ironic!

In their self instigated race to the bottom, FR may eventually be defeated by carriers that can operate in even cheaper environments then they do.

I shudder to think what the final result will look like, but at least O'Leary will get a poke in the eye. The image of FR being slagged off as bloated and wasteful by some future Chinese LoCo tycoon sure tickles me.
maxalt is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2007, 08:33
  #156 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't Bonderman an investor in both airlines, perhaps Wizzair will be the new takeover target for Ryanair ?

Wizzair are the only low lost airline to stick to secondary airports, Charleroi, Beauvais, Skavsta etc. It would be just like O'Leary to confuse the whole EI takeover issue by lobbing in another takeover in the middle of it.
The_Bean_Counter is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2007, 13:05
  #157 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Flensborg
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the unidentified order about 30 B787 is for AA! So we can be shure that MOL isn't involved into it
FOS-06 is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2007, 15:18
  #158 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would be a good buy for FR, but there would be alot of alterations to do, especially with crew for the chane of Airbus to Boeing.
MUFC_fan is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2007, 19:21
  #159 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Camel jockey
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't Bonderman an investor in both airlines,
and continental,,,
which needs to be considered when looking at ryr going to the US because ryr is now the largest shareholder in aer lingus.
The European commission on fair trade has made it clear that they are unlikely to allow ryr to acquire aer lingus.
So now where does this leave MOL.
It leaves him holding a large amount of shares with his main competitor out of Dublin. So now what does he do. Support his arch rival and maintain the value of the share, shares that where purchased with money that does not belong to him, shares that where purchased without the knowledge of the board of directors and principle share holders in the US and London.But by supporting them he undermines ryr and thus but pressure on the ryr share price. so what else...
F*%k it he says lets off load them.
Well now Mick, me thinks you have a bit of a problem there. This would have to be done even more secretly
than when he purchased them, for the slightest hint that he intended to sell shares would send them to-wards where-st he came from. And even if he does keep it quite the fact that he is trying to off load 25% of the shares well,,,, if you where a share broker what would you offer him. oh i don't know lets say 75 cent,
so 1.4 billion spent on shares at the purchase rate 2.50 (i think) and sold at 75 cent. Do the maths folks,.
Mick has dug himself a big hole and there isn't anyone is gives a f*%k about him enough to throw him a life line..
RYR will not be going to the US. RYR will not be purchasing aer lingus and all that money that mad Micky boy has spent on aer lingus might as well have been pissed up against the wall.
And david bonderman had no idea he was doing it,,,,,,
bia botal is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2007, 19:38
  #160 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yet MOL is still one of the greatest CEOs in any industry of his generation.
MUFC_fan is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.