Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

GATWICK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th May 2006, 16:52
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Gatwick
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the olden days

I agree with you there Unstable, I was one of them there engineers up until I got sock of the BA management (I was ex-B-Cal) in 1990 and moved into IT.
bbrown1664 is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2006, 10:17
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STANSTED & MANCHESTER
Posts: 1,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gatwick

Sorry but I cant find a Gatwick thread, so opened another, sorry if I missed it.

Can anyone tell me if at LGW, you can do TWILIGHT check-in for (TOM)
and if so what is the earliest time I can do this.

many thanks DAZ211.
daz211 is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2006, 10:42
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Barton Upon Humber
Posts: 1,984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In other LGW news, Sterling are starting 6 flights a week to Stockholm Arlanda next summer
airhumberside is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2006, 22:17
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 648
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lets hope Sterling will be a little more careful while landing at LGW than what they appear to be at CPH according to some reports. DUCK!

Last edited by nivsy; 15th Oct 2006 at 22:21. Reason: spelling
nivsy is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2006, 06:35
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gatwick Growth

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/s...es/6064660.stm

And er Gatwick Airport is in West Sussex!
725308 is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2006, 07:51
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The airport has switched between Surrey and West Sussex a few times and it actually has a Surrey postcode.
Confirmed Must Ride is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2006, 07:59
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: EGKK
Age: 42
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But today, the airport boundary is completely within the administrative area of Crawley Borough in West Sussex.

Postcode is irrelevant, there is no such thing as a "Surrey Postcode", because Postcodes are based on postal towns, and do not recognise county boundaries (e.g. Nottingham East Midlands Airport has a Derby postcode, but is in Leicestershire).

[Edit: The BBC News article has been corrected.]

Last edited by Localiser Green; 19th Oct 2006 at 10:31.
Localiser Green is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2006, 08:47
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sussex
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LGW bus frequency

Can any regular user of the remote staff car parks at LGW tell me the frequency of the buses, and does it tail off during the night?
N.S. Sherlock is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2006, 09:34
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: ex ZB and back
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
10 mins, H24. Leaves on the hour and every 10 mins from Concord House and X car park. I think the North terminal one leaves 5 mins later (or earlier??). My experience it's quite reliable.
Splat is online now  
Old 7th Nov 2006, 19:12
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Crawley
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA LGW GB handling contract lost.

Today it was annouced that the GB baggage handling operation at LGW will be moved to another company. This will happen within the next 2 weeks and only affects the loading/baggage sections. Check-in, Load Control and Dispatch will remain at BA for now.

With Virgin taking on the GB engineering contract it seems that there will be an interesting array of colours and company logos on stands in the north terminal!

Who thought that we could all come together and work in harmony for the benefit of the paying passenger.
Barts is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2006, 19:22
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Crawley, UK
Age: 41
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fantastic! Whoever has the new contract has got to be better than the current baggage company. Our flights are always delayed because of baggage!
Gatwick07 is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2006, 19:27
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sandcastle 2
Age: 39
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Latest rumour going around is that it has apparently been confirmed, GB will lose the franchise earlier than 2010.
Aparently BA crew at Gatwick have had a memo saying were going to lose it sometime in 2008.

BA are doing a cracking job of cocking everything up this month aren't they. Sorry I shouldn't say BA, i mean WW.

I just feel sorry for those who have to work for him, I say lets get out of the franchise on our terms and get on with doing things our own way.
Maz11 is online now  
Old 7th Nov 2006, 19:36
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun.
Posts: 48
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Barts
Today it was annouced that the GB baggage handling operation at LGW will be moved to another company. This will happen within the next 2 weeks and only affects the loading/baggage sections. Check-in, Load Control and Dispatch will remain at BA for now.

With Virgin taking on the GB engineering contract it seems that there will be an interesting array of colours and company logos on stands in the north terminal!

Who thought that we could all come together and work in harmony for the benefit of the paying passenger.
Along time coming, good news.Looks iffy for the franchise renewal though. The futures bright the futures Orange
phantom menace is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2006, 20:08
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: The Beautiful South
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil

Anyone confirm how many of the GB flights out of LGW are actually BA routes ??
cirrus01 is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2006, 20:57
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: LHR
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA are doing a cracking job of cocking everything up this month aren't they. Sorry I shouldn't say BA, i mean WW.
Do you really think that carrying on business as a handling agent for one of your own franchisees at one of your own main bases is a core business interest for BA?
Perhaps the BA loaders at LGW who have been determined to carry on in their good old fashioned 'comfy' ways have left it rather too late to wake up and smell the coffee? If your costs are too high the customer will buy elsewhere.... Aviance in this case.

BA and GB will divorce very soon. GB is a liability to BA and on the other side GB is fed up with being told by BA what routes it may fly and those it may not. There is no benefit left in the marriage for either party.

Some of GB's routes are operated using BA route licences that go back to BEA times. I don't see BA giving those up for one moment. GB clearly thinks it can go it alone with it's remaining route portfolio and the core holiday company business.

Only time will tell.
Magplug is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2006, 22:21
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking of the GB franchise renewal (or not) in 2008, the Loganair one too would also seem to be on dodgy ground, what's the current score with BMED's marriage? Can't really see how Sun Air and Comair etc. fit into BA's grand plan (?) either...

Looks to me as though they are heading for a structure not dissimilar to the big Mid-east players with a single core and a relatively limited local network, also the letters BOAC spring to mind don't really remember though if they operated much inside Europe.

What go's around....

PP
Pickled Props is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2006, 22:32
  #37 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,146
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Magplug
Do you really think that carrying on business as a handling agent for one of your own franchisees at one of your own main bases is a core business interest for BA?
Not a 'core' business interest but a 100% valid business interest.

In the past 20 years, I have watched the band wagon of outsourcing roll through countless companies and organisations and governments. The end result is very rarely an improvement of service to the customer. The accountants love it but you upset your staff and your customers.

As a manger, when something goes wrong, you cannot reach out and grab the the throat of the person who mucked it up - because they are not your person and getting a discipline charge through is a legal minefield. The contract is full of Service Level Agreements that, on the day can do nothing to improve things. There are all the promises that it won't happen again - and it does. The reason is simple, the chain of command is too long and has too many kinks in it.

Example: A company in the UK had difficulty delivering it's product as it was being subject to intimidation on unofficial picket lines. Whilst the Police would help, the drivers were simply refusing to drive anywhere near them. The boss summeds the transport manager to tell him to tell the drivers to drive. But the drivers had been outsourced to a UK company, who then sub-contracted to an Italian company who was the actual employer and it took some time for the problem to be overcome.

Getting bags on and off might not be core business but it has the chance to ruin your core business faster than almost everything else. Since bag handling affects the vast majority of your customers (depending upon long or short and tiem of day etc.) then getting it right is of the greatest importance.

I speak as one who has been on the inside of outsourcing as well as the unhappy recipient on the outside. The sooner this fad passes, the better.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2006, 08:00
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All BA Franchise deals will end shortly...

WW has no time for Franchise partnerships. Its not his business to ask 'outside' airlines to fly for him, using his brand, but when the whole thing started many years ago, it was acceptable as BA couldnt do the flights themselves and a different management structure was in place. Yes BA got the 'credit' and publicity as the public saw BA everywhere, but onboard and behind the scenes the product was being delivered inconsistantly and with some parts not delivering at all, and damaging the image of BA. This wasnt neccessarily the fault of the 'operator' or arm of the franchise as money always dictates the level of service you provide ie staff levels, training and investment etc. However WW sees no requirement for them now and is chopping the non-core (everything except LHR and T5) 'willy-nilly' and has no mercy.

Look at the UK Regions. We are facing a serious and critical review since the announcement that BAConnect is going to flybe.com. Justification to maintain the stations (EDI GLA ABZ and MAN) as BA Mainline stations with their own staff is currently being looked at by senior London based management and an announcement is due within weeks. With BAConnect making up the bulk of the regions daily work load, what future do we have without Connect? LGW is allegedly under the spotlight with loadfactors between the regions very poor although we are told that its easyjets fault... Really? Who said that Easyjet would never survive? A slap in the face for BA? LGW does its bit for the company and should be recognised accordingly. If LGW drops domestic UK flights then that leaves only LHR as a minline service. Can you honestly see BA keeping a full compliment of staff at the regional airports, with their terms and conditions and all the facilities (baggage office, ticketing desks, dispatch, loading section, check-in, restrooms etc) just for LHR? I dont think so. I would really like to beleive they would as I face unemployment through this. let me stress that NOTHING has been confirmed regarding our future in the regions yet, but the information we have, and from what we do know about WW then it does not look good at all. Oh, shouldnt forget our friends at Loganair. Guys, you will be next to leave the BA family - trust me.

Without the franchise agreements, the regions will suffer and sooner or later close. Handling agents can do the same job, for less. Give them a uniform and the public dont know the difference. By the way, Iam not having a go at handling agents. Ive been there and they work hard - looking after many airlines and provide the same service but at a lower cost than having in-house staff.

PS - The fuel surcharge issue, the pension nightmare, the move to T5 and the badly needed replacement for the B737/B747-400 (early models) as well as general fleet expansion issues, should keep WW in a job long after our futures are decided...

Last edited by tristar500; 8th Nov 2006 at 08:23.
tristar500 is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2006, 11:51
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry, but the notion, sometimes popular within BA, that the franchises did not deliver a product up to BA standrads is simply untrue. The franchises have consistently each outperformed BA in delivering each and every one of its own specifications,- and this is as measured by BA itself. The franchises have added enormously to the reach and effectiveness of BA's frequent flyer programmes in the provinces and have operated routes which for the most part would be totally uneconomic to BA with its high overheads and terms and conditions way above those paid by the regionals. Through their fees they have given BA, for almost no capital investment of its own,a guaranteed profit. Overseas , Comair has given BA a reach into the South African and southern Africa regional market that it could never have achieved on its own and which many competitors would dearly love. The pity was that BA lost interest in the franchising idea some time ago and what was a highly successful business is being left to wither on the vine. For those franchises which have been bought by BA there has been little chance of survival once the accountants have insisted they be donated a chunk of BA's central overheads, IT costs etc.
Skylion is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2006, 13:32
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: here there and everywhere
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Maz11
Aparently BA crew at Gatwick have had a memo saying were going to lose it sometime in 2008.
BA crew or GB crew? I haven't received anything from crewlink/email/letter about that and neither did mr FBW.
flybywire is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.