Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

PRESTWICK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Oct 2013, 10:02
  #1261 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Irvine
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In this case renationalisation is the answer. Prestwick Airport was making a profit prior to being owned by Infratil and it can with the right management, make a profit again. To say that renationalisation is never the answer is just wrong. Renationalised East Coast Trains have just made £200 million for the UK Govt. The alternative was that Infratil were going to close the airport which I've no doubt would delight some people.

Last edited by james170969; 9th Oct 2013 at 10:04.
james170969 is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2013, 10:10
  #1262 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whilst I certainly don't want jobs to be lost, nationalization is never the answer.
It's usually not the answer, however a pragmatic person makes case by case judgements and avoids dogma. If PIK closes, Scotland as a country has no airfields anywhere near the size and capability for cargo and military. How much more of Scotland's freight do we want roaded from England?

btw Is Rolls Royce still in business? Why? It was nationalised after going bust due to development issues with the soon to be world class RB211 engine.
it soon became clear the offer was nonsense.
I am curious to hear what you mean by "nonsense"? Poaching customers from your competitors is pretty par for the course in the business tbh.
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2013, 10:12
  #1263 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blighty
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Has any kind of purchase price been announced ? If Infratil sell PIK for a nominal £1 it is an excellent deal for the Govt, while if the price was £1bn it's not such a good deal. Anything in between is a grey area....
davidjohnson6 is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2013, 10:16
  #1264 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Irvine
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would also like to stress that renationalisation of Prestwick Airport is only temporary, albeit long term. The Deputy First Minister did say that it would be returned to the private sector at some point in the future. The Scottish Government is also going to be seeking a private company to manage the airport on their behalf.
Infratil put a price tag on the airport of somewhere in the region of £11 million, nowhere near £1 billion!

Last edited by james170969; 9th Oct 2013 at 10:18.
james170969 is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2013, 11:20
  #1265 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This will be a disaster. Given that market forces will not of themselves generate increased pax traffic at PIK, the Scottish Government will not be able to resist trying to meddle to increase revenue at their state owned airport, either covertly by using tax payer subsidised discounts or overtly by introducing some sort of traffic distribution rules. The only sensible option for PIK is for it to abandon pax flight and thus lose all the associated costs i.e. close the pax terminal completely and concentrate on being an mx base and maybe freight etc.
willy wombat is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2013, 11:34
  #1266 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by james170969
In this case renationalisation is the answer. Prestwick Airport was making a profit prior to being owned by Infratil and it can with the right management, make a profit again. To say that renationalisation is never the answer is just wrong. Renationalised East Coast Trains have just made £200 million for the UK Govt. The alternative was that Infratil were going to close the airport which I've no doubt would delight some people.
James, I'm theoretically open to being persuaded that perhaps this is a good move, but I think you need to find some better arguments. So what if the airport was profitable some years ago? Blackberry and Nokia were profitable some years ago. Air France was profitable some years ago. Times change. Past performance is no guide to future results.

What can a new owner (and moreover one subject to EU State Aid Guidelines) do which the existing owners can't, and which isn't just playing a zero-sum game with traffic at GLA? (Genuine question.)
Cyrano is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2013, 12:33
  #1267 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: liverpool uk
Age: 67
Posts: 1,338
Received 16 Likes on 5 Posts
As Prestwick is on the west coast, it provides an airfield that the military of many nations can use and as I have done, been through there on fixed wing aero-medical flights.
air pig is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2013, 12:38
  #1268 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only sensible option for PIK is for it to abandon pax flight and thus lose all the associated costs i.e. close the pax terminal completely and concentrate on being an mx base and maybe freight etc.
The Traffic Distribution Rules were declared illegal in 1989 at The Court of Session, I don't imagine the SNP would see any upside in tinkering. It's way too politically sensitive in Glasgow and Edinburgh. You make a good point about passenger traffic. For me, the key is getting some up front development money to put passenger traffic at a cost base where it's profitable or revenue neutral to keep working with Ryanair Remember they pay parking fees over the winter for a fair whack of their fleet and have four bays of hangar space on Apron H. However they're currently using a terminal built in the 1960s and designed around long haul traffic, something less maintenance intensive and more basic may be needed.

Knock the old cargo sheds down and put up a basic tin shed passenger terminal with access to the railway and remove the current building before it finally blows away in a winter gale.

What can a new owner (and moreover one subject to EU State Aid Guidelines) do which the existing owners can't, and which isn't just playing a zero-sum game with traffic at GLA? (Genuine question.)
The previous owners allowed costs to spiral, using the previous model of having retail and core services in house and tightly controlled is not beyond the wit of man to achieve.

Last edited by Skipness One Echo; 9th Oct 2013 at 12:40.
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2013, 13:10
  #1269 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Scotland
Age: 64
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
First piece of news following yesterday

BBC News - Aircraft scrapping firm starts up in Prestwick

As ever BBC not quite up to date - doesn't DTV now have a scrapping operation?
ScotsSLF is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2013, 16:51
  #1270 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,550
Received 89 Likes on 61 Posts
Yes - Sycamore aviation is at DTVA. Also similar operations at St Athan and Bruntingthorpe.

Last edited by SWBKCB; 9th Oct 2013 at 16:52.
SWBKCB is online now  
Old 9th Oct 2013, 18:31
  #1271 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of England
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let's assume the soon to be created Scottish Defence Force will be based at PIK, at least the air force part..

Last edited by 22 Degree Halo; 9th Oct 2013 at 18:32.
22 Degree Halo is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2013, 19:03
  #1272 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blighty
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
So there will be RSAF Lossiemouth *and* RSAF Prestwick then ?
davidjohnson6 is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2013, 19:16
  #1273 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of England
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No different from RAF Brize Norton and the numerous other RAF airfields dotted around south of the border
22 Degree Halo is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2013, 20:29
  #1274 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The M77...
Age: 41
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to the BBC, Infratil may give PIK away, full story here:

BBC News - Glasgow Prestwick Airport 'may be given away for nothing'

On a side note, where does this leave Manston?

Last edited by The Hypnoboon; 9th Oct 2013 at 20:34. Reason: had an afterthought
The Hypnoboon is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2013, 23:51
  #1275 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: France
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't worry - it's still there, tucked away safely in the south-east corner of the island.
CelticRambler is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2013, 18:10
  #1276 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The M77...
Age: 41
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can always rely on the PPrune comedians...

I think I would be safe to say that the Scottish Government has no interest in Manston, that would make it very vulnerable. But back to Prestwick, its difficult to see where the growth will come from on the passenger side. But with all the things going on around other areas of the airfield, I think there is grounds for cautious optimism.
The Hypnoboon is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2013, 19:14
  #1277 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Ayrshire
Age: 46
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The rent on the polar hangar must be worth 250grand a year?
apron alpha is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2013, 10:24
  #1278 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Prestwick
Age: 44
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would say Manston is very vulnerable - if you have studied the accounts (sorry boring I know) but a majority of losses have been incurred at Manston, whereas the majority of spending has also been done there..
Sunsetrep is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 16:07
  #1279 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: U.K.
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PIK

At the very least I hope they rename it and get rid of those stupid cartoons adorning the terminal.
And perhaps some management that are willing to put themselves out and try to attract new business and to look after what little they have at the moment.
Leatherman is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2013, 07:47
  #1280 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Ayrshire
Age: 43
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Robert Burns International Airport, Does it Make The Airport More appealing, Suppose anything is better than Pure dead Brilliant !
12-30 Wind Sock is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.