Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Excel Airways

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Sep 2008, 19:12
  #721 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2x 739s MAN to Lasham I believe.
AircraftOperations is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2008, 19:58
  #722 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Someplace where the water smells
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bye Bye AP and AR!
stue is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2008, 02:08
  #723 (permalink)  
StandupfortheUlstermen
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Peoples' Democratic Republic of Wurzelsetshire
Age: 53
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Someone is paying off some of XL's debts, the 738 at Bristol is no longer blocked in and is going to Lasham in the next day or two. Can only assume a deal has been done with the airport management. Seems the handling agent isn't happy though, from what I hear, they're refusing to push it back off stand so it's kind of still stuck here.
Standard Noise is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2008, 08:10
  #724 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looking for Kieran Kielly, ex dan ex virgin and xl, sorry about the pun. I need to contact him urgently if he was made redundant from xl, as I have a job offer for him. contact me on [email protected]
tflier is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2008, 08:56
  #725 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looking for Kieran Kielly, ex dan ex virgin and xl, sorry about the pun. I need to contact him urgently if he was made redundant from xl, as I have a job offer for him. contact me on
Ex GB as well?
Lauderdale is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2008, 09:11
  #726 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 767 in full XL livery left LGW last night about 1800hrs.....any ideas where its gone?
Gatwickba is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2008, 09:31
  #727 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EGHL with the others?
Over+Out is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2008, 09:38
  #728 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 469
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
G-VNKG left Gatwick for Toronto 17 Sep

jethro
jethro15 is online now  
Old 18th Sep 2008, 11:47
  #729 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Manchester, England
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
all the remaining xl 737's departed today, after a rep from the leasing company paid 300K to MAN Plc to have them back. Then my company refused to push them as they owed us another 150k+ in bills, finally they paid it back late last night, so we got them away earlier today, not a nice sight really.

fairwell to XL

G-STAW
G-STAW is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2008, 12:44
  #730 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: There and here
Posts: 2,863
Received 24 Likes on 17 Posts
after a rep from the leasing company paid 300K to MAN Plc to have them back. Then my company refused to push them as they owed us another 150k+ in bills, finally they paid it back late last night
Just as a matter of interest, why would the leasing company be liable for the debts incurred by XL at MAN for their impounded aircraft ? The debts would surely be arranged to be settled through PHWC, the liquidators ?

Or was it simply a case of said leasing Co wanting to cut through the red-tape and get their property back and earning revenue elsewhere asap ?


Regards


SHJ
SpringHeeledJack is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2008, 13:13
  #731 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Here, there, everywhere
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why would the leasing company be liable for the debts incurred by XL
They would probably have a claim in with the administrators for that, but its more than likely a simple case of damage limitation.

Thoughts are with all the XL crews and their families at this time
Love_joy is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2008, 14:21
  #732 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Debt stays with the aircraft, so if the leasing company wanted the plane back they would have to pay up.
Speedy123 is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2008, 14:50
  #733 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Manchester, England
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just as a matter of interest, why would the leasing company be liable for the debts incurred by XL at MAN for their impounded aircraft ? The debts would surely be arranged to be settled through PHWC, the liquidators
The lessor wanted their planes back there and then, they wasn't leaving without them. Its not they they'll liable for the debt, but they wanted their planes back, and why not?obviously the planes are now being prepared for lease with another carrier, maybe kissair?!?

also remember it would of taken alot longer for the administrators to process legal stuff and to return the planes to the lessor, than it would for the lessor to take on the debt, its just s matter of speeding the process up.

This has simplified things for the lessor, Now the lessor will chase the administartors for the now outstanding monies owed to them, this is in access of £450K.

G-STAW

Last edited by G-STAW; 18th Sep 2008 at 15:16.
G-STAW is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2008, 15:53
  #734 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: There and here
Posts: 2,863
Received 24 Likes on 17 Posts
Debt stays with the aircraft, so if the leasing company wanted the plane back they would have to pay up.
I don't doubt this, but how does something that a company 'hires' have anything to do with the company apart from a tool for the job, albeit a big and very expensive tool ?! It's not a physical liability outside of the contractual obligations of the lease wet/dry etc and belongs to someone else and hopefully legally protected from such claims.

The lessor wanted their planes back there and then, they wasn't leaving without them. Its not they they'll liable for the debt, but they wanted their planes back, and why not?obviously the planes are now being prepared for lease with another carrier, maybe kissair?!?

also remember it would of taken alot longer for the administrators to process legal stuff and to return the planes to the lessor, than it would for the lessor to take on the debt, its just s matter of speeding the process up.

This has simplified things for the lessor, Now the lessor will chase the administartors for the now outstanding monies owed to them, this is in access of £450K.
I'd have done the same, rather than have the assets sitting somewhere not bringing in revenue. Hopefully there will be some solidarity within the market sector to tell KissAir to kiss their...... I know it's business and legal, but these things are morally wrong and those with influence should use it!


Regards


SHJ
SpringHeeledJack is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2008, 07:01
  #735 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where has their 330 gone to?
dupont3700 is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2008, 09:41
  #736 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: manchester
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
XL Uk didnt have an A330 it belonged to XL France who are trading strong Seems wrong that they bought out almost bankrupt Star Airlines and rebranded to XL France........... Also german airline on its ass ..... and hey both are going strong while XL UK falls on its ass......... ironic !!!!!!
xlskyguy is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2008, 09:48
  #737 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: 2010, NSW
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
History repeats itself 1991...

Is this not very similar to the ILG/Air Europe failure in 1991...

Air Europa, and Air Europe SPA (Italy) continued, whilst the UK airline saw it's demise.
Muizenberg is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2008, 09:53
  #738 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 469
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
Where has their 330 gone to?
Returned to XL France 12 Sep

XL UK fleet status as of 19 Sep

Last edited by jethro15; 19th Sep 2008 at 19:55. Reason: Additional info
jethro15 is online now  
Old 19th Sep 2008, 09:54
  #739 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: FUBAR
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grrr

Don't know if ironic is the word I would use, manipulative bordering on fraudulent may be closer to the mark. Don't know if we will ever ( publically) know the truth, but the emergence (or not) of KissAir will be a fairly strong indication, particularly if they are using XL airframes.
As always, sh 1 tea always floats to the top.
captplaystation is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2008, 10:04
  #740 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Years ago

The debt for ground charges stayed with the reg, not the aircraft itself. Hence the rapid re-register of the airframe, to the degree of corrupting one digit. I believe, the Reg is attatched to a frame number, until cancelled by the CAA or another reg is allocated at owners re-registration?
boredcounter is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.