EXETER
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wellington
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Heya Guys,
Has anyone seen the NOTAM that went out a few days ago? Looks like they've widened taxiways A & by 10 centimeters! I wonder if they have a concrete qouta
Anyone have any ideas why they've widened it by such a small amount?
Also, if anyone is interested a very hig res aerial view of Exeter is now available on Google Earth. Quite up to date too.
Cheers,
Alex
Has anyone seen the NOTAM that went out a few days ago? Looks like they've widened taxiways A & by 10 centimeters! I wonder if they have a concrete qouta
Anyone have any ideas why they've widened it by such a small amount?
Also, if anyone is interested a very hig res aerial view of Exeter is now available on Google Earth. Quite up to date too.
Cheers,
Alex
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: EGTE / EHAM
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
a very hig res aerial view of Exeter is now available on Google Earth. Quite up to date too.
(though it looks to be circa 2002-2003).m.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: deco stop
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Security issues
Am I to understand that the aircraft was from a scheduled carrier.?
That the crew could not gain access to the aircraft.?
Does that mean that a visiting aircraft crew, would not be able to regain access to their own aircraft.?
I assume that the aircraft will continue to be charged for parking, and held to ransom by the airport operator, as the crew are prohibited access to what might be their own property.?
Why should crew be refuses airside access to their aircraft, on the basis on NO airside pass.?
Am I expected to have airside passes for every airport in the world.?
Is Exeter, being paranoid, or what.?
windy
That the crew could not gain access to the aircraft.?
Does that mean that a visiting aircraft crew, would not be able to regain access to their own aircraft.?
I assume that the aircraft will continue to be charged for parking, and held to ransom by the airport operator, as the crew are prohibited access to what might be their own property.?
Why should crew be refuses airside access to their aircraft, on the basis on NO airside pass.?
Am I expected to have airside passes for every airport in the world.?
Is Exeter, being paranoid, or what.?
windy
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Isle Du Cyber
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Security Issues
Itswindyout
I think the answer to this one is, Flybe has a Fokker 100 on lease from Trade Air of Croatia.
It looks like that with the Crews being based at Exeter for a period of time and not transiting through, they require Local I.D passes for Exeter Airport this would not only apply to Exeter if you are on a secondment for a period of time you will require to hold a new I.D.for the temp base you are at.
I think the answer to this one is, Flybe has a Fokker 100 on lease from Trade Air of Croatia.
It looks like that with the Crews being based at Exeter for a period of time and not transiting through, they require Local I.D passes for Exeter Airport this would not only apply to Exeter if you are on a secondment for a period of time you will require to hold a new I.D.for the temp base you are at.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wellington
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Heya
One of the Exeter Flying Club aircraft have been taken out of use due to damage caused by a broken drain on the southside disused! All the GA has been moved onto the disused due to waterlogged grass.
I've heard various rumours of EZY considering Exeter again once RYR move to their new permenant base at BRS however I see this as unlikely.
I've also heard that Balfour is considering a 500m runway extension and a full length taxiway. I don't see the need for the runway extension however, the full length taxiway would be very useful!
It looks like Balfour are cracking on with things though now, the terminal looks a bit cleaner on the inside now and the new airside/landside arrangement for the passengers is brilliant.
Now all they need to do is working on brining in the airlines except baby blue. Hopefully when FCA moves in full time in November they might prove that it's safe!
Alex
One of the Exeter Flying Club aircraft have been taken out of use due to damage caused by a broken drain on the southside disused! All the GA has been moved onto the disused due to waterlogged grass.
I've heard various rumours of EZY considering Exeter again once RYR move to their new permenant base at BRS however I see this as unlikely.
I've also heard that Balfour is considering a 500m runway extension and a full length taxiway. I don't see the need for the runway extension however, the full length taxiway would be very useful!
It looks like Balfour are cracking on with things though now, the terminal looks a bit cleaner on the inside now and the new airside/landside arrangement for the passengers is brilliant.
Now all they need to do is working on brining in the airlines except baby blue. Hopefully when FCA moves in full time in November they might prove that it's safe!
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SE England
Age: 70
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The starter extension would make the runway uable for more heavily loaded aircaft to use the airport. One year the plane I was on going to Teneriffe had to stop at Faro to take on fuel.
The other problem with Exeter is that they have now cut off the restaurant/bar/viewing area by a new wall, so they are now airside. You need to be a passenger to get to them - this has p**d off many visitors
The other problem with Exeter is that they have now cut off the restaurant/bar/viewing area by a new wall, so they are now airside. You need to be a passenger to get to them - this has p**d off many visitors
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any runway extension is welcome, however don't think that it solves all the problems.
For rwy 26 it would be fine, but rwy 08 would still be limited due to the hill by the junction to Ottery on the A30 (climb out gradient restrictions, etc). Operating A320's out of EXT in the winter to Tenerife, if the runway in use was 08 and we had a full load, we were close to the limits. It would be worse in summer; I never did it so I can't say how bad it would be, but I'd guess it would be significant on a really hot day. Extending at the 26 threshold doesnt help therefore and extending west from the present 08 threshold would be difficult (and expensive) due to the terrain and the small matter of Clyst Honiton.
On most days, big aircraft will opt for 26 with a tailwind. However if the tailwind component is above 10 kts, most (if not all) aircraft will have to use 08 with the corresponding reduction in take-off weight and hence range.
For rwy 26 it would be fine, but rwy 08 would still be limited due to the hill by the junction to Ottery on the A30 (climb out gradient restrictions, etc). Operating A320's out of EXT in the winter to Tenerife, if the runway in use was 08 and we had a full load, we were close to the limits. It would be worse in summer; I never did it so I can't say how bad it would be, but I'd guess it would be significant on a really hot day. Extending at the 26 threshold doesnt help therefore and extending west from the present 08 threshold would be difficult (and expensive) due to the terrain and the small matter of Clyst Honiton.
On most days, big aircraft will opt for 26 with a tailwind. However if the tailwind component is above 10 kts, most (if not all) aircraft will have to use 08 with the corresponding reduction in take-off weight and hence range.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wellington
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Heya,
For the current uses of the airfield, I do not see the immediate need for an extension, AFAIK there are no performance limitations which would affect the airfield at the moment.
What I think they really need to look at is the taxiways & apron areas. They are dodgy at best. Whatever new stands we get will be good news and hopefully relieve some of the PPR requirements that are very strict at Exeter.
A full lenght taxiway would be nice too, would increase the number of movements possible.
With the new stands, and the removal of the grass apron, all GA is being moved northside which is good as it no longer requires them crossing the runway at C to taxi down F.
For the current uses of the airfield, I do not see the immediate need for an extension, AFAIK there are no performance limitations which would affect the airfield at the moment.
What I think they really need to look at is the taxiways & apron areas. They are dodgy at best. Whatever new stands we get will be good news and hopefully relieve some of the PPR requirements that are very strict at Exeter.
A full lenght taxiway would be nice too, would increase the number of movements possible.
With the new stands, and the removal of the grass apron, all GA is being moved northside which is good as it no longer requires them crossing the runway at C to taxi down F.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: sw uk
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dodgy at best????
This seems a bit strong. Yes more space and improved facilities would be nice but as a regional airport handling 1,000,000 pax p.a. things can't be that bad. The guys and gals there deserve praise
. Changes seem to be happening in relatively short time.
Every time I have used the airport it has always been an enjoyable experience.
This seems a bit strong. Yes more space and improved facilities would be nice but as a regional airport handling 1,000,000 pax p.a. things can't be that bad. The guys and gals there deserve praise
. Changes seem to be happening in relatively short time. Every time I have used the airport it has always been an enjoyable experience
.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wellington
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Heya,
I wasn't insulting the safety or quality of the infrastructure just it isn't exactly ideal for a growing international airport.
They've done an amazing job with what they've got and now they've got some support behind them they should be able to crack on and get things sorted.
I wasn't insulting the safety or quality of the infrastructure just it isn't exactly ideal for a growing international airport.
They've done an amazing job with what they've got and now they've got some support behind them they should be able to crack on and get things sorted.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wellington
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ref: C3154/07
FIR: EGTT
Code: FALT
Traffic: VFR IFR
Purpose: Immed. atten. aircraft operators PIB entry Operationally significant for flights
Scope: Aerodrome
Lower limit (FL): 000
Upper limit (FL): 999
Centre and radius (nm): 5044N00325W005
Parent ICAO: EGTE
Start date/time: 14/07/2007 23:00 UTC
End date/time: 15/07/2007 06:00 UTC
Activity period: null
Lower height limit: 000
Upper height limit: 999
NO DIVERSIONS OR EXTENSION OF HOURS DUE WIP
Looks like some lamps have failed lol!
FIR: EGTT
Code: FALT
Traffic: VFR IFR
Purpose: Immed. atten. aircraft operators PIB entry Operationally significant for flights
Scope: Aerodrome
Lower limit (FL): 000
Upper limit (FL): 999
Centre and radius (nm): 5044N00325W005
Parent ICAO: EGTE
Start date/time: 14/07/2007 23:00 UTC
End date/time: 15/07/2007 06:00 UTC
Activity period: null
Lower height limit: 000
Upper height limit: 999
NO DIVERSIONS OR EXTENSION OF HOURS DUE WIP
Looks like some lamps have failed lol!
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Devon
Age: 45
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well FCA ever put a premier class type thing on their short haul flights again? I always thought it was popular when they did it until last year.
http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=247522&page=5&highlight=first+choice
http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=247522&page=5&highlight=first+choice
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BRISTOL
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FCA have Prem on their 321's but its nothing like the long haul FCA prem.
Also they only have 3 x 321's left in the fleet, my guess would be that these will go as soon as the leases are up, they're currently based 1 x lgw, 1 x stn and 1 x ema.
BRS used to be a 321 base with 2 of them until nov 06.
Also they only have 3 x 321's left in the fleet, my guess would be that these will go as soon as the leases are up, they're currently based 1 x lgw, 1 x stn and 1 x ema.
BRS used to be a 321 base with 2 of them until nov 06.