Jet2 B757's.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jet2 B757's.
According to a friend who flies for Jet2, the company announced yesterday it has secured two 757's to operate flights to the popular holiday destinations including the Canaries. He believes they are destined for Leeds but was unsure.
Anyone have any more details?
Anyone have any more details?
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: northwest
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes it was anounced yesterday but no news yet on where they are coming from . . . .some say MYT and some say they have been parked up in arizona for a while!! most probably doing the LBA-TFS to start, the second one rumoured to be MAN based next spring.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Either the back of a sim, or wherever Crewing send me.
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Since when did B757's have winglets? OK some smarty pants will probably find one somewhere in the world, but I'll bet it won't get into LBA on a windy day. The Jet2 757's are going to LBA, starting in Oct for the TFS and AGP routes.
Not Manchester
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Salford
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Since when did B757's have winglets?
Icelandair will also be doing the same to their -200s.
Brunel to Concorde
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Virtute et Industria, et Sumorsaete Ealle
Posts: 2,283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There have been endless arguments on Bristol Airport threads as to whether the CO 757s to be used on the BRS-EWR service (starts a week today) will be able to regularly fly non stop from the BRS runway.
CO and the BRS management are adamant that they will be able to do so under all conditions because the aircraft to be used will be the 757s with winglets.
LBA and BRS are pretty similar I believe in having limited runways, dodgy weather and the two highest airports in England (if not in the entire UK), so if CO are right about their wingletted 757s making EWR from BRS presumably Jet 2 757s ought to be able to make TFS from LBA, although the CO 757s only have 172 seats.
CO and the BRS management are adamant that they will be able to do so under all conditions because the aircraft to be used will be the 757s with winglets.
LBA and BRS are pretty similar I believe in having limited runways, dodgy weather and the two highest airports in England (if not in the entire UK), so if CO are right about their wingletted 757s making EWR from BRS presumably Jet 2 757s ought to be able to make TFS from LBA, although the CO 757s only have 172 seats.
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 6 miles 14
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yup, 757 no problem to TFS. It's the 733s that'll struggle in certain conditions ex LBA. Maybe thats why they're looking at the 757s, or maybe it's because they're filling 3 x 733s to AGP a day this summer. Wonder if it's ERs they're getting? Now LBA to Torronto and New York would be good!
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: northwest
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i think someone has been a bit handy with an airbrush on the above photo, because it was knocking around with a 777 in jet2 colours a while ago! i think all ex air europe a/c had 'doors 3' and not the over wing hatches! anyway we shall see haha!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South of the River
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Piccies.....
A little bird tells me these are the beasts involved.....
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/580304/L/
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/546210/L/
fyi N136CV was delivered to Air Holland as PHAHF and N241CV was deliverd to Air Europe as G-BNSE.
I really should get out more ...
May the farce be with you...
Daft Wader
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/580304/L/
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/546210/L/
fyi N136CV was delivered to Air Holland as PHAHF and N241CV was deliverd to Air Europe as G-BNSE.
I really should get out more ...
May the farce be with you...
Daft Wader
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At least some of the ex AE machines were ER versions. AE often operated them to Florida.
An ER 757 is not required to operate UK to TFS. The old LTE 757's were non-ER versions and regularly operated GLA-TFS non stop.
An ER 757 is not required to operate UK to TFS. The old LTE 757's were non-ER versions and regularly operated GLA-TFS non stop.
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Blairgowrie,Scotland
Age: 75
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
N241CV was deliverd to Air Europe as G-BNSE.
Neither seems to be an ER version, both built in 1988,and have been stored for a year.
I'm going to get out now!
Skyliner says they're not for delivery until October,anybody know the reason?
Last edited by Oshkosh George; 14th May 2005 at 13:44.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Doesnt the extended rear engine cowling suggest that they are indeed ER versions ?
"Skyliner says they're not for delivery until October,anybody know the reason? "
So they can be painted in EZY colours......
"Skyliner says they're not for delivery until October,anybody know the reason? "
So they can be painted in EZY colours......
Interesting. Both of those aircraft were, I think, last operated by a Turkish airline (was it FlyAir?) which left massive outstanding Eurocontrol debts on them, and the lessor (I think it was Sunrock) was not at all keen to place them back in Europe because it would have to clear those debts. Hope Jet2 have taken note of that if indeed those are the aircraft that they are taking. There were also some engine overhaul issues on both machines.
Just to be pedantic, there is no such thing as a 757ER. There are heavy gross weight and low gross weight 757s and 757s (of both weight categories) which are ETOPS and non-ETOPS approved. However, there has never been a formal designation of a 757ER. There is absolutely no guarantee that these two aircraft would be ETOPS-equipped or capable, even if they have been ETOPS in the past, since the aircraft needs to be maintained to ETOPS levels if it is to retain its ETOPS capability.
Just to be pedantic, there is no such thing as a 757ER. There are heavy gross weight and low gross weight 757s and 757s (of both weight categories) which are ETOPS and non-ETOPS approved. However, there has never been a formal designation of a 757ER. There is absolutely no guarantee that these two aircraft would be ETOPS-equipped or capable, even if they have been ETOPS in the past, since the aircraft needs to be maintained to ETOPS levels if it is to retain its ETOPS capability.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes Im well aware of that ,it was tongue and cheek, because previous rumours have hinted at perhaps EZY being interested in LS, and EZY have a "big announcement in June"
Sorry folks, I must have been mistaken but heres the source I took my info from.
From the Boeing 757 enthusiasts site
http://www.757.org.uk/phist/
Although not a true "Extended Range" version of the aircraft, the 757-200(ER) first flew on 8th April 1986 and was delivered to Royal Brunei on 6th May 1986. The ER aircraft is certified to a higher gross takeoff weight, but does not feature additional fuel tank capacity (which is strictly speaking normally a feature of an ER variant).
http://www.boeing.com/commercial/757...f_200back.html
the 757 is available with extended range features, including a backup hydraulic-motor generator and an auxiliary fan to cool equipment in the electronics bay. High-gross-weight versions of the aircraft can fly 4,500 statute miles (7,240 kilometers) nonstop with full passenger payload. These system attributes contribute to the 757's versatility, allowing it to serve more markets.
Im looking at a list of the Britannia/Thom fleet provided by the airline and 14 of their 757's are designated "ER" versions.
Sorry folks, I must have been mistaken but heres the source I took my info from.
From the Boeing 757 enthusiasts site
http://www.757.org.uk/phist/
Although not a true "Extended Range" version of the aircraft, the 757-200(ER) first flew on 8th April 1986 and was delivered to Royal Brunei on 6th May 1986. The ER aircraft is certified to a higher gross takeoff weight, but does not feature additional fuel tank capacity (which is strictly speaking normally a feature of an ER variant).
http://www.boeing.com/commercial/757...f_200back.html
the 757 is available with extended range features, including a backup hydraulic-motor generator and an auxiliary fan to cool equipment in the electronics bay. High-gross-weight versions of the aircraft can fly 4,500 statute miles (7,240 kilometers) nonstop with full passenger payload. These system attributes contribute to the 757's versatility, allowing it to serve more markets.
Im looking at a list of the Britannia/Thom fleet provided by the airline and 14 of their 757's are designated "ER" versions.
Last edited by GW76; 14th May 2005 at 20:03.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Leeds
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The LBA-TFS service starts in October so probably no need to bring them in until then maybe?
also, its been said that Phillip Meeson would not take the 757 due to costs, if winglets were fitted then the cost of fuel would be reduced, would be great to have wingletted 75's of jet2 at LBA.
also, its been said that Phillip Meeson would not take the 757 due to costs, if winglets were fitted then the cost of fuel would be reduced, would be great to have wingletted 75's of jet2 at LBA.