Interesting post V1.

As usual the majority of accidents caused by the nut on the end of the contol yoke.

V1... Ooops
Thank you for a very informative reply.

I trust that this now puts the argument about legitimate LETs and the other cowboys in the right perspective. LET's not hear the trotting out and dusting off of old worn-out cliché’s, untruths and downright lies, as espoused by the Otter drivers every time the LET is mentioned.

Soap Box Cowboy
Thanks for the topic................... see you in Hyde Park?
Cheers

I posted some additional information related to the history of Twin Otter accidents on this post, in response to a question that was raised there: http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthr...hreadid=186105

Looks like Otter driversput tail between legs and fled.

So, Otter superior aircraft,Myth.......................busted!!!!!

Nope!

Just couldn't be bothered responding to your uninformed drivel.....

There's only one plane that can replace a Twotter,,,- another Twotter, sava!

I understand that the LET is available with two different engines on it - the original fitment, and a PWC engine. Is there a significant difference in performance - in particular, single engine performance - between the two? Did the manufacturer publish different performance data (takeoff run, rate of climb, SE climb, etc.) for the PWC engine when it was offered later on?

Michael