Is aviation in Africa really unsafe?
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: slightly right of the MCP
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh you think Caco, after generations of colonialism what did it achieve in terms of advancing the continent rather than developing the west with plundered resources from Africa, no one is blaming the west for poor governance in Africa but we know that post independence African leadership was largely influenced by their former colonizers, why do you think Patrice Lumumba was assasinated with the help of the belgians, most recently another blood thirsty dictator installed with the help of the french to replace another dictator in Ivory coast, Colonialism is still on fellaz so stop displaying your ignorance on history and world politics on this thread, the only thing the west has ever cared about is having leaders who toe the line in the continent so they can keep plundering, and the concern of China as an entrant into Africa is not because the west cares about the people of the continent but rather the grip they are loosing on the continents resources, we understand how ruthless the Chinese can be but at least instead of enslaving us in debt they take whatever they come for and in return they put up infrastructure. You think Europe developed overnight they had their wars even America went through civil war at least then there was less interference from "globalization". Capetonian speaks of children born after 1990 as not being disadvantaged, if my math is right they are just turning 21 hardly out of college that is if they even got a chance to attend one, oh! remember their parents are pre 90's the so called disadvantaged most likely semi illiterate. Then come the post 90's and the said country transitions from apartheid to democracy with the majority being from the "disadvantaged semi literate" now tasked with running a country and an advanced economy with little or no formal education, and you wonder why you have the "Malemas" now in positions of power.
DRPAM007, sorry this isnt suppose to degenerate to where it has, it should have been a sober minded discussion on the cons in terms of safety in the continent and what can be done to make it better, but the people who are always making bigoted comments and immediately jumping on the defence before anyone accuses them are not helping the course of this thread, unless thats the kind of contribution you were looking for in the first place
DRPAM007, sorry this isnt suppose to degenerate to where it has, it should have been a sober minded discussion on the cons in terms of safety in the continent and what can be done to make it better, but the people who are always making bigoted comments and immediately jumping on the defence before anyone accuses them are not helping the course of this thread, unless thats the kind of contribution you were looking for in the first place
Join Date: May 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 62
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Things Fall Apart...
Oh you think Caco, after generations of colonialism what did it achieve in terms of advancing the continent rather than developing the west with plundered resources from Africa
You seem to have completely misunderstood me (or have I misunderstood you)? I am no supporter of colonialism. My points say so explicitly...
."do much to set the cause of African aviation safety back" (i.e. it would be a bad thing).
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: slightly right of the MCP
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did not say the black populace in SA or Zimbabwe are any better, what i implied was the transition from apartheid to democracy was poorly done there should have been ample time to make sure country was being handed to capable people, in the case of zimbabwe read what i said the west doesn't care as long as you toe their line, why are zimbabwean diamonds being sold in britain and its common knowledge the mines are owned by BOB, yet the same britain is on the fore front to criticize him for mistreating his citizenry and evicting the white farmers, as long as they benefit f&$k all else.
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: slightly right of the MCP
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
@ Caco.
Sorry for misunderstanding your previous post, just wish this thread could stay on track in terms of whats ailing the industry and if the institutions managing the sector in the continent could be strengthened to improve safety
Sorry for misunderstanding your previous post, just wish this thread could stay on track in terms of whats ailing the industry and if the institutions managing the sector in the continent could be strengthened to improve safety
Join Date: May 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 62
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
just wish this thread could stay on track in terms of whats ailing the industries and if the institutions managing the sector in the continent could be strengthened to improve safety
Join Date: May 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 62
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On the subject of SA, there are plenty of capable and educated people of all races. Sadly there is also a huge population of mostly capable people who have been ill educated or not educated all. The apartheid era is still much to blame for that although the current government has not contributed positively to improving that situation unfortunately.
As for blacks being better off under apartheid Capetonian I would say that I find that notion disingenuous but I suspect that you actually do believe what you say so I won't.
Let's just say I beg to differ.
As for blacks being better off under apartheid Capetonian I would say that I find that notion disingenuous but I suspect that you actually do believe what you say so I won't.
Let's just say I beg to differ.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Far, far away.....
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A breath of Fresh air......
Odericko2000,
You're quite right as to the objective of the thread, but as you've noticed there seem to be some continous moderate distraction that tends to steer the discourse off course. But every noble course must expect some sort of resistance. The idea is to get input from those who truly want to see improvements in Aviation safety in Africa. I expect Africans of all shades or creed will be interested in such a venture, primary because it is their home.
There's been a good number of balanced, thought provoking and positive contributions from some great individuals on the subject. However, it's still early days and I'm still hoping for more input from African aviators.
The salvation of Africa does not lie in the goodwill from the donor nations. That goodwill began an ended with missionaries in the 18th century. Nowadays most charities are controlled by government handlers and protocol.
Government aids and Grants are for all intents and purposes "Government baits and gags". Foreign governments, businesses, e.t.c are only intent on fostering and protecting their "permanent interests" which is to maintain their " competitive advantage over Africa."in other words, plunder, control dominate, etc. We await the arrival of the next stooge in Libya and the return of the European oil companies to the negotiate contracts of 2009 between Blair and Ghaddafi.
Lets hope We Africans recognize it.
Sadly, that's how international politics and diplomacy works.
Ps
Why do I have this nagging feeling that with the proliferation of nuclear energy in electrical power generation, our generous donor nations have not covertly hatched a plan to use some parts of Africa as a dumping ground for the "high
Level radioactive waste" that is a bye product of the industry? I recall the environmentalist disapproved of France's underground storage facility and the French said it was an interim measure. So, what is the "final solution"?
DRPAM007, sorry this isnt suppose to degenerate to where it has, it should have been a sober minded discussion on the cons in terms of safety in the continent and what can be done to make it better,
There's been a good number of balanced, thought provoking and positive contributions from some great individuals on the subject. However, it's still early days and I'm still hoping for more input from African aviators.
The salvation of Africa does not lie in the goodwill from the donor nations. That goodwill began an ended with missionaries in the 18th century. Nowadays most charities are controlled by government handlers and protocol.
Government aids and Grants are for all intents and purposes "Government baits and gags". Foreign governments, businesses, e.t.c are only intent on fostering and protecting their "permanent interests" which is to maintain their " competitive advantage over Africa."in other words, plunder, control dominate, etc. We await the arrival of the next stooge in Libya and the return of the European oil companies to the negotiate contracts of 2009 between Blair and Ghaddafi.
Lets hope We Africans recognize it.
Sadly, that's how international politics and diplomacy works.
Ps
Why do I have this nagging feeling that with the proliferation of nuclear energy in electrical power generation, our generous donor nations have not covertly hatched a plan to use some parts of Africa as a dumping ground for the "high
Level radioactive waste" that is a bye product of the industry? I recall the environmentalist disapproved of France's underground storage facility and the French said it was an interim measure. So, what is the "final solution"?
Last edited by DRPAM007; 27th Aug 2011 at 02:48.
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In transit
Age: 70
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As for blacks being better off under apartheid Capetonian I would say that I find that notion disingenuous but I suspect that you actually do believe what you say so I won't.
Read this and see what's going on north of the Limpopo. Things were never that way under Ian Smith's so-called 'racist' regime, but the entire world bleated and eventually succeeded in bringing down his government and seeing it replaced by the monstrous Mugabe regime. I appreciate that Mugabe is amongst the worst of African leaders, but there is a common thread of despotic megalomania which characterises many of them and the way their people are treated. Swaziland is another example. There is only one country in the region which is stable, relatively prosperous, and more or less democratic. The rest are a bleeding mess.
A collapse of the national electricity grid on Wednesday plunged most of the country into the dark. That night the clatter of generators rang out from every direction; the noise was deafening and the air vibrated! ZBC TV called for people to switch off their geysers and lights to save electricity. What electricity, we all shouted, as we watched battery powered TV’s, because there was no electricity to save.
Calls to the local electricity supply office resulted in a variety of reasons for what very rapidly degenerated into rolling 18 hour a day power cuts. We were told that the hydro electricity generators at Kariba Dam were being maintained, then that the thermal units at Hwange weren’t working and finally, the clearest of all reasons given was that there just wasn’t enough electricity in the country. An article in the press later in the week quoted a Zesa spokesman as saying there was “an unstable grid, resulting in the disconnection of inter connectors.’ The article spoke about a two
hour national blackout but in many places it seems the inter connectors are still disconnected because we are still in the dark!
The power cut continued for the next three days. Lights flickered on between 11pm and midnight and went off again a few hours later, long before sunrise. If you are lucky it flicks on for an hour or two in the afternoon but don’t bank on it! Coping with five hours of electricity a day, and then only in the middle of the night, is gruelling. We had got used to this a couple of years ago when daily extended power cuts were the norm but it comes as a shocker this time round when many of us are woefully unprepared.
You can hardly hear yourself think, let alone hold a conversation with anyone as you walk around town, negotiating the smoking, roaring generators that clutter the pavements. Everywhere except the government buildings that is, where the norm is, as always, no change. Outside the passport office people are ordered to queue on the other side of the road providing a deadly hazard for drivers when suddenly a score or more surge across the road, running to be allowed in the gatein small batches. At the Post Office where civil servants and pensioners get their monthly payments, it is utter mayhem which is embarrassing and shameful to witness. With nowhere to sit or shelter, hundreds crowd the car park, pavements and road, standing for hours at a time in the full sun waiting to get their meagre salaries or even more meagre pensions. Payments seem to be dependent on electricity to power computers and people wait without apology or explanation from
officials within.
To all this mayhem add no water. No electricity means no water can be pumped and for three days my home town has been bone dry. Not a drop in any tap, sink or toilet. Everywhere we go we apologise to people for smelling and at every stream and shallow well, crowds of women scoop water out into containers to carry home. A borehole has been sunk in the town’s green, a small park which used to have pretty gardens, lawns and benches. Now lines of people wait their turn to get to the hand pump and draw a few litres of water to carry home. The lawns have turned to dust and the plastic water containers are piled up where once the flower beds were. When you have to physically carry every litre of water that you need, everything takes on a very different perspective.
Hard to believe that life is still like this, two and a half years into our so called unity government. Even harder to explain to outsiders who say: but everything’s OK in Zimbabwe now isn’t it?
Far from it and after a bad week it seemed inevitable that something daft would happen and it did, on Friday. An announcement came from Zesa – the electricity supplier with no electricity to supply. They said that tariffs are to increase by 31% from the 1st of September.
Pay more for less must be their new slogan.
for reading, love cathy Copyright � Cathy Buckle. 27 August 2011.
*Cathy Buckle News from Zimbabwe <http://www.cathybuckle.com/>
Calls to the local electricity supply office resulted in a variety of reasons for what very rapidly degenerated into rolling 18 hour a day power cuts. We were told that the hydro electricity generators at Kariba Dam were being maintained, then that the thermal units at Hwange weren’t working and finally, the clearest of all reasons given was that there just wasn’t enough electricity in the country. An article in the press later in the week quoted a Zesa spokesman as saying there was “an unstable grid, resulting in the disconnection of inter connectors.’ The article spoke about a two
hour national blackout but in many places it seems the inter connectors are still disconnected because we are still in the dark!
The power cut continued for the next three days. Lights flickered on between 11pm and midnight and went off again a few hours later, long before sunrise. If you are lucky it flicks on for an hour or two in the afternoon but don’t bank on it! Coping with five hours of electricity a day, and then only in the middle of the night, is gruelling. We had got used to this a couple of years ago when daily extended power cuts were the norm but it comes as a shocker this time round when many of us are woefully unprepared.
You can hardly hear yourself think, let alone hold a conversation with anyone as you walk around town, negotiating the smoking, roaring generators that clutter the pavements. Everywhere except the government buildings that is, where the norm is, as always, no change. Outside the passport office people are ordered to queue on the other side of the road providing a deadly hazard for drivers when suddenly a score or more surge across the road, running to be allowed in the gatein small batches. At the Post Office where civil servants and pensioners get their monthly payments, it is utter mayhem which is embarrassing and shameful to witness. With nowhere to sit or shelter, hundreds crowd the car park, pavements and road, standing for hours at a time in the full sun waiting to get their meagre salaries or even more meagre pensions. Payments seem to be dependent on electricity to power computers and people wait without apology or explanation from
officials within.
To all this mayhem add no water. No electricity means no water can be pumped and for three days my home town has been bone dry. Not a drop in any tap, sink or toilet. Everywhere we go we apologise to people for smelling and at every stream and shallow well, crowds of women scoop water out into containers to carry home. A borehole has been sunk in the town’s green, a small park which used to have pretty gardens, lawns and benches. Now lines of people wait their turn to get to the hand pump and draw a few litres of water to carry home. The lawns have turned to dust and the plastic water containers are piled up where once the flower beds were. When you have to physically carry every litre of water that you need, everything takes on a very different perspective.
Hard to believe that life is still like this, two and a half years into our so called unity government. Even harder to explain to outsiders who say: but everything’s OK in Zimbabwe now isn’t it?
Far from it and after a bad week it seemed inevitable that something daft would happen and it did, on Friday. An announcement came from Zesa – the electricity supplier with no electricity to supply. They said that tariffs are to increase by 31% from the 1st of September.
Pay more for less must be their new slogan.
for reading, love cathy Copyright � Cathy Buckle. 27 August 2011.
*Cathy Buckle News from Zimbabwe <http://www.cathybuckle.com/>
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Far, far away.....
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Capetonian,
You must be seriously trying to insult the collective intelligence or even "mediocrity" of Black Africans if you're insinuating that they'll rather remain oppressed, dehumanised and branded inferior humans in their own native land by racist invaders as long as they have uninterruptible electric power supply.
Do you have an idea of what it means to be a "black father" with your own family; wife and children under apartheid or Ian Smiths Rhodesia?
Are you just gloating over their current misfortune or you're being delusional.
You must be seriously trying to insult the collective intelligence or even "mediocrity" of Black Africans if you're insinuating that they'll rather remain oppressed, dehumanised and branded inferior humans in their own native land by racist invaders as long as they have uninterruptible electric power supply.
Do you have an idea of what it means to be a "black father" with your own family; wife and children under apartheid or Ian Smiths Rhodesia?
Are you just gloating over their current misfortune or you're being delusional.
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In transit
Age: 70
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DRPAM007 :This is not really the place for the discussion, it would be better transferred to South African politics. Also I am writing this in haste as I have to go out shortly.
I am insulting, and deliberately so , the so-called leaders of the 'great new democracies' in Africa, for what they are, a bunch of murdering, merciless, mercenary thugs who set the worst possible example to their people. As for the people, they are more oppressed than ever before, and at least in the case of SA, the mechanism that calls itself a government, is deliberately keeping them uneducated. Uneducated does not equal stupid, and I have never implied that they are stupid.
Are you black, and if so, did you ever live in SA or Rhodesia as "oppressed, dehumanised and branded inferior humans in their own native land by racist invaders"? If you did, I might have more respect for your opinions. Do you have any first hand knowledge of life under those regimes, or are you simply regurgitating the claptrap of the Peter Hains and the left wing press?
'Racist' by the way is an epithet more applicable to most black African 'leaders' than to most whites.
I am insulting, and deliberately so , the so-called leaders of the 'great new democracies' in Africa, for what they are, a bunch of murdering, merciless, mercenary thugs who set the worst possible example to their people. As for the people, they are more oppressed than ever before, and at least in the case of SA, the mechanism that calls itself a government, is deliberately keeping them uneducated. Uneducated does not equal stupid, and I have never implied that they are stupid.
Are you black, and if so, did you ever live in SA or Rhodesia as "oppressed, dehumanised and branded inferior humans in their own native land by racist invaders"? If you did, I might have more respect for your opinions. Do you have any first hand knowledge of life under those regimes, or are you simply regurgitating the claptrap of the Peter Hains and the left wing press?
'Racist' by the way is an epithet more applicable to most black African 'leaders' than to most whites.
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The wrong side of town.
Posts: 193
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DRPAM007
Moving back, if I may, to the original subject of this thread, I think the overwhelming theme is that it is pointless to try an improve aviation safety in Africa when things on the ground are still chaotic.
Aviation in any region is an integral part of the socio/political/economic system and untill such time as those systems are funtional the air safety factor will be non or semi functional at best.
The solution therefore is to get the useless fekkers who currently (miss)rule large swathes of the African continent, out of power, replace them with people who are competant and honest, and then we can all move forward from there. Untill such time as this happens you may as well be p1ssing into the sea for all that your efforts will achieve.
You are clearly passionate in your ambition to do something about flying saftey in Africa, which is noble of you indeed.
In this regard, there are over 800 airfileds throughout Sudan , less than 100 of them have windsocks. There is a container load of brand new donor sponsored windsocks ( about a thousand) languishing in a UN/Red Cross shipping container in Port Sudan where it has been impounded for the past 15 years. No amount of political wrangling has been able to get this container released.
Why dont you take this on as a project and if you are succesfull in getting these windsocks released and distributed, you would have improved aviation safety in Sudan by 800 percent.
I know its not a grand project but it is something that is realistic with definable aims, and it will definately make aviation in Africa safer.
Moving back, if I may, to the original subject of this thread, I think the overwhelming theme is that it is pointless to try an improve aviation safety in Africa when things on the ground are still chaotic.
Aviation in any region is an integral part of the socio/political/economic system and untill such time as those systems are funtional the air safety factor will be non or semi functional at best.
The solution therefore is to get the useless fekkers who currently (miss)rule large swathes of the African continent, out of power, replace them with people who are competant and honest, and then we can all move forward from there. Untill such time as this happens you may as well be p1ssing into the sea for all that your efforts will achieve.
You are clearly passionate in your ambition to do something about flying saftey in Africa, which is noble of you indeed.
In this regard, there are over 800 airfileds throughout Sudan , less than 100 of them have windsocks. There is a container load of brand new donor sponsored windsocks ( about a thousand) languishing in a UN/Red Cross shipping container in Port Sudan where it has been impounded for the past 15 years. No amount of political wrangling has been able to get this container released.
Why dont you take this on as a project and if you are succesfull in getting these windsocks released and distributed, you would have improved aviation safety in Sudan by 800 percent.
I know its not a grand project but it is something that is realistic with definable aims, and it will definately make aviation in Africa safer.
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Motel 6, or the Super 8
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Please read
So some you can sound, enlightened....
Read this book by a black African woman about the topics you post about. Not aviation related.
Dead Aid - Dambisa Moyo
Read this book by a black African woman about the topics you post about. Not aviation related.
Dead Aid - Dambisa Moyo
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In transit
Age: 70
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Definitely worth reading. Moyo, who is from Zambia, a nation which has received substantial amounts of aid since 'indepedence', explains why aid for Africa has been a disaster, causing death and misery and poverty in the recipient countries, how aid is malignant and encourages corruption.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Far, far away.....
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maxrated"
You're obviously quite knowledgeable and intelligent. However, I was expecting something more poignant from you than installing 800 windsocks 15 year old in Sudan?
( the centre of commercial aviation in Africa). Is that to make it safer for the drug and arms dealers that spread conflict in the region?
How about transfer of technical skills rather than windsocks? I try never to look a gift horse in the mouth, unless of course it is a Greek gift.
A subtle difference between the "aid" we need and the "bait" we get. African does not need money thrown at it once in a while. The money which ends up in the banks of the donor nations. If we need anything from the international community, it is honest, fair and open partnerships!
I guess those windsocks were donated as aid and all the container had in it were "wind socks".
In this regard, there are over 800 airfileds throughout Sudan , less than 100 of them have windsocks. There is a container load of brand new donor sponsored windsocks ( about a thousand) languishing in a UN/Red Cross shipping container in Port Sudan where it has been impounded for the past 15 years. No amount of political wrangling has been able to get this container released.
( the centre of commercial aviation in Africa). Is that to make it safer for the drug and arms dealers that spread conflict in the region?
How about transfer of technical skills rather than windsocks? I try never to look a gift horse in the mouth, unless of course it is a Greek gift.
A subtle difference between the "aid" we need and the "bait" we get. African does not need money thrown at it once in a while. The money which ends up in the banks of the donor nations. If we need anything from the international community, it is honest, fair and open partnerships!
I guess those windsocks were donated as aid and all the container had in it were "wind socks".
Last edited by DRPAM007; 28th Aug 2011 at 18:27.
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The wrong side of town.
Posts: 193
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You're obviously quite knowledgeable and intelligent
I was expecting something more poignant from you than installing 800 windsocks 15 year old in Sudan?
I put it to you that YOU were expecting something more poignant for YOU.
I appologise that my suggestion was not grandiose enough for you in which case please could you arrange EU funding and tech support for SSR radar controll from Cape To Cairo by the end of next year, there's a good chap... let us know when you are done....
Most foreigners/aid workers in Africa are looking for 'Glory' projects which will make them look good on their resume's, when the basics need to be adressed first.
Admittedly the windsock project isnt grandiose enough for you but one should remember that it doesnt help to try something massive like installing SSR radar controll from Cape to Cairo (would be nice though) when there's no electricity in Zimbabwe to power the runway lights of Harare, or the jet fuel in Kinshasa is always contaminated or the ATC's in Luanda fall asleep on the job every now and then, or the Zambian Airforce extorts money from tourist charters into that country or the Russian cargo crews over Africa dont talk on the assigned radio frequencies and dont observe semi circular altitude rules or the fire engines in Khartoum Airport have no water or chems in them or pilots of aid aircraft continue to be kidnapped in Dafur and Somalia.
(etc etc etc see thread on you know you are in Africa when.....)
Like I keep saying, sort the basics out first.
Is that to make it safer for the drug and arms dealers that spread conflict in the region?
Sudan is strewn with aircraft that over ran runways and bush strips on account that they inadvertantly landed with tailwinds, hence my less than grandiose suggestion to you regarding the windsocks stuck in the container in Port Sudan... sorry.
BTW DRPAM007, what do you suggest needs to be done to enhance air safety in Africa ??
When you started this thread you asked a for peoples opinions but you dont seem to be receptive to any of the suggestions from people who actually live work and fly in the region for a living, are you looking for a specific line of reasoning in which case feel free to elabourate ?
Regards
Max
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Far, far away.....
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maxrated,
Thanks, I'll take it that your practical safety enhancement initiative for the Sudan, is the installation of 800 windsocks, which I hope are still within their valid shelf life after spending 15 years in a container in port Sudan.
BTW, I dont know where you came by the information that Sudan (as impoverished as it is) has up to 800 airports, landing strips or even heliports combined. I know Sudan should have not more 19 paved runways and about 130 landing surfaces. With 38 of those landing strips being less than 3000 feet long (914m). Yet you mention 800 airstrips.
Are you sure these are legal landing strips, or those used for subterfuge and other nefarious activities? I find that highly disturbing, especially with porous borders and lack of radar coverage in that area. If the information you give is true, then the government of Sudan is not aware of the existence of your 800 airstrip, and they'll be keen to know who owns or authorised these extra 600+ landing strips.
We do appreciate and applaud the sacrifice and humanity of genuine aid agencies and NGO's in the Sudan and Africa as a whole. However, there's a lot more economic and political activities that take place on under the guise of aid.
We'll all try and stay focused on the theme from now on, shall we?
Thanks, I'll take it that your practical safety enhancement initiative for the Sudan, is the installation of 800 windsocks, which I hope are still within their valid shelf life after spending 15 years in a container in port Sudan.
BTW, I dont know where you came by the information that Sudan (as impoverished as it is) has up to 800 airports, landing strips or even heliports combined. I know Sudan should have not more 19 paved runways and about 130 landing surfaces. With 38 of those landing strips being less than 3000 feet long (914m). Yet you mention 800 airstrips.
Are you sure these are legal landing strips, or those used for subterfuge and other nefarious activities? I find that highly disturbing, especially with porous borders and lack of radar coverage in that area. If the information you give is true, then the government of Sudan is not aware of the existence of your 800 airstrip, and they'll be keen to know who owns or authorised these extra 600+ landing strips.
We do appreciate and applaud the sacrifice and humanity of genuine aid agencies and NGO's in the Sudan and Africa as a whole. However, there's a lot more economic and political activities that take place on under the guise of aid.
We'll all try and stay focused on the theme from now on, shall we?
Last edited by DRPAM007; 4th Sep 2011 at 13:18.
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: U.K.
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Many of those landing strips are maintained by NGOs. They are essential due to the roads being impassable during wet season. However, I am sure if arms dealers want access to poor and remote villages in the middle of nowhere then they could use them too......or just use a helicopter of course.
Ever heard the adage that the most dangerous part of any flight is the drive to the airport? Well, yeah in that sense Africa is a very dangerous region to fly.
My best answer to the OP is not to generalize too much about an entire continent but try to go country by country. However, in many of the poorer countries then lack of good regulatory bodies, a means of enforcement of regulations, corruption, war, weather, terrain and lack of infrastructure and properly trained ATC are a few of the hazards which contribute to the danger.
I agree with max BTW. May as well have realistic goals. If you fly in an inherently dangerous region, the onus is on you to find ways of mitigating the risks to an acceptable level.
Ever heard the adage that the most dangerous part of any flight is the drive to the airport? Well, yeah in that sense Africa is a very dangerous region to fly.
My best answer to the OP is not to generalize too much about an entire continent but try to go country by country. However, in many of the poorer countries then lack of good regulatory bodies, a means of enforcement of regulations, corruption, war, weather, terrain and lack of infrastructure and properly trained ATC are a few of the hazards which contribute to the danger.
I agree with max BTW. May as well have realistic goals. If you fly in an inherently dangerous region, the onus is on you to find ways of mitigating the risks to an acceptable level.
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The wrong side of town.
Posts: 193
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DRPAM007
NO they are not legal airports in the first world sense of a legal airport, most of them are simply open areas adjacent to rural villiages and settlements, only the most robust aircraft , Twotters , DC 3's Pilatus porters etc can even contemplate operating into these places and then not in the rainy season.
The official airports you refer to are the official registered airports under the controll of the Govermunt of Sudan. Although I use the word 'controll' reservedly as most would not pass a EASA/JAR/ICAO audit. No one is even sure which parts of the country the goverment controlls at any one time.
It is possible that some airfields are used for nefarious activities, but then the country has been in a civil war for so many years so 'nefarious' would depend on which side you are on.
Back to the topic,
I am curious to know what your suggestions are regarding adressing the shortfalls of African Air safety ?
Personally I for me its a matter of keeping your eyes and ears open, maintain situational awareness, dont do anything stupid,use loads of initiative, make sure your aircraft is well maintained, just the basics really , and you should be ok.
NO they are not legal airports in the first world sense of a legal airport, most of them are simply open areas adjacent to rural villiages and settlements, only the most robust aircraft , Twotters , DC 3's Pilatus porters etc can even contemplate operating into these places and then not in the rainy season.
The official airports you refer to are the official registered airports under the controll of the Govermunt of Sudan. Although I use the word 'controll' reservedly as most would not pass a EASA/JAR/ICAO audit. No one is even sure which parts of the country the goverment controlls at any one time.
It is possible that some airfields are used for nefarious activities, but then the country has been in a civil war for so many years so 'nefarious' would depend on which side you are on.
Back to the topic,
I am curious to know what your suggestions are regarding adressing the shortfalls of African Air safety ?
Personally I for me its a matter of keeping your eyes and ears open, maintain situational awareness, dont do anything stupid,use loads of initiative, make sure your aircraft is well maintained, just the basics really , and you should be ok.