Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > African Aviation
Reload this Page >

Saa crew caught at LHR again

Wikiposts
Search
African Aviation Regional issues that affect the numerous pilots who work in this area of the world.

Saa crew caught at LHR again

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Feb 2009, 14:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South africa
Age: 30
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Saa crew caught at LHR again

SAA crew held for cocaine at Heathrow
Eyewitness News has learnt several more South African Airways crew members have been detained at Heathrow International Airport in connection with the smuggling of illegal goods.
http://www.ewn.co.za/articleprog.aspx?id=6587
highflyer17 is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2009, 15:43
  #2 (permalink)  
dsp
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Joburg
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More SAA crew held at Heathrow 16/02/2009 18:29 - (SA)



Johannesburg - Fifteen SA
Airways crew members were arrested in Heathrow in London on Monday for possession of illegal goods, the airways said.
Spokesperson Robyn Chalmers said three cockpit and 12 cabin crew of flight SA234 from Johannesburg to London were detained by authorities after "contraband" was found in the crew bus at the airport.
"This comes after last month's incident where SAA crew members were arrested in London following the discovery of illegal contraband on the crew bus," Chalmers said.
On 20 January, British officials found 50kg of dagga and 4kg of cocaine in three suitcases (collectively worth approximately R2m) belonging to SAA employees.
SAA tightened existing security measures following the incident including changing security systems, conducting physical searches of bags and using dogs.
"An investigation in Johannesburg, involving SAA Aviation Security and the SAPS Crime Intelligence Unit, is also under way to establish how security procedures were breached," Chalmers said.
She added that the company was co-operating fully with British investigation authorities.
"SAA remains committed to a zero tolerance approach towards the use of the airline's services for any criminal activity and will continue to closely monitor the situation going forward," she said. - SAPA
dsp is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2009, 16:42
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Planet Oceana
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One wonders what the contraband actually is. Just somebody trying to sneak in some biltong...or something more sinister?

Probably one or two crew members involved and the whole of SAA dragged through the mud again. Anyone that thick deserves whatever the law is going to give them.
Hobgoblin is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2009, 18:55
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Planet Tharg
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great suggestion from the other forum:-

SAAPA should insist on two crew buses - one for flight deck crew and the other for cabin crew. It should go some way toward isolating the culprits.
Solid Rust Twotter is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2009, 21:08
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South Africa
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From Sky News:

The South African Airways employees were detained after 5kg of the drug - worth about £250,000 - was discovered in a bag on a flight from Johannesburg.
Crew members were arrested after UK Border Agency officers made the discovery.
A spokesman for HM Revenue & Customs Heathrow said those in custody would be interviewed by HMRC investigation officers.
On January 21, a 15-member flight crew from the same airline was detained after cocaine and cannabis worth £310,000 was found in three bags.
The 10 women and five men questioned over that incident were released on unconditional bail, and were due to report back to HMRC investigators at Heathrow Police Station on March 23.
South African Airways were unavailable for comment.
boypilot is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2009, 01:47
  #6 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,146
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
This will be costing the airline a packet in unexpected costs and they need to put their own (reliable) security people right inside their crews. The PR disaster is another element and the ZA tax payer already hates the subsidy enough, without having this behaviour. If a bunch of ou's tried to run the game within a month of another bunch being caught - they really are well stupid.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2009, 05:25
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: united arab emirates
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry , but I have to withdraw my previous feelings that it was unfair of our government to impose a visa restriction on Saffers. If you cant even search a crew of 15 adequately outbound. ( especially after the high profile incident earlier). Then how do you possibly controll more organised criminals and terrorist networks. Sorry to say but travell restrictions are going to become more and more of a reality as a completely incompetent government continues to take a lax approach towards crime.
fourgolds is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2009, 05:26
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: East
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TIA

This Is Africa
SAT_BOSS is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2009, 05:41
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Champagne
Maybe if they were paid a reasonable wage they wouldn't be FORCED to take desperate measures to make a livable income
You are trying to wind us up right?

They need to put these bastards in jail for a long time, they need to take proper security measures they need to put undercover people in positions and investigate, its obvious there are syndicates at work here, but what do you expect, the ANC has shown that corruption is ok, you cant blame the people for folowing there example.
fluffyfan is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2009, 06:59
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
702 - Today, 17 Feb

I listened to Chris Smyth this morning talking to John Robbie on Radio 702. It was so refreshing to listen to such a person who did not try and duck and dive and "shift responsibility" elsewhere. Drug cartels are not stupid people. Criminals are not stupid either - so, while all and sundry who frequent these pages, instead of crying in our collective beer, why do we not contribute to the "fix". John Robbie was saying that 702 was contacted by SAA Employees stating that security was a "joke" and these incidents were rife - OK, so any SAA employee who claims "they know things" should be contacting Chris directly to see what can be done to stop this crap. OK, so laugh and don't lift a finger, remember South Africa does not have a dole queue - think about it..........
RobinB is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2009, 07:58
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Planet Oceana
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's an idea. Why don't SAA try a last minute change of destination from London to...ooh I don't know...let's say Singapore. In other words the crew who were supposed to fly to London now all of a sudden find themselves going to a place where smuggling drugs mean the death sentence. Not that it ever will (or should!) happen. As a passenger one would feel slightly uneasy of taking a flight where the only one who doesn't know the destination is also the one supposed to take you there!

Failing anything that drastic why don't they tighten up the security arrangements? It used to be that airport security was the responsibility of the Police Force (used to be called SA Railway Police) - not a private contractor in sight. How can they expect proper security when they employ people at minimum wage, make them work a minimum of 60 to 72 hours per week (which is the only way the poor guy can earn enough money to survive), tax him to death on any overtime, and to top it all expect him to be happy doing that for the rest of his working life? No chance of advancement because as far as his bosses are concerned he's just there to provide a bum on a seat. No quarterly performance reviews, no opportunity for him to attend courses, and have you tried studying anything when you work 72 hours per week at some mind-numbingly boring job? From leaving his house to returning at the end of a day your man probably has a 16 hour day what with travelling on trains etc in SA.

Is it any wonder that he'll look the other way when some criminal offers him probably close on a year's wages just to let one or two cases go past unchallenged? Especially when said criminal is living the high life, driving a nice car living in a nice house etc etc etc.

Until they address this at the root it will never change.
Hobgoblin is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2009, 10:47
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Champagne Lover,
A decent wage is a relative term.
For many, what pilots earn in whatever capacity, would be classed as heavenly down-pour!
I wondered when the word 'Nigeria' would pop up? And true to stripes, i see you have mentioned it for the purpose of passer-by type comments.
The point here is that criminals are criminals, Nigerian, South African etc.
There are Nigerian traffickers and also South African traffickers of banned substances and in most cases, independent of each other.
The individuals involved in this scandal are an embarrassment to all air crew and Africans to say the least.
Hopefully the hammer will come down heavy on those found guilty of these atrocious acts and serve as a deterrent to others with the 'get rich quick' ideas.
LongJohnThomas is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2009, 11:37
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Here and there...
Age: 58
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Calm down suitcaseman!

What the post suggests is not a headlong rush back to apartheid, quite the contrary, all it would do is very rapidly point a finger in a particular direction as to who the guilty party MAY BE.

If the bag is in the pilot's bus then it could be a pilot.
If it's in the cabin crew bus, then Sherlock could dedue that it may be a crewman/person.

At least that way someone may get to avoid spending a night in the clink, and it would also have the side effect of calming the frothing at the mouth that is going on right now.

LJT,
As for the nationality of the traffickers, I think it's fair to say it could be either or indeed neither - or both. Whoever it turns out to be, they should be stood against a wall and be made to eat the merchandise, then shot.
unstable load is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2009, 11:56
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Holding somewhere.....
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whoever it turns out to be, they should be stood against a wall and be made to eat the merchandise, then shot.
Ha ha ha...if only! But then we would be told that it's not politically correct to do that! I say a public stoning.....that should take care of any of the misdeamenours currently on the go!! Then a one way ticket to Thailand with the contraband strapped proudly round their necks.......
Ok take cover!!!!!
beechbum is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2009, 12:09
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Makes me proud to be a Seffrican!

Every time one of these incidents occurs, customs is going to pay extra attention to the airline in question.

I'm not condoning this activity, but if this criminal were smart, they would have shut down this 'pipeline' for at least a couple of months. Obviously not a criminal genius at work here!

I feel sorry for all the scrutiny the innocent crew are going to face for the next few months. I agree with the suggestion that cabin and cockpit be segregated for transportation to and from the airport.
Glassos is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2009, 13:57
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: your sisters house
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I for one, if I was an SAA crew member, would be sh1t scared of one of these traffickers in my crew popping something inside my bags while i wasn't looking. Lets face it, it's hapened before and it'll happen again. Hopefuly not to some innocent cabin/cockpit crew unknowingly carrying some scumbags stash and then tkaing the fall 4 it.
These people make me sick
LittleMo is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2009, 19:16
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Planet Tharg
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didnt we just spend decades fighting aparheid and discrimination in SA?
Hardly the point.

UL seems to have got it first time. Besides, AFAIK the CC and flight deck crew mostly stay in separate hotac in any case unless things have changed in the last year or four.
Solid Rust Twotter is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2009, 21:18
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: South Africa
Age: 51
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Considering the example goverment officials are setting, it's only a matter of time before government departments like SAA start following suit.
rudder hard over is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2009, 21:53
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Behind The Boerewors Curtain
Age: 41
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hehehe, maybe they didn't shut down the coke pipe cause them sneaky beagles at heathrow only smelled the grass last time around...

These bastards should be hung, cause one of these days crews will have to be strip searched at the airport...

Where are the days when peeps still had some integrity...
FlyItLikeARental is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2009, 03:34
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The wrong side of town.
Posts: 193
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pulled this off avcom.



National airline expands into profitable new business
Jeff Chaucer has the scoop on an unnamed African airline that's found a new way to offset massive losses
Jeff Chaucer*

17 February 2009 13:56

SOMEWHERE IN AFRICA - In response to criticism and some dissatisfaction at the allocation of R1,6bn in government's 2009 Budget to the ailing national airline, the carrier has announced its intention to introduce "contraband transport" as a new service that it hopes will catapult the beleaguered airline into profitability.
Speaking at a media conference held earlier this week, Vanya Kruschek, the newly appointed Russian head of corporate strategy and business planning at the national airline, revealed that the audacious strategy was arrived at after a four-day brain-storming session by senior executives at a suitably plush South African coastal golfing resort.
According to Kruschek: "We were nearing the end of the second day and starting to wonder where we could find double cheeseburgers, when Andrew Coleman had the breakthrough idea. He pointed out that what we really needed to do was find a higher margin business than just moving around people and ordinary cargo. After that, for some reason, the answer seemed obvious."
The summary business plan distributed to media in briefing packs shows a two-year implementation horizon after which the airline expects the business to be fully profitable.
Initially the airline will focus on routes from South Africa to Europe and the United States as a McKinsey study had revealed that this was where there was greatest demand for the offering. When asked about the impact of the global recession on demand, especially in developed countries, Ms Kruschek responded that the McKinsey study had found there was a relatively inelastic demand curve for the types of product that the national carrier would be transporting.
"Somehow, people will always find money for these goods, even if it means not making the payments on the house that month." On certain routes, such as the flight to Amsterdam, the national carrier was apparently in discussions with "Proudly South African" about the use of the brand to promote the cargo.
In response to a question from the press, Kruschek reassured all loyal clients that passenger transport would remain a key part of the offering. In an innovative extension of the existing loyalty programme, passengers would, from the start of 2010, be able to earn extra points if they were willing to carry a parcel in their luggage or strapped to their body.
While analysts agree that the plan might be just what the airline needs to save it from perpetual reliance on government handouts, Chris Tyson from Credit-Suisse expressed some concern about implementation progress.
"The national airline might be in danger of being tripped up as another African airline which, since implementing a similar plan of action, had 30 crew members have been arrested at Heathrow in a couple of months .
"It's all fine and well to identify a high-margin business but if you don't pay attention to the details, you're never going to earn that margin. As so often in the past with the national carrier, our major concern is around their ability to execute their strategy."
The national carrier's head of corporate affairs, Juan Martinez, admitted that there had been some teething problems, but that they were looking at ways of using the government funding to "smooth the process" with border authorities in target jurisdictions: "The economic crisis works to our advantage here as everyone is being more innovative about how to supplement their income."
When asked how they felt about the plan, the umbrella trade union body expressed tentative support "as long as then national carrier continues hiring our countrymen and doesn't try to bring in Nigerians or Columbians just because they are supposed to have superior skills in this field."
The finance minister could not be reached for comment but it's widely believed that as long as there wasn't another budget with money allocated to te national carrier in his lifetime, he would feel it was a job well done.
The national carrier revealed that R200m of the R1.6bn had already been paid to Andrew Coleman for his participation in the strategy session and that the airline regarded it as "money well spent".
*Jeff is a member of the Moneyweb community who claims to be a direct descendant of the father of English Literature, Geoffrey Chaucer (1343 - 1400). He says any similarity to real people or companies is co-incidental.
maxrated is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.