Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > African Aviation
Reload this Page >

BA/Comair in Durban

Wikiposts
Search
African Aviation Regional issues that affect the numerous pilots who work in this area of the world.

BA/Comair in Durban

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Jun 2008, 09:40
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Shangri-la
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nationwide standards

These spurious comments about Nationwide - in 2006 NTW was awarded the best domestic airline award. The cabin staff were the best trained in the country, and were constantly being poached by other operators.

Concerning, more seriously, the flight deck crew - they were excellent professionals who did everything required of them in every way. I saw them operate from close-up.

Yes, the top management let them down, but the same thing happens in SAA and Airlink.

And Nationwide never lost a passenger, and now, never will!
very old flyer is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2008, 14:35
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In Denial
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was stranded, but got to watch!

Yes, I was one of those stranded the other day with the comair saga.
Was in the viewing deckm pasing the time when I saw the approach. Herewith the best description I can offer Judgement free:

Final approach on RWY 06, still looked pretty high which caught my attention. From my position it looked like it touched down a little short of Taxiway "C", about 2 thirds down the runway. Almost immediateyl after there was huge amounts of spray obscuring almost the entire aircraft except the top of the tail. Was just able to see that spinning around. Once everything settled, it was in the mud facing the opposite direction.

The weather all morning was horendous and there were a good number of acft that diverted before even trying the approach.

For interest, a little later, in a last dying attempt to get people out of there, an A319 departed, RWY 24 direction, from Taxiway "C", with what looked like a 15kt tailwind at least. Very impressive. Phoned a mate of mine in the know who said they spent hours doing the calcs and it was all above board.
Skyjuggler is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2008, 16:52
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Geneva
Age: 56
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Touchdown just before Charlie (<500m avail from there)? Holy smoke, by that time you should have gone around long ago. You sure you dont mean Golf?
PitchandFan is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2008, 17:45
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: South Africa
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Touchdown just before Charlie (<500m avail from there)? Holy smoke, by that time you should have gone around long ago. You sure you dont mean Golf?
Heard the same from other witnesses. Touchdown close to "C".
nugpot is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2008, 05:12
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In Denial
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<<Sure you don't mean golf?">>

If I had a buck for everytime I get asked this from people who know the airfield layout. Yup, I'm afraid I definitely mean Charlie! Must have been pretty close to the touchdown markings for RWY 24 though
Skyjuggler is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2008, 06:05
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Western Cape
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SAA company limit is max. 10kts tailwind. The guys would never have taken off with more than this. We have to many monitoring devices on board, especially on a A319 to try this trick.

Remember it might have been blowing 20kts, but off to one side, so the wind component down the runway would have been way less.
Gyro Nut is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2008, 08:18
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Behind 1480mm RHA equivalent
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bliksem. Just so those not familiar with the airfield can see:

http://www.caa.co.za/resource%20cent...D_01/AD-01.pdf
Shrike200 is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2008, 08:25
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Where there is loads of sun
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lucky he did not end up 'half way to the harbour'
Insane is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2008, 16:32
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In Denial
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<<SAA company limit is max. 10kts tailwind. The guys would never have taken off with more than this. We have to many monitoring devices on board, especially on a A319 to try this trick.

Remember it might have been blowing 20kts, but off to one side, so the wind component down the runway would have been way less.>>

Hey Gyro Nut... I concur, I know all about the max tailwind for the SAA guys which is why I was amazed. Taking off from Charlie no less. But I assure you it was definitly a tailwind straight down the RWY, Metars for the morning all quote North Easterly upward of 15kt. Avcom have all the METARS.

Anyway, I'm gonna check the archives through liveatc.net and see if I can get the wind the controller reported. Maybe if you're someone in the know you can find out more...? Departed about 1310 local time...
If it turns out that I'm mistaken (happens often enopugh) I shall hang my head in shame for contributing to the rumour mill
Skyjuggler is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2008, 09:48
  #30 (permalink)  
FUG
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Joburg
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aircraft Type

There were 87 passengers and 6 crew on board the Boeing 737-300 and no-one was injured. Passengers and crew have disembarked and are being debriefed by the flight crew and have been offered Lifeline counselling. Most passengers have now left the airport and continued on their journey, even though road traffic has been gridlocked outside the airport due to the bad weather.

Glenda Zvenyika
Communications Manager
Comair Limited
This is taken directly from their press release sent by the Communications Manager - why did they (and always do) lie about the aircraft types? It was a 737-200, why dont they so?
FUG is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2008, 10:08
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Gangstas Paradise
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That probably because she doesnt know the difference between a 200 and a 300!! PP people are all the same.
lvdriver is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2008, 17:35
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cockpit
Age: 58
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote:
Touchdown just before Charlie (<500m avail from there)? Holy smoke, by that time you should have gone around long ago. You sure you dont mean Golf?
Heard the same from other witnesses. Touchdown close to "C".
If it were true they (the crew) did a remarkable job to stop before the end of the runway and do a "hand break turn" without rolling the aircraft and removing a wing from the fuselage in the process?

HansFlyer
HansFlyer is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2008, 04:29
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Dubai
Age: 56
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't want to speculate, but I have had a word with people in the ATC system. Seems that this may be the 1st accident in SA that is directly attributable to WINDSHEAR/MICROBURST.

It is reported that there was a large cell just beyond the upwind threshold. While the aircraft was on final approach, the tower reported winds pretty much 180 degrees apart at the thresholds at either end of the runway. The anemometers reported a headwind for BOTH runways.

Can you imagine the mess had they elected to go-around/reject the land and flown into a microburst?

For my 5 cents worth, nobody injured and the paint only slightly scratched, the crew did a fine job in a trying situation.

Hope the Met Office keeps all the parameters and it get programmed into a sim model for us all to learn from.
Avi8tor is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2008, 09:03
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: South Africa
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seems that this may be the 1st accident in SA that is directly attributable to WINDSHEAR/MICROBURST.
Maybe first airline accident. I had one in 1989.

paint only slightly scratched
Might be a bit worse than that.......

Finally. The 180 at the end was unintentional.
nugpot is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2008, 09:14
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hell's Kitchen
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

Once again the Nation Crew did a fine job of working the situation, if any thing they can operate, one can learn?!!!
NOTOT is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2008, 15:27
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In Denial
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Goodness, cloud bursts, lightning strikes, anemometers giving same directions, ATC having opposite ones... I can't wait for the final report to come out...
Skyjuggler is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.