Cirrus parachutes into the Solent
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: northants
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They need to fit water pockets (or a disconnect) to that parachute. I'll bet that aircraft was dragged at some speed (leaving its occupants behind in the water), luckily they were in the solent so every wind direction was 'on-shore'. I had something similar happen during a RIB airdrop test when one of the parachutes didn't disconnect, capsizing the RIB and towing it towards America (from the Welsh coast) faster than the range tender could sail.
You have to wonder why, once the parachute had dragged the aircraft to the beach, nobody seems to have had the presence of mind to deflate it. Which then brings one to a second question: can Cirrus parachutes be recycled?
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
deployment renders a fair amount of damage to the monocoque as the straps are buried beneath the exterior painted layers..
in addition, the airframe is designed to impact the ground with the gear designed to absorb most of the impact and the seats have a collapsible honeycomb base to save your spine.
Hitting water will likely fuse much more damage to the belly and wings.
looking at the video; inverted with a G1000 full of seawater... someone’s’ premiums are going up!
Last edited by neilki; 31st May 2020 at 19:50.
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: London
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Police were clearly keeping people away. I can see your logic though.
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: London
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What do you think?
Fortunately everyone was ok.
One has to wonder why these Cirrus’ are crashing, it’s such a new design but many are coming to grief?
There is also, of course, the added consideration of the aircraft landing on persons under parachute (fortunately it didn’t).
Fortunately everyone was ok.
One has to wonder why these Cirrus’ are crashing, it’s such a new design but many are coming to grief?
There is also, of course, the added consideration of the aircraft landing on persons under parachute (fortunately it didn’t).
What do you think?
Fortunately everyone was ok.
One has to wonder why these Cirrus’ are crashing, it’s such a new design but many are coming to grief?
There is also, of course, the added consideration of the aircraft landing on persons under parachute (fortunately it didn’t).
Fortunately everyone was ok.
One has to wonder why these Cirrus’ are crashing, it’s such a new design but many are coming to grief?
There is also, of course, the added consideration of the aircraft landing on persons under parachute (fortunately it didn’t).
Last edited by extralite; 31st May 2020 at 23:21.
There is video of a Cirrus parachuting into the Pacific.
Touchdown at 1m 51s (44:00 on clock?)
In a few seconds the water on the RHS door was up to the windows due to the parachute dragging the aircraft.
The sole occupant exited the LHS and the aircraft was inverted and the cabin full of water at 2m 26s (45:06 on clock?).
It appears that therefore it was 65s to invert the aircraft and fill the cabin with water. I suspect that it would have been MUCH sooner if the leeward door had been opened instead of the windward door. I would presume that there was no way that the pilot could control the way the aircraft was pointing at touchdown.
Maybe Cirrus could improve the water landing performance in a bit of breeze? I can't really see how 4 people could have escaped.
Touchdown at 1m 51s (44:00 on clock?)
In a few seconds the water on the RHS door was up to the windows due to the parachute dragging the aircraft.
The sole occupant exited the LHS and the aircraft was inverted and the cabin full of water at 2m 26s (45:06 on clock?).
It appears that therefore it was 65s to invert the aircraft and fill the cabin with water. I suspect that it would have been MUCH sooner if the leeward door had been opened instead of the windward door. I would presume that there was no way that the pilot could control the way the aircraft was pointing at touchdown.
Maybe Cirrus could improve the water landing performance in a bit of breeze? I can't really see how 4 people could have escaped.
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wind at the time was approximately 140/14 so an onshore breeze. Would the aircraft not have made more track distance toward the beach gliding and then deploying than deploying immediately, out over the water, and drifting landward at 14 knots? Maybe that's what they did, time will tell.
Why not a bit of both?
Wind at the time was approximately 140/14 so an onshore breeze. Would the aircraft not have made more track distance toward the beach gliding and then deploying than deploying immediately, out over the water, and drifting landward at 14 knots? Maybe that's what they did, time will tell.
Wind at the time was approximately 140/14 so an onshore breeze. Would the aircraft not have made more track distance toward the beach gliding and then deploying than deploying immediately, out over the water, and drifting landward at 14 knots? Maybe that's what they did, time will tell.
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sadly this is not an isolated incident. By contrast nobody on the ground has ever been injured by a Cirrus coming down under CAPS.
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Geneva.
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
