Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Accidents and Close Calls
Reload this Page >

Cardiff City Footballer Feared Missing after aircraft disappeared near Channel Island

Wikiposts
Search
Accidents and Close Calls Discussion on accidents, close calls, and other unplanned aviation events, so we can learn from them, and be better pilots ourselves.

Cardiff City Footballer Feared Missing after aircraft disappeared near Channel Island

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Mar 2019, 16:04
  #1601 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vance, Belgium
Age: 62
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Pittsextra
Come on - it may not suit the current mood of outrage but I can give you dozens of CPL/ATPLs that make mistakes, even with all the associated ratings.
PittsExtra, you may well have 10,000 hours of flying VFR, if you are not trained and current in IMC flying at night, a young 250 h CPL-IR will be more experienced than you in these conditions.
Luc Lion is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2019, 17:20
  #1602 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hotel Sheets, Downtown Plunketville
Age: 76
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Legal Aspects

It would appear this particular accident has a similar theme to the death of the distinguished lawyer, Sir Ian Brownlie QC and his daughter Rebecca
In January 2010, Lady Brownlie with her husband Sir Brownlie were on holiday in Egypt, staying at the Four Seasons Hotel Cairo at Nile Plaza. On a previous visit to the hotel, she had picked up a leaflet published by the hotel advertising safari tours which it provided. Before leaving England on the subsequent trip, she telephoned the hotel and booked with the concierge an excursion to Fayoum in a hired chauffeur-driven car. The excursion took place on 3 January, and ended in tragedy. The car left the road and crashed. The passengers, in addition to Sir Ian and Lady Brownlie, were his daughter Rebecca, and Rebecca’s two children. Sir Ian and Rebecca were killed. Lady Brownlie and the two children were seriously injured.

The full text of the Supreme Court`s decision may be found at :
https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/do...5-judgment.pdf

The Appeal Court`s earlier decision is more detailed and can be found at :
1 Chancery Lane | Court of Appeal Judgment - Brownlie -v- Four Seasons Holdings Inc
Chronus is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2019, 18:18
  #1603 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Age: 68
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by beamer
It seems that some people are falling into the old trap of equating flying hours with capability. A thousand hours of teaching circuits does not make a good aerobatic pilot, ten thousand hours in the rhs of a heavy four jet does not necessarily mean the same pilot will make a good commander, twenty thousand hours in multi-engine aircraft does not automatically mean that a pilot is anything more than competent in GA; in each scenario it might but no guarantee.

It would be wrong to speculate too much into the Malibu incident but I get the sense that a chain of events took place which put the pilot into a corner from which he felt the simplest way out was to complete the flight. Perhaps there were ample opportunites to break that chain but none was taken resulting in tragedy.
The corner started only AFTER he accepted the flight, despite not being licensed to execute. Also Sala knew and texted he wanted to return in the evening. We are all told to avoid get-home-ites. By accepting a commercial flight he put himself in the corner. I agree with you on the CPL/PPL thing.
vanHorck is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2019, 19:18
  #1604 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by vanHorck
The corner started only AFTER he accepted the flight, despite not being licensed to execute. Also Sala knew and texted he wanted to return in the evening. We are all told to avoid get-home-ites. By accepting a commercial flight he put himself in the corner. I agree with you on the CPL/PPL thing.
Agree - the one thing Airline / AOC SOPS do is to give you limitations/boundaries - they don't always cover everything but they can be very helpful to new commanders in particular. i.e. you can point to the SOP and say "no" not possible at the moment etc - most of the time with no pressure and even if you do get pressure you have a backstop in writing. I think the biggest surprise most Wingly PPLs will get is when confronted by an aggressive cost sharing passenger who demands what he paid for whilst saying, "it looks alright to me" ...... I know even in my commercial days I had to deal with some very famous people (who I had previously admired) who, in my view, lapsed into temporary insanity when told of a delay or cancellation.
Good Business Sense is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2019, 19:30
  #1605 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Pittsextra
I think that actually the root of this is more likely to be found in an overly onerous and costly AOC process than in any other place
Around ten years ago, the airlines, in particular BA, complained that they were paying too much in fees - shortly after that, over a 2-3 year period, AOC fees for the small operators almost tripled and that was in the middle of the biggest recession in a 100 years.
Good Business Sense is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2019, 19:34
  #1606 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,803
Received 135 Likes on 63 Posts
@ sense re your #1620... indeed, I have encountered DYKWIA in ATC, to the extent that I filed an official Report against one of our locally-based Captains.

Pressures can be applied from all quarters, and it requires a bit of balls to tell those up the food chain to go away.
MPN11 is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2019, 20:49
  #1607 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: hector's house
Posts: 172
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think the biggest surprise most Wingly PPLs will get is when confronted by an aggressive cost sharing passenger who demands what he paid for whilst saying, "it looks alright to me" ......
had exactly the same conversation over 20 years ago with a ppl hirer - who is now a BA Captain...lol! (pardon the teenage vernacular) when I called off a flight to Le Touquet with him when he was hours building and I was a QFI, due wx, because despite the Cat 1 conditions at destination, he hadn't noticed the OVC010 with a surface temperature of 01 degrees for a flight planned at 2500' in a PA28 (not certified for known icing).....ok he wasn't a BA Captain then, but what was he thinking? I was the hired help and he was paying for the flight!

I'd like to think he's learned something since
hec7or is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2019, 20:49
  #1608 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vance, Belgium
Age: 62
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by oggers
I see what you are saying but I think the outrage is fuelled more by the clear culture of non-compliance around this operation than any yet to be established pilot error.
Indeed.
If that flight had been flown by a commercial pilot, planning and making the flight professionally but making a stupid mistake during the approach and crashing the aircraft,
this whole discussion would have been reduced to: "very sad, but it can happen to everyone to make deadly mistakes".
Luc Lion is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2019, 20:56
  #1609 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Hier und da
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
No pilot is immune from making an in-flight error. The difference with this Sala accident is that critical errors were made on the ground, even before the engine was started.
Art E. Fischler-Reisen is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2019, 23:44
  #1610 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: High Wycombe
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pittsextra
How many accidents can you recall that would satisfy the terms of illegal "grey flying" which let me push you to suggest that were such flying to be illegal then given the duty of the CAA there would surely follow a prosecution. I can think of just 1, the recently prosecuted PA28 / Manchester pilot.

Unless I am oblivious to a heap more then either one must conclude it either doesn't happen or the CAA turn a blind eye?
A good number of years ago when you were still able to fly fixed wing into Silverstone, I flew a party there in a Twin Otter. The flight was under an AOC and was fully legal, but expecting a ramp check I got the books out the night before and checked the performance (which was, of course, fine). I typed the calculations all out ready for the Flight Ops Inspector.

On arrival there were the two men in blazers, stripey ties and clipboards who checked the docs and, at my insistence, looked at the performance figures. I then pointed to the Bandierante parked next to the Otter (and which had no chance of operating legally from the short grass strip) and asked if they were going to check his performance figures. They pointed to the Irish registration and said they had no authority to inspect foreign registered aircraft, so no. I guess that would still apply to N reg a/c.
VerdunLuck is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2019, 08:18
  #1611 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 95
Received 27 Likes on 4 Posts
Regarding the observation that at one stage CAA Flight Operations and Air Taxi Operations Inspectors did not have authority to board and inspect foreign registered aircraft, this is quite correct. When I was granted a CAA Flight Operations Inspector's Authority and Certificate of Appointment in February 1986 the relevant text began:
"TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN The Civil Aviation Authority of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland certifies that the holder of this certificate is a Flight Operations Inspector appointed to inspect in the interests of aviation safety the operation of aircraft registered in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern ireland, wherever they may be." Then in December 1994 an additional sentence was inserted so as to continue the previous text thus, " and the operation of aircraft not so registered whilst they are within the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland."
Nugget90 is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2019, 12:33
  #1612 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Near Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by VerdunLuck
They pointed to the Irish registration and said they had no authority to inspect foreign registered aircraft, so no. I guess that would still apply to N reg a/c.
Now it would. The usual ramp inspection in Europe is called SAFA for: Safety Assessment of Foreign Aircaft. (https://www.easa.europa.eu/easa-and-...mmes-safa-saca)
what next is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2019, 12:58
  #1613 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 95
Received 27 Likes on 4 Posts
Although I retired as a Flight Operations Inspector in 2001, I doubt that I could really be considered qualified today to comment on the current activities undertaken by the UK CAA with regard to managing safety oversight, for much has changed in the interim. However, we should bear in mind that a presumption exists, and is reflected in national legislation relating to aviation, that all who may be involved in this activity, in whatever capacity, amateur or professional, will wish to perform their duties or activities such that aircraft will fly safely.

Hence, legislation pertaining to non-commercial air transport activities is relatively light on limitations whereas those relating to commercial air transport include additional requirements designed to reduce hazards and mitigate risk when the public hire or offer/provide 'reward' (ie pay for) services on offer. Therefore, it is the responsibility of individuals as well as service providers to ensure that they understand whatever requirements apply to their activities and adhere to them.

It may be worth remembering that laws in the UK are made by parliament whilst the CAA helps to frame such laws as may need updating or introducing acting as advisers to the government. Based upon experience, some laws prescribe requirements that will enhance safety margins whilst others proscribe actions such as are considered likely to increase risk. Although the Authority will investigate where it becomes aware that laws would appear to have been broken, this is by no means its main activity. Rather, this is to advise and assist those who seek to fly themselves as well as those who provide services to the public so as to ensure that, in the case of the latter, through audits and inspections the relevant standards are being upheld to the extent that licences, approvals, certificates, etc may be granted/issued and renewed. Where regulations are found to have been transgressed, the Authority is more likely to take administrative action (eg licence suspension) rather than seek the applications of sanctions through the courts.

Although the methods applied today by those who are employed by the UK CAA may differ in format from those that were applied during the 20 years I spent in the Flight Operations Department, I doubt that the overall purpose has changed very much. It still behoves everyone involved in aviation to know what the requirements affecting their part of the operation are and to do their best to ensure that safety remains their top priority - and this applies across the board to baggage handlers, air traffic control staff, simulator instructors, aircraft design and maintenance engineers, managers, medical examiners, cabin crew, flight crew, surveyors, etc etc. As a former flight safety bulletin some 50 years ago published by Wg Cdr Spry in "Air Clues" had it, "Flight safety is your business" - with the emphasis on 'your'!
Nugget90 is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2019, 14:36
  #1614 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cardiff
Age: 48
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For completeness, this exchange said to be between Callum Davies - Player Liaison Officer of Cardiff City Football Club - and Emiliano Sala may be worth putting on record. It has been published by the French media outlet Ouest-France and shows Cardiff City offering Emiliano Sala a scheduled round trip from Cardiff to Paris . There is a translation at the end of the transcript.




Player Liaison Officer: [thumbs up emoji]

Emiliano Sala: Thank you very much

PLO: It's nothing friend

I write Spanish better than I speak it

ES: Ha ha very good

PLO: My girlfriend speaks Spanish. She is a teacher

[shares commercial flight details]

PLO: It is an option perhaps. Cardiff-Paris.

But it's early.

ES: Friend.

It's good.

I have a flight going tomorrow to Nantes and return Monday night to Cardiff.

Willie McKay called me.

PLO: Ok mate. Have you agreed a price with him?

ES: Yes it's good. We will speak tomorrow before leaving for Nantes.

PLO: Ok that works.

What time do you fly?
korrol is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2019, 22:48
  #1615 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Nantes
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by korrol
For completeness, this exchange said to be between Callum Davies - Player Liaison Officer of Cardiff City Football Club - and Emiliano Sala may be worth putting on record. It has been published by the French media outlet Ouest-France and shows Cardiff City offering Emiliano Sala a scheduled round trip from Cardiff to Paris .
"Offering" is not exactly the best word. He did not offer to pay the flight, although I guess the schedule was more a problem for Sala than the price to pay...
deltafox44 is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2019, 07:38
  #1616 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cardiff
Age: 48
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wouldn't quibble with the point you make deltafox44.

I think it's interesting that the flight from Nantes to Cardiff was being envisaged - by Sala - from the outset as a night flight . He says "I have a flight going tomorrow to Nantes and return Monday night to Cardiff. Willie McKay called me".

This wasn't a case of Sala showing up late for take off on the Monday . Even the previous day it had been planned to be a night flight.
korrol is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2019, 11:21
  #1617 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
....responsibility for this accident lays fully with the pilot in command...
Within the current legislation and as it is laid down, I concur. And that will be a very inconvenient truth for a great many involved parties, so don't expect them to necessarily take this line (hence various interested parties effecting outrage over the criticism of the pilot, by the aviation community.)

All that said, we all know where the blame for the current opaque legislation and grossly ineffectual enforcement lies. And because of that the pilot was, IMO, both responsible and a victim at the same time.
The Old Fat One is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2019, 11:25
  #1618 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Plumpton Green
Age: 79
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mike Flynn


US piggyback licences are issued on the back of UK licences and their restrictions.

In the case of this pilot his eyesight prevented him obtaining a UK night rating because he was colour blind.

So he could not fly at night end of story.


Don't be so sure. He had an FAA Second Class medical without a night flying restriction. To fly an N reg at night, he would only have needed three hours night training with a FAA instructor in his logbook. This would not show up on the 61.75 certificate, because FAA certificates are deemed to include night flying privileges, unless annoted to the contrary.

The difference between CAA and FAA colour vision standards are easy to find online.
patowalker is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2019, 12:11
  #1619 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Nantes
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
.
To be the devil's advocate , this is not what the Sala SMS says , it says to come back in Cardiff Monday EVENING. not night.
Anyway, the sunset was at 16:50 (UTC) and night at 17:20 in the afternoon

Last edited by deltafox44; 4th Mar 2019 at 12:12. Reason: wiggy was quicker
deltafox44 is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2019, 12:19
  #1620 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by patowalker
Don't be so sure. He had an FAA Second Class medical without a night flying restriction. To fly an N reg at night, he would only have needed three hours night training with a FAA instructor in his logbook. This would not show up on the 61.75 certificate, because FAA certificates are deemed to include night flying privileges, unless annoted to the contrary.

The difference between CAA and FAA colour vision standards are easy to find online.
Thats not my understanding. According to the NY FSDO only ratings added by a check ride with an FAA DPE can be added to a 61.75 certificate following TSA approval. You can't override limitations on an underlying licence by carrying out training with an FAA Instructor. Whilst the FAA may have different vision standards these would only have applied if he did a full FAA PPL including a check ride.
S-Works is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.