Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Accidents and Close Calls
Reload this Page >

Cardiff City Footballer Feared Missing after aircraft disappeared near Channel Island

Accidents and Close Calls Discussion on accidents, close calls, and other unplanned aviation events, so we can learn from them, and be better pilots ourselves.

Cardiff City Footballer Feared Missing after aircraft disappeared near Channel Island

Old 4th Feb 2019, 21:55
  #1061 (permalink)  
Resident insomniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N54 58 34 W02 01 21
Age: 79
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Why no MAYDAY?
Even a single pilot would have had a hand free for a call?
Things were obviously not 'OK'.
G-CPTN is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2019, 21:58
  #1062 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,649
Received 68 Likes on 43 Posts
I would think that the aircraft would be recovered,otherwise it`s position would become an `attraction` for divers of a certain disposition.....
sycamore is online now  
Old 4th Feb 2019, 22:01
  #1063 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Moray,Scotland,U.K.
Posts: 1,776
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Would lifting the fuselage add much to the cost, having already chartered Geo Ocean III?
Finding all the small bits would probably be expensive.
Maoraigh1 is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2019, 22:46
  #1064 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by positiverate20
I've seen wingly being discussed as being marginal... but with wingly... generally the pilot is going to a specific location on a specific day anyway and is offering a lift for someone to help with fuel & landing costs etc.
....... unfortunately, most are not going there anyway - most are offering any day, any time, any destination, overnights etc etc - "just ask" - to me that's a commercial charter but the UK CAA and EASA don't agree - after the first Wingly crash the courts will decide.

Last edited by Good Business Sense; 5th Feb 2019 at 07:17.
Good Business Sense is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2019, 23:16
  #1065 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,558
Received 38 Likes on 17 Posts
What the photo shows doesn't resemble the outcome of a successful ditching.

Loss of control from disorientation or icing seem more likely.
RatherBeFlying is online now  
Old 5th Feb 2019, 06:03
  #1066 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 73
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RatherBeFlying
What the photo shows doesn't resemble the outcome of a successful ditching.

Loss of control from disorientation or icing seem more likely.
Tend to agree, but on the other hand making a" successful" ditching at night is not something easy to achieve ( judging height ) so it could still have been an attempt to ditch that turned bad .le.g. hitting tail first , or flipping over.
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2019, 06:09
  #1067 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 73
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by G-CPTN
Why no MAYDAY?
Even a single pilot would have had a hand free for a call?
Things were obviously not 'OK'.
When you find yourself suddenly in the sh*t at 2000ft , communicate is not the first thing that comes to your mind, and would have not helped them much either in this case , switching on manually the ELT would have...
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2019, 06:48
  #1068 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: The World
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
Is there not a legal requirement for an inquest in these circumstances? If so, presumably the Coroner would determine whether the bodies are required for a PM.
On the contrast, by international regulations of the sea the scene of an accident on the oceans is a grave. If you want to recover the bodies, it is an exhumation. Somebody authorized has to demand for it, this why the question to the relatives, and in this case has to be authorized by the country on which territory the accident scene is. There are quite some countries where this is impossible and an offense against the deceased by national laws. Anybody here firm in French funeral law?
ChickenHouse is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2019, 07:12
  #1069 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,806
Received 199 Likes on 92 Posts
Originally Posted by ChickenHouse
On the contrast, by international regulations of the sea the scene of an accident on the oceans is a grave. If you want to recover the bodies, it is an exhumation. Somebody authorized has to demand for it, this why the question to the relatives, and in this case has to be authorized by the country on which territory the accident scene is. There are quite some countries where this is impossible and an offense against the deceased by national laws. Anybody here firm in French funeral law?
Thanks for the background. I wonder if that would then preclude raising of the wreck by the AAIB as part of the investigation, since at least one of the bodies appears to be still inside ?

That said, I would imagine that the family of Sala, and quite possibly also Ibbotson's, would wish to recover the remains of their loved ones. Very sad.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2019, 07:26
  #1070 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: The World
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
Thanks for the background. I wonder if that would then preclude raising of the wreck by the AAIB as part of the investigation, since at least one of the bodies appears to be still inside ?

That said, I would imagine that the family of Sala, and quite possibly also Ibbotson's, would wish to recover the remains of their loved ones. Very sad.
I guess it only means it will need the approval of a judge. Given the 'media high profile' attention (= media making money on it), adequacy will not serve as a reference.
ChickenHouse is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2019, 07:28
  #1071 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 841
Received 41 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
Thanks for the background. I wonder if that would then preclude raising of the wreck by the AAIB as part of the investigation, since at least one of the bodies appears to be still inside ?

That said, I would imagine that the family of Sala, and quite possibly also Ibbotson's, would wish to recover the remains of their loved ones. Very sad.
Its all being decided now as reported from GCI in past 12 hours - Sala's family are demanding the wreck to be raised plus having discussions with the Pilots family,
I read earlier here the wreck site is just in UK waters (well on the border thereof)

AFAIK are the French very involved in recovery and investigation compared to the AAIB ? but please correct me if I am wrong. Thanks
rog747 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2019, 07:39
  #1072 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: n/a
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rog747
Its all being decided now as reported from GCI in past 12 hours - Sala's family are demanding the wreck to be raised plus having discussions with the Pilots family,
I read earlier here the wreck site is just in UK waters (well on the border thereof)

AFAIK are the French very involved in recovery and investigation compared to the AAIB ? but please correct me if I am wrong. Thanks
The position being given on AIS for GeoOcean over the last couple of days appears to be outside UK and CI territory. It looks also to be outside French territorial waters. I.e. it is outside 12 nm from both, indeed more than 24 nm from the French coast.

What this means I’m not sure but as it is a US registered aircraft does it default to US law or does it become something else?

Regarding a coroner, it depends on what, if any, remains are recovered. I doubt a British coroner has any jurisdiction for an Argentine citizen, in a US aircraft, in international waters.

Of course where the ship is and where the wreck is may be different... but not by miles in that depth of water.

Daysleeper is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2019, 08:24
  #1073 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Except for launch and recovery of the ROV the ship will be to all intents and purposes directly over the wreck. If they are looking for odd pieces of wreckage they will perform a grid survey and in that situation they will wander away from the main wreckage.
Oldpilot55 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2019, 08:50
  #1074 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 73
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
on French radio this morning the former head of the BEA confirmed that for investigation purposes they would not need to be retrieving the aircraft. Inspecting visually the cockpit (e.g. if anti- icing was on a, which air source was selected, state of the propeller, etc.). , using an ROV would be enough.
He also said that normally a GA SEP on a VFR flight plan lost at sea would not cause a major investigation and definitively not retrieving the aircraft from the sea bed.
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2019, 09:08
  #1075 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Craven Arms
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would have thought a recovery would be necessary to assess the state of the engine at the time of the ditching. Irrespective of all the other speculation, if the fan quit prior to the descent, I would imagine the maintenance organisation would find themselves in the legal cross hairs. Regardless of the rest of the legal conjecture etc etc, the accident will have happened because of one or more of three factors: 1) Icing 2) Pilot malfunction of some sort or 3) Engine out. The last being pretty significant.
I cannot imagine why they weren't carrying an ELT in the aircraft ready to activate in situations where it all goes wrong...
ShropshirePilot is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2019, 10:05
  #1076 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,085
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
I would hope that this accident would also have a police investigation, and possible criminal and civil case.

2unlimited is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2019, 10:08
  #1077 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Belfast
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Good Business Sense
....... unfortunately, most are not going there anyway - most are offering any day, any time, any destination, overnights etc etc - "just ask" - to me that's a commercial charter but the UK CAA and EASA don't agree - after the first Wingly crash the courts will decide.
I would 100% agree with you in that case- "just ask" is basically an open invitation to potential customers. What is the point in paying all the additional insurance and regulation fees associated with Certification if they can just 'wing (ly) it'. Also, in the event of an accident, there'd be no formal structure to investigate- no directors going to prison for corporate manslaughter. The only paper trail would be £20 notes. Maybe this investigation will trigger a clamp down on cowboys flying commercially under the guise of GA.
positiverate20 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2019, 12:58
  #1078 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
‘The disappearance of Emiliano Sala is still being discussed around the world after his plane went missing en route from Nantes to Cardiff.

Maximiliano Duarte, a close friend of the footballer, has pointed the finger of blame at the player's representative.

"He is responsible," Duarte said of the representative to America Noticias.

"The great truth behind all this is that there is a culprit because Emiliano never decided to get on that plane.

"These are all obligations that one has and as a professional he accepted.

"Emi was forced to board the plane that night."

Willie McKay was the player's representative, who arranged the Piper Malibu to take him from Nantes to Cardiff.’

So, if we believe all the reports, we possibly have a pilot who didn’t want to fly at night and we have a passenger who didn’t want to fly at night meaning that the departure was forced by a person/persons who weren’t actually on board.
runway30 is online now  
Old 5th Feb 2019, 13:02
  #1079 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: South of England
Posts: 1,172
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
So, if we believe all the reports, we possibly have a pilot who didn’t want to fly at night and we have a passenger who didn’t want to fly at night meaning that the departure was forced by a person/persons who weren’t actually on board.
At least we can rely on the AAIB to apply a bit more logic than that!

2 s
2 sheds is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2019, 13:22
  #1080 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2 sheds
At least we can rely on the AAIB to apply a bit more logic than that!

2 s
If, and it is still an if, the pilot decided to depart in circumstances that contravened his licence/ratings then the external influences on his decision making must surely be important. Those external influences could have come from either Nantes Football Club, the agent representing them, Cardiff City Football Club, the person tasked with organising the flight or any combination of them. I am only suggesting that the pressure to depart wasn’t coming from the passenger.
runway30 is online now  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.