Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Accidents and Close Calls
Reload this Page >

Cardiff City Footballer Feared Missing after aircraft disappeared near Channel Island

Accidents and Close Calls Discussion on accidents, close calls, and other unplanned aviation events, so we can learn from them, and be better pilots ourselves.

Cardiff City Footballer Feared Missing after aircraft disappeared near Channel Island

Old 28th Nov 2021, 11:55
  #2381 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PLanet Earth
Posts: 941
Originally Posted by Richard Dangle View Post
Everyone here will have seen our fellow human beings do incredibly, incomprehensingly dumb stuff for no apparent meaningful reasons. And most of us will hold our hands up and admit we have done the same - I know I have. A lot of the time, the thing that has the biggest single influence on any given outcome is simply pure luck.
YMMD!
Summed up perfectly.
Btw. one of the biggest Online Platforms exists mostly out of this (Yout*be), to prove your point.
henra is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2021, 14:05
  #2382 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 128
Read part 91!

Before posting about what 14 CFR part 91 allows and does not allow people should actually read it. Part 91 is applicable to commercial operation and there is no prohibition on being single crew conducting a commercial operation over age 60.

Please stop referring to commercial operation in general when the point you want to make is in reference to a very specific subset of commercial operation.
EXDAC is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2021, 15:11
  #2383 (permalink)  

de minimus non curat lex
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: sunny troon
Posts: 1,397
Originally Posted by EXDAC View Post
Before posting about what 14 CFR part 91 allows and does not allow people should actually read it. Part 91 is applicable to commercial operation and there is no prohibition on being single crew conducting a commercial operation over age 60.

Please stop referring to commercial operation in general when the point you want to make is in reference to a very specific subset of commercial operation.
Those participating in these discussions are fully aware that this US registered aircraft was based in the UK, and not in the USA.
Commercial operations were not permitted by either the FAA, EASA, or UK CAA.
Licensing was based predominantly on EASA regulations.
It is as much an academic discussion here on PPRuNe that pilots aged 60 or more, under EASA, cannot fly single crew commercial operations.
He was illegal on multiple fronts, convicted & jailed for 18 months.
Now appealing the sentence.

Last edited by parkfell; 28th Nov 2021 at 17:39. Reason: syntax
parkfell is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2021, 18:45
  #2384 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 13,520
The age limit of 60 applies to single public transport operations, which the type of flights under main discussion are. Generally speaking, if you approach an AOC holder and buy a seat, it’s public transport.
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 29th Nov 2021, 11:40
  #2385 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: In the Doghouse
Posts: 13
Deterrent needed?

Well, if it is deterrent you seek re' grey chartering perhaps this legal upgrade affecting Europe's coach and road haulage industries from February 2022 may bring hope:

" 7. Joint liability of shippers
A joint liability principle was introduced, whereby shippers can be held liable for the infringements committed by the hauliers they use where they knew or ought to have known the transport services they commissioned involved infringements. "

Were AOC law to include a similar principle it would become easier for CAA, etc, to go after all those in the background, at least in future cases. Perhaps more importantly the deterrent effect could well be significant, instantaneous and all at minimal cost.

Just a thought...
Dog on Cat3 is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2021, 13:25
  #2386 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,118
Originally Posted by Dog on Cat3 View Post

" 7. Joint liability of shippers
A joint liability principle was introduced, whereby shippers can be held liable for the infringements committed by the hauliers they use where they knew or ought to have known the transport services they commissioned involved infringements. "

Just a thought...
I would rather wait until:

a. There are a few successful prosecutions based upon the “Joint liability “ principle outlined above.
b. See an example of how it might be framed in UK law.

The phrase “ought to have known “ would give me cause for concern and thus lead to yet another law on the statute book that is never applied.

YS
Yellow Sun is online now  
Old 29th Nov 2021, 16:08
  #2387 (permalink)  

de minimus non curat lex
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: sunny troon
Posts: 1,397
If not already done, the CAA legal dept need to explore the concept of Joint Liability so that when the likes of football agents etc need to hire an aircraft, they know full well that an AOC operator is the only option.

Perhaps when the MPs get involved, the Department of Transport can give ‘direction’ to the CAA to draw up proposals for new legislation.
PPRuNers might consider writing to their MPs, and Grant Shapps, Secretary of State for Transport with your concerns.
parkfell is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2021, 17:08
  #2388 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 6,893
So who might have been jointly liable here ?

Henderson ? Ibbotson ? McKay ? McKay Junior ? Southern Aircraft Consultancy ? Cardiff football club ? The CAA for looking the other way ? Sala ?

Seems like a route to lawyers' riches.
WHBM is online now  
Old 29th Nov 2021, 17:37
  #2389 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 13,520
I remember a minor CAA campaign (about ten years ago?) where they produced leaflets for potential passengers, explaining the requirement to ensure that a proposed flight was sought from an AOC holder, rather than any old Joe Soap PPL holder who fancied illegally earning a bob or two and risking it.

These were placed on the desk at Battersea heliport and other places and handed out at major events.
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 1st Dec 2021, 21:41
  #2390 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 6,195
CAA launch consultation on cost-sharing

Cost sharing flights are flights shared by private individuals. The ‘cost-share’ element refers to the costs of the specific flight which can be shared between the pilot and others onboard the aircraft. These costs are the ‘direct costs’ which are directly incurred in relation to a specific flight such as fuel, airfield charges, or aircraft rental fees.

One of the problems with cost sharing flights is where pilots and passengers of Illegal Commercial Air Transport collude to present illegal flights as legal cost shared flights.

In 2021 we reviewed the cost sharing regulations. This consultation is focused on our proposals to update the regulations
https://consultations.caa.co.uk/corp...hared-flights/
SWBKCB is online now  
Old 2nd Dec 2021, 07:54
  #2391 (permalink)  

de minimus non curat lex
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: sunny troon
Posts: 1,397
Originally Posted by WHBM View Post
So who might have been jointly liable here ?

Henderson ? Ibbotson ? McKay ? McKay Junior ? Southern Aircraft Consultancy ? Cardiff football club ? The CAA for looking the other way ? Sala ?

Seems like a route to lawyers' riches.
The CAA enforcement need adequate resources and legal authority to undertake HMRC style forensic examination of financial transactions where these unlawful activities are suspected.

Adequate publicity will be needed with any changes in the law to make it abundantly clear that even ‘aiding & abetting’ such activity is an offence with fines/jail time.

Deter the practice with beefed up legislation & the feeding frenzy of M’learned friends will be reserved for an occasional Crown Court appearance.
parkfell is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2021, 11:02
  #2392 (permalink)  
c52
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,184
Somewhat similar case reported from France: PA-46 accident passengers wrongly believed they were flying with airline | News – Intecaerospace
c52 is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2021, 12:21
  #2393 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Seattle
Posts: 104
Rich people making mistakes that only rich people can make; trying to be cheap

And regulators turning a big, blind eye. Quelle surprise.
BoeingDriver99 is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2021, 12:58
  #2394 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 6,195
Wow - unbelievable, especially as the KLM Loyalty programme is called "Flying Blue"
French investigation authority BEA has detailed its concern over the way the flight to Courchevel mountain airfield was arranged, after the passenger organising the trip believed the service was associated with Air France-KLM. The flight – on 8 February 2019 – was actually a private one, arranged through an internet platform called Bluewings which put passengers in contact with aircraft owners and pilots.

Bluewings had been assisted by a start-up studio for new businesses, called BigBlank, which was a subsidiary of Air France-KLM created to incubate innovative travel projects. BigBlank helped create the Bluewings platform. The Bluewings website indicated, in small print, that it was not an airline and its purpose was to facilitate travel by connecting passengers with pilots and aircraft.

But when the passenger paid for the hire of the aircraft and pilot, through a single invoice, the bank transfer details mentioned BigBlank and Air France-KLM, giving the impression that the airline group was involved. BEA adds that other services proposed on the website, such as hotel transfer, could “resemble” those of commercial transport, even while remaining in the scope of private operation.
SWBKCB is online now  
Old 7th Dec 2021, 17:54
  #2395 (permalink)  

de minimus non curat lex
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: sunny troon
Posts: 1,397
Like the concept of AIR TRANSPORT POLICE….
parkfell is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.