Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Accidents and Close Calls
Reload this Page >

Light Aircraft Crash in Oxfordshire

Accidents and Close Calls Discussion on accidents, close calls, and other unplanned aviation events, so we can learn from them, and be better pilots ourselves.

Light Aircraft Crash in Oxfordshire

Old 12th Oct 2017, 09:59
  #161 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CFIT following VFR into IMC
runway30 is online now  
Old 12th Oct 2017, 10:04
  #162 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Reasons for 'Getthereitis' not explored by the AAIB but why was a commercial organisation using a PPL to position a crew or have I got it wrong and it was just 3 mates who were going to split the costs between them?
runway30 is online now  
Old 12th Oct 2017, 15:42
  #163 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: England & Scotland
Age: 64
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can read the AAIB report here


"
G-ATMT was operating below 1,000 ft in an area where the Minimum Safe Altitude (MSA1) was 2,200 ft. It was likely that the aircraft flew in Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC2) below MSA for at least 1 minute 45 seconds before flying into some trees standing
on a ridge of high ground. The aircraft was extensively damaged and the pilot, the only person on board, was fatally injured."


John R81 is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2017, 18:29
  #164 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hotel Sheets, Downtown Plunketville
Age: 77
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by runway30
Reasons for 'Getthereitis' not explored by the AAIB but why was a commercial organisation using a PPL to position a crew or have I got it wrong and it was just 3 mates who were going to split the costs between them?
In a previous post I had enquired whether the pilot was of the Norris family of Bournemouth Flying Club and Anglo American Airmotive Ltd. The latter was taken over by Meridian. It was I think confirmed that he was. This being the case I had thought that Dave held a professional licence at some time during his long career in aviation. There may well have been good reasons why he had swapped it for a PPL. All that matters is that he was a competent and highly experienced aviator. It was just not his day and he paid the ultimate price for his bad day. Only those who have had such a day and are still with us know what it means, to have a bad day.
By the way why should AAIB be concerned about cost sharing for a flight that did not take place.
Chronus is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2017, 21:28
  #165 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,984
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Interesting to note that the pilot had not done a lot of flying in the last 28/90 days:-

Last 90 days - 3 hours
Last 28 days - 0 hours
fireflybob is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2017, 19:57
  #166 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stokenchurch tower by the M40

Weather unsuitable for VFR. Local airfields clear of cloud, but fog has a habit of leaning against this particular slope. All too easy to get lost and disoriented.
mary meagher is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2017, 15:35
  #167 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 25
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by fireflybob
Interesting to note that the pilot had not done a lot of flying in the last 28/90 days:-
Last 90 days - 3 hours
Last 28 days - 0 hours
It'd be interesting to see what he'd logged in the previous nine months. For a pilot with considerable experience and knowledge it's surprising that he wasn't able to assess his currency as being low, and too low perhaps for the conditions.
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2017, 16:37
  #168 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Qwerty
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chronus
All that matters is that he was a competent and highly experienced aviator. It was just not his day and he paid the ultimate price for his bad day. Only those who have had such a day and are still with us know what it means, to have a bad day.
Mmmmmmmmmmm!

Totally unavoidable accident as CFIT so often is.

He could have prevented this "not being his day".
Council Van is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2017, 18:08
  #169 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hotel Sheets, Downtown Plunketville
Age: 77
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Council Van
Mmmmmmmmmmm!

Totally unavoidable accident as CFIT so often is.

He could have prevented this "not being his day".
How, by staying in bed ?

Hindsight is well known to us all.
Chronus is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2017, 18:08
  #170 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,786
Received 29 Likes on 14 Posts
I was very sad to read here that it was Dave Norris who died in this accident. The Norris brothers played a key role in getting me back into the air after a 20 year break. If it wasn't for them I probably wouldn't have enjoyed another 20 years of flying and still counting.
pulse1 is online now  
Old 15th Oct 2017, 10:06
  #171 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Chronus
How, by staying in bed ?

Hindsight is well known to us all.
Steady on. Whilst Council Van may have 'meandered' a little with his wording, I believe his intent was that David Norris, an experienced pilot, qualified in Instrument flying, already having pushed his luck in going below MSA in poor weather, should have made an earlier decision to climb to safety.

That isn't hindsight, that is applying the knowledge and requirements that make up the responsibilities of holding an Instrument Rating. The accident is a tragedy, of course, but there seems nothing to suggest that it should have been inevitable. For a pilot with that experience and those qualifications, this was sadly, but easily, avoidable.
Stuart Sutcliffe is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2017, 11:32
  #172 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by airborne_artist
It'd be interesting to see what he'd logged in the previous nine months. For a pilot with considerable experience and knowledge it's surprising that he wasn't able to assess his currency as being low, and too low perhaps for the conditions.
"The pilot’s flying logbook contained no entries after 25 February 2016. The owner of the aircraft recalled that the pilot flew on 8 and 29 November 2016 for a combined total of 2 hours 35 minutes."

Last edited by runway30; 15th Oct 2017 at 12:37.
runway30 is online now  
Old 15th Oct 2017, 11:42
  #173 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Stuart Sutcliffe
Steady on. Whilst Council Van may have 'meandered' a little with his wording, I believe his intent was that David Norris, an experienced pilot, qualified in Instrument flying, already having pushed his luck in going below MSA in poor weather, should have made an earlier decision to climb to safety.

That isn't hindsight, that is applying the knowledge and requirements that make up the responsibilities of holding an Instrument Rating. The accident is a tragedy, of course, but there seems nothing to suggest that it should have been inevitable. For a pilot with that experience and those qualifications, this was sadly, but easily, avoidable.
"The study argued that rules may be easy to apply when circumstances are clear-cut but more difficult to apply in marginal and uncertain circumstances where they might have the most benefit. In summarising their study, the authors commented:
‘The results suggest ... high uncertainty and dynamism constrain rule-based response, leading to rules becoming vulnerable, fragile or failing completely.’"

Last edited by runway30; 15th Oct 2017 at 12:38.
runway30 is online now  
Old 15th Oct 2017, 19:07
  #174 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Diamond AB (CEH2)
Posts: 6,677
Received 85 Likes on 52 Posts
The thing I find really strange about this tragic accident is the aircraft’s track (Figure 1 in the report). The pilot tracked roughly south and ended up significantly east of Chalgrove and then for unknown reasons, turned left and not right.

The report mentions that there was a GPS on board and the Nav radio was tuned to the Daventry VOR. Turweston is very close to the radial that would allow a direct track to Chalgrove. It seems very odd that apparently neither of the available navigation devices was used.
India Four Two is online now  
Old 18th Oct 2017, 16:25
  #175 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by India Four Two
The thing I find really strange about this tragic accident is the aircraft’s track...
I42, exactly, and it seems strange to me that there is no discussion of the navigation errors in the AAIB report. There are plenty of words about not maintaining VMC etc, but not why he found himself where he did. As you say there was ample nav capability on board. Was there some Track-up/North-up confusion? If there was any investigation into how he normally used the aids on board, there is no sign of it, and if there wasn't, why not?
gonebutnotforgotten is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2017, 18:20
  #176 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hotel Sheets, Downtown Plunketville
Age: 77
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CFIT accidents are mainly resultant from loss of SA.

I42`s comments about the track the aircraft took are curious. These can only lead us to speculation as to the reasons. The left turn could well have been intended to gain VMC and sight of the ground and position the aircraft at some instrument pre- computed fix for a visual straight- in finals approach.
Chronus is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2017, 21:10
  #177 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Uk
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No the first time this has happened in my local Chilterns.

I remember about the time i started instructing a WAC 182 went down on a ridge not far away from the one
Meester proach is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.