View Single Post
Old 27th Nov 2017, 19:26
  #1092 (permalink)  
Lead Balloon
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Australia/India
Posts: 2,756
Originally Posted by Eddie Dean View Post
It was brought about when CAA discovered they could not take regulatory action against ESSO many years ago. Think about why an organisation holding an AoC must have a person responsible for overall control of the AoC.
Nonsense.

An “organisation holding an AOC” is a person, natural or unnatural. Otherwise, an AOC could not be issued to the “organisation” in the first place.

Qantas Airways Limited is a person. CASA is a person.

Persons can be sued and prosecuted.
Lead Balloon is offline