The only people convinced that this is some ruse to destroy BALPA are the narcissistic BALPA diehards
Help me out here.
Can you explain why, at VS, the PPU are insistent on sole recognition, thus disallowing the voices of the BALPA members? BALPA have agreed to STB, why not the PPU? I thought the ongoing ASOS was to achieve sole recognition, or is that not the case?
The fear is not of a new union (there are plenty of existing unions), it's the fear of a union that does not uphold the existing principals of the union movement. No union has ever tried to disallow the voice of other union members.
Would appreciate an answer not laced with rather inappropriate insulting language. Respect, etc.