Originally Posted by
STN Ramp Rat
am I right to think that for the sake of bilaterals Stansted was declared not to be part of London some time ago. I might be completely wrong on that or it might have been a specific bilateral like the UK-US one.
So we have an airport that picks and chooses if it is part of London or not to suit its own gains. Superb.
Still doesn't alter the fact SQ/TZ have said they don't want to introduce London and that London hasn't been mentioned as a possible route in ANY article.