PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - STANSTED - 2
Thread: STANSTED - 2
View Single Post
Old 1st Jun 2017, 11:00
  #3983 (permalink)  
LAX_LHR
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by STN406
First time poster so please be kind.

Was wondering the reason why Kuwait Airways decided not to swap SNN for STN. This is because I work in the terminal building daily and saw on two occasions Kuwait Airways engineers being taken through the staff security point into departures.
The basis of the story is:

Kuwait use SNN as a security stop over as the US isn't allowing it to fly direct.

SNN then proposed a downgrade of their fire cover which meant the KU B77W couldn't use SNN. STN/MAN were looked at as a replacement.

STN initially won out, but then STN bosses realised their transit lounge wasn't up to the job for the flight, so, a switch back to MAN was proposed.

It then transpires that a deal had been done with SNN to keep the fire cover for the B77W, so, the flight is staying there.
LAX_LHR is offline