Originally Posted by
megan
It's a pity you come out with the "incompetent" endorsement without bothering to understanding the circumstances.
From the report.
So the public had been warned of the risk they were accepting, and the woman knowingly accepted that risk.
The car was parked near enough to the red marking.
It's interesting that you determine a level of compassion by word count. Are you really for real? Hate to tell you, but life means accepting risk, and that's the prime reason hospitals have trauma centres. The woman accepted the risk, and unfortunately paid a price.
Does it not occur to you that the incompetent statement(whether it is right or wrong) has nothing to do with whether a bystander was hurt or not but what happened to the aircraft? Take a look at the picture on this post of the final result, read the report and imagine that you were the one who loaned the aircraft to the guy.
I suppose you think that all the tourists killed by terrorists in the UK have themselves to blame because the warning level is high. Your thought process is very questionable.