Originally Posted by
Clare Prop
Could the requirement for another pilot to be with her have been some kind of insurance requirement? A "safety pilot", particularly after taxiing into the Robinson? It doesn't make any of it "right" but it could explain a few things. Sorry, not familiar where the Robbo accident fits into the timeline of the deception.
Doubtful Clareprop. She did 10% of her solo flights actually solo. If it was a requirement then it would have been for all legs.
The story about wanting to share the experience with others is utter rubbish. She either wanted someone with her for all barring the simplest of legs or someone with a vested interest in the aircraft didn't feel comfortable with her on her own.