Nowherespecial
Drink had passed our lips but if my memory serves me correctly we were surprised to discover they were essentially being paid VFR rates.
That was gleaned from a a long night in a Takoradi bar circa 2011.
I fully concur with the mentioned levels of NHV management skills and attributes in WA.
Lowfat - was comparing pay with PHI for same area, not elsewhere. NHV included meals, transport, accommodation etc and with the Euro and tax regime at the time it was 'ok' for month on/off roster for me.
Flying new machines and in a great part of Africa ;-)
However, as the pound strengthened, warranty ran out for obtaining spares and management promises failed to materialise, the scales tipped and employment was found elsewhere.
As always, the balance depends on options and how much you have to put up with until you walk.
My original comment was made after discovering the 'beauty' of capitalism was in my favour at that time - only to fall prey to it later on in flying career when NHV caught up with me again and this time it was CHC throwing far better machines at the customer but at a silly 'chapter 11' sort of price........
Maybe PHI rates have improved, maybe not, but like all companies they will play the 'employment market' and on the pilots' insecurity and fears.
I know a 'captain' who took an FO salary just to remain employed in Norfolk - so I understand it is not always about the money. He was obviously not concerned about the perceived message he sent out to industry but Industry knows they can manipulate wages as pool of pilots allows. Others had different priorities and goals at that time.
I would have to be in very dire straits to work for them again - but never say never as I know the boys and girls flying the 175 are really enjoying the machine.
I just hope that I do not get myself into a position where I have to accept the offer!
212 - just had a look at those scales and it confirms what I was told at the time. NHV were paying the equivalent of PHI's top scale for their 'heavy IFR' - hence the reason for my comment.
Last edited by EESDL; 8th Feb 2017 at 01:51.
Reason: Reviewed PHI scales