Having been mentioned a couple of times in this publicly available statement I have only one conclusion.
It's old-hat , a rather sad and belated gesture of defiance and has no real significance.
There is so much in there which can be disproved if Curtis-Taylor really wants to re-live her 'annus horriblis 2016' , all I can compare it with is old newspaper headlines from 1939, found in someone's loft in 2017.
Ask yourselves this : What's the difference between Tracey Curtis-Taylor and Lena Zavaroni ? You'll still find a few people who remember Lena Zavaroni was !
In the event of Curtis-Taylor wanting to table a motion at LAA-AGM 2017 for re-instating her award , then if the content of her website's publicly available statement has any substance , then bring it on !
But it won't happen ! And we all know why ! [ That includes the woman in question].