It will be interesting to find out if this guy did go to the CAA with the details. Does anyone know? I can't believe the he would not have done. If he did, then, having looked at the judgement I can not see a single reason the CAA would not have Thomas Cook bang to rights. It is clear that BALPA dropped legal support for him at court, have the CAA let him down as well? If they have, I cant see any view other than those charged with protecting the pilots, cabin crew and public have acted totally irresponsibly. The big unanswered question is ......why?