Nicely summed up Major Cleve. All those mentioned should really take a long hard look at themselves. Thankfully a judicial/tribunal system picked out the minutiae and questioned on it. It is what they do. There seemed to be a very cavalier attitude to everything when dealing with this poor individual ( Balls of steel!) and to the person reading with half a brain cell, questions would have been asked and conclusions formulated almost all the way through. Subjectivity was a key factor as opposed to what they perceived was objectivity by right. Noone can say how a person feels but the person. Reasonable belief... that was particularly interesting, seems obvious! The arguments put forward by Management were poor, to say the least.In fact at times, and in my humble opinion, I could eat a bowl of alphabetty spaghetti and poop a better argument!
Last edited by Septimus Pyecroft 48; 17th Dec 2016 at 16:27.