Originally Posted by RetiredF4
nice to see you guys back
I second that!
No, really. I am glad that due to lack of fresh Airbus accidents, most of you are reduced to flogging the largely decomposed horse of AF447 threads with same old unrealistic theories and not quite believable "look what happened to me" stories.
Point about "I didn't hear stall warning so it should be made stronger and work below 60 kt" was covered in Final report, 1.16.2 and Appendix 7 to Interim2. 40-odd recorded events of pitot blockage and degradation to alternate law on 330/40ies ended uneventfully. Except AF447. Whoever got stall warning, heard it and pushed. Except that one crew. BEA was unable to explain what made AF447 case unique, or rather very rare, as similar stuff of pulling till impact in stall happened on DHC-8 and MD-80 before and A320 after the crash.
With 40 other similar cases on the type ending without scratch (except maybe TAM), it would be very brave to stake one's reputation on the claim "Aeroplane did it!" without protection of PPRuNeanonimity.