Like me, I'm sure it is important to all API members that the facts be revealed when it comes to cases like this. Since API is obviously bound by non-disclosure, it would be beneficial to hear from
footballfanppl why the claim was denied? I asked footballfanppl this question on the other API thread, but so far he
has chosen not to reply???
I find that odd.
This is my hard earned money so I took the time to contact support regarding a previous comment. The response is below:
Harvey Watt & Co receive commissions /renumeration from LIPS/API for case assessments with the amount Harvey Wayy & Co receive being dependent on percentage saved denying a pilots claim. The more saved by denying a potentially large claim, the more commissions Harvey Watt & Co receive.
API support answer: API pay HW a flat rate / pilot member every month.