View Single Post
Old 8th May 2015, 14:11
  #33 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,857
except for one recommendation - that Charter and RPT be treated the same by the regulator to minimise the exposeure to the general public.

That is NOT what the Seaview Royal Commission recommended, what you have quoted is a CASA perversion of the findings just for the purposes of imposing additional unjustified restrictions on "charter".

Specifically, he DID NOT recommend that Charter operate to the same standard as RPT.

As per usual, few in the industry ever bother to check the sources, but just accept the CASA spin. Find yourself a copy and see what Staunton actually said.

Tootle pip!!

PS: Midnight, I did say " ---- (by whatever name)" to avoid exactly the picking of nits that has happened. Perhaps I should have said: " inappropriate CNS/ATM frequencies" to be technically accurate.
LeadSled is offline