Don't think they do, UL. I suspect my certified 912 S2 schedule looks just like the UL versions. My point was mainly about using the stats to see if conventional wisdom (LAME = better maintenance) was supported.
I take little on trust these days, LS, having seen seen pretty agricultural maintenance practices in all regimes. But for all of the frustrations, I still prefer to have my bug smasher annuals done by a LAME, despite other potential options for the particular aircraft. I agree, though, that finding the right LAME is not trivial, especially when VLA/LSA engines are involved.