Creampuff...
In your last post you responded to the quote:
I will never understand why CASA and ATSB took such risks and tried to convince a savvy Senate committee that 'they' were doing it all – according to Hoyle.
Because they confidently predicted that they would get away with it, scott free.
Their prediction has proved correct.
I have to agree with you Creampuff, but the $64K questions are:
1. What was the reason behind CASA and the ATSB taking the risks that they both did in the Pel-Air debacle?
2. Why did they do what they did?
I have to say, I'm buggered if I can work it out.
All I can conclude is that the stakes must have been mighty high for both to have done what they did.
Suggestions/answers anyone?
