PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - NATS Lose Gatwick Contract (Split thread)
Old 22nd Jul 2014, 05:41
  #58 (permalink)  
anotherthing
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not Long Now, Tomohawk

Yes it is up to GAL and that is my point. They want(ed) the extra movements. If they still do then they will have to pay NATs which means the overall contract for services will cost more than just the DFS contract. I understand that NATS were going to practically give GAL the tools to up the runway occupancy rate as part of any contract; obviously now that is not an option, therefore if GAL do not want to stand still, they will need to pay NATS so that is extra money in addition to the DFS contract.

As for why BB is not properly manned; no idea. However it is true, time to time they phone TC for assistance

Last edited by anotherthing; 22nd Jul 2014 at 07:26.
anotherthing is offline